I you rather play poorly and win that play well and lose.
However yesterday we did play some good football at times.
Earlier someone said Perth were crap. Not sure it was the same game I was watching.Heaps of people reckon that Siggy was the best- he did score a great goal- but poor defending by Perth, no players on the post. He was lucky not to give away a penalty in the second half, I thought it was and so did the commentators.
Can't remember the last time Tim was subbed. He is good enough, but will have to change the way he plays.Pushes up too often to support the strikers( who are trying to get hold of the aerial balls) Needs to control the middle more and create for the strikers.
On that performance I am sure we will beat Sydney this weekend.
Hi,
I agree with you on Tim, he is still good enough. He is an untiring, hard-working type of player and also does dictate the scheme of play and puts into effect any previously arranged plans.When the forwards are attacking-he does follow up behind them and does pick up any partial clearances by the opposition...It's just that he seemed to be holding back-It is also obvious to see the total frustration on his face. Picked up a professional foul, but he acknowledged that.
I would go so far as to say that there will be some competition for particular positions, Tim is very experienced and he possess that "mental toughness".
Hope this weeks game will be a turning point for the boys.
Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo