Posted November 27, 2015 21:46 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34
interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
I'm a big tin-foil hat conspiracy guy but you are reaching.
Unless of course you have evidence that the FFA killed Kennedy?
interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
I'm a big tin-foil hat conspiracy guy but you are reaching.
Unless of course you have evidence that the FFA killed Kennedy?