Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix alienating out of town fans?

80 replies · 1,675 views
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Gangsta, look up,
 
it looked like it was freezing cold on the tv that day so I'll forgive you for not being at that game. (even though you southern men are meant to be tough)
joachim2008-10-17 15:12:23
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
it was 24 all.  Stacy john missed the conversion from just about right infront.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
joachim wrote:
Gangsta, look up,
 
it looked like it was freezing cold on the tv that day so I'll forgive you for not being at that game. (even though you southern men are meant to be tough)


Stop being such a cranky bugger Joachim, he would have been about 6 at the time. I was the same age and can't even remember that competition.
Critical_Lemon2008-10-17 15:17:25
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
joachim wrote:
Gangsta, look up,
 
it looked like it was freezing cold on the tv that day so I'll forgive you for not being at that game. (even though you southern men are meant to be tough)


Stop being such a cranky Joachim, he would have been about 6 at the time. I was the same age and can't even remember that competition.
 
Stop making me feel old and I'll stop being cranky, together we'll prevent me from being old and cranky.
 
He didn't have to remember the game, he just had to read the thread.
 
I'm also going to dispute the 24 all call, Matthew Ridge was playing (got a try) so he would have been kicking goals too.
 
That's the game I'm thinking of, then again maybe it was another English team, I am going off my hazy memory and not using wiki.
(I'm not actually looking to argue about the game, more just jogging my hazy memory. 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It was definetly 24 all. The warriors scored an equalising try in the last minute of the game,and jones missed the conversion from right in front of the posts.
 
Back on topic,im all for preseason etc games being played outside of wellington,but regular season would just be taking a home game away from us and would only serve to alienate fans in wellington. If people want to see the WELLINGTON phoenix,it makes sense they would have to travel to wellington. About as much as if you wanted to see sydney you would travel to sydney etc etc

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
It was definetly 24 all. The warriors scored an equalising try in the last minute of the game,and jones missed the conversion from right in front of the posts.
 
Back on topic,im all for preseason etc games being played outside of wellington,but regular season would just be taking a home game away from us and would only serve to alienate fans in wellington. If people want to see the WELLINGTON phoenix,it makes sense they would have to travel to wellington. About as much as if you wanted to see sydney you would travel to sydney etc etc
 
It was 24 all. 2001. I was there! We scored 3 tries in the last 7 minutes then Stacey missed the conversion which was the last kick of the game. Wasn't right in front but it was definitely kickable.
Jag2008-10-17 15:29:06

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
back in the good old days when a draw was a draw and there was no extra time

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TBH, I followed league long before I followed football (along with ice hockey it was the main sport I followed), and the fact that the Warriors tried to pass them off as "New Zealand" when they're strictly based in Auckland made it a lot harder for me to support them as a second team (after Illawarra of course). So as a result I've been pretty apathetic about them ever since the name change. I did support them a bit as Auckland Warriors, even going to one of their first matches (against Western Suburbs at Campbelltown) with my father (who's a kiwi). But since the identity change, nope.

(That being said, as an Australian, it's naturally harder for me to cheer for "New Zealand" anyway...)

The Phoenix serve the entire football community, not just Wellington. The 'nix have no obligation to help Waitakere prepare for the CWC. And the Phoenix helping Hawke's Bay United is not entirely in the best interests of Team Wellington . And I believe the Warriors have provided support to league south of the Bombays as well. That, along with "sticking it to those bloody Aussies" should be enough. There's no need for either team to use the name "New Zealand" IMHO.

(...though I can understand the marketing benefits.)
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
meh, my memory fails me and by the fact that some of your compatriots do remember a game being played in chch (which I don't seem to remember) it would seem that wiki has failed you. It's not right all the time (mainly because people missing their marbles such as myself can contribute to it) 
 
Anyway, come on the Phoenix!
 
I hope I don't have to edit this again.
joachim2008-10-17 15:38:34
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
joachim wrote:
meh, my memory fails me and by the fact that some of your compatriots do remember a game being played in chch (which I don't seem to remember) it would seem that wiki has failed you. It's not right all the time (mainly because people missing their marbles such as myself can contribute to it)
 
Anyway, come on the Phoenix!
 
I was wrong, I just looked at finals.
 
My bad
Gangsta!2008-10-17 15:38:09
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I remember that i used to be annoyed that auckland flogged their fail football side onto the rest of the country by rebranding from auckland to NZ.
 
Thats going to get me some stick,but o well.
 
I think wellington is a bit more tighter community than auckland...and wellingtonians are generally proud of their teams as their own. There probably isnt much point in being NZ phoenix from a marketing point of view,as it would kind of take the team away from the city.
 
Im not saying this very well  but am sure you get the general idea

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
joachim wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
Jag wrote:

Personally, I think only National teams or Rep type teams should be called "New Zealand ...........".


No club side should be called the NZ anything.
Fully agree. It also strikes me as a very NZ phenomenon as well, can't think of an another club in any sport that bears the name of the country it's from? Hm, Austria Vienna? Can't think of any else. And yes, I do like the Warriors and follow them on TV, but I'd much prefer them to be the Auckland Warriors rather than NZ Warriors.

�

Dinamo Zargeb was know as Croatia Zargeb for a while, cause a sh*t storm amoungst some of the fans so they had to change it back to Dinamo.


Sorry News, but I have to have a bit of a go:

In essence what you say is true. Tudjman (Croatian President in the 1990s) insisted on changing Dinamo's name after independence because he thought it sounded too communist. The name was first changed to HASK Gradjanski (from the two clubs which were amalgamated in 1945 to form Dinamo), but was then in 1993 changed to Croatia Zagreb. But I need to point out here that Croatia is not the Croatian name for Croatia, s there was never any sense of the club somehow being representative of the whole country, so the parallel with the New Zealand Warriors doesn't really work there (guess the same goes for Austria Vienna too).

Like you said, BBB (I include myself here as well) were very unhappy with the name change, and continued to refer to the club as Dinamo, and continued to press for an official return to the name. I remember a rally at the Square in Zagreb after the war finished and Tudjman was glowing in outlining the great future, and all that other political crap, and we started chanting Dinamo, Dinamo which really pissed him off. We couldn't get the name changed back while Tudjman was alive, but once he was out of the way, the official resistance to the name change weakened, and the Dinamo became Dinamo once again in February 2000.


And just in case there was some confusion, that is the Dinamo shirt in my avatar...
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
The Croatian national League and I was suggesting you were starting El Grapadura on it.






HNL = Hrvatska Nogometna Liga

Only top 2 divisions are HNL, 3rd division down they're regional.


And I'll stay on-topic from now on.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
True...though beign based in auckland it was kind of implied.Werent they the first to rebrand to NZ though? Before the whole "lets rebrand our side to NZ" thing started happening,it was sort of assumed that the city a side was based in,was what it was representing. Which i actually think is right.
 Of course i believe the phoenix (and kingz/knights) have an obligation to NZF and do to some extent represent as our only proffesional side in the country,ultimately they still represent Wellington,and should be named as such.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
No, the Warriors were New Zealand long before the Knights came about.

The Kingz of course did play competition games outside Auckland though, three here, Christchurch, new Plymouth, hamilton.

I also watched pre-season/mid-season games in Palmy, Wanganui, Napier and Rotorua plus they played some pre-season in the South island.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
EG, this thread has more hi-jacks than a shipment of arms near Somalia... one more didn't hurt.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
No, the Warriors were New Zealand long before the Knights came about.

The Kingz of course did play competition games outside Auckland though, three here, Christchurch, new Plymouth, hamilton.

 
First football memory I ever have is of the CHCH Kingz match .
 
They played Wollongong and lost 4-2. I won a football that was kicked into the crowd at half time
Gangsta!2008-10-17 15:52:49
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wynton got both goals.

The also played Perth there...3-3 draw from memory.Wynton again and some bizaree own goals.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
My first Kingz memory - THAT Wynton volley during their first season.  Or am I thinking of something else?  Hard News?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
One against Newcastle?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Turn and score... fap, fap, and indeed fap.  Criminal that it isn't on Youtube or anywhere.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
OK, gratuitous 3000th post.

Do I get anything for this magnificent feat?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Can we become the Bondi Phoenix? I'm feeling alienated.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
OK, gratuitous 3000th post.

Do I get anything for this magnificent feat?


Yes, a week off to get a life.  Hang on, i'll just ban you.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
OK, gratuitous 3000th post.

Do I get anything for this magnificent feat?


Yes, a week off to get a life.  Hang on, i'll just ban you.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Trying to boost your post count with thatdouble post there?

Won't work, I'll still catch up with you by the end of next week.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
so what happens if you got near twice that? 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Trying to boost your post count with thatdouble post there?

Won't work, I'll still catch up with you by the end of next week.


I have no idea what you mean, I have thousands less than you...

You do Chris, but your posts/day are way down these days.
Hard News2008-10-17 16:30:00

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
yeah i kicked a nasty habit 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So is that ban coming or not then?

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I won't tell you what my real tally is then Special One.

No, EG, if you want it then it's not fun... that really doesn't sound good.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
No, EG, if you want it then it's not fun... that really doesn't sound good.


No, it doesn't.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Whatever you do, don't change to "NZ Phoenix", I just start hating it because it start to suggest that it is the end of the road from Professional Football in New Zealand when it should not be. And that we should be looking to either turn NZFC into professional league in the future or another A-league team from NZ.

What put me off NZ Knights was, it when pear-shaped after Wynton Rufer left the Football Kingz with the board changing and booted Chris Turner out and then it was the same idiots on the NZ Knights as well as having very few New Zealand players with lower division English players that was suppose to represent NZ and not Auckland. It seem to me it was a run as lower division English club than the top New Zealand Club. I might have called it "England Knights" at one stage.

As for the NZ Warriors, I still follow them but they always be Auckland Warriors to me and that I really don't see any other possible NZ League team into the NRL unless it is a Waikato team if any.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NRL is the top league competition in the world, it had a huge following in New Zealand before the warriors came around, and many kiwis play in the other NRL teams.

the 'Nix will pick up as the A-League does and when we start to get some success, and media hype. Probably would help if we made the world cup.


Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I met a Phoenix supporter at the CCM game just recently,He was born and bred in Sydney.He comes on this site under the name of Pumpa. Go figure.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I live in Wellington but I wish the Warriors would change their name to the Auckland Warriors _ I'll still watch them every week but I'll stop cringing every time I hear the stupid name. 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Actually when I am upset with them I do call them Auckland warriors.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's so convenient.  Brilliant win by THE Warriors .... Bloody Auckland Warriors lost again.

I know, I know, its serious!

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Mike check, 1, 2.
 
I think a potential problem with calling a local professional team "NZ" is that the can be mistaken by some people as the national team of this fine country, and when they underperform as the New Zealand Knights did, it doesn't represent the stateof the game here very well. Of course this is for less educated or sporty followers who don't know or watch alot, but tune into the sport news to see the the NZ Breakers/Knights/etc lost again/
Oh Wellington is wonderful. We got the wind, the rain and the phoenix. Oh Wellington is wonderful.
Permalink Permalink