interestingly enough doesn't elaborate on what this incident was and what was he doing that might cause someone watching to say he actually did something?
because it defeats the purpose of being anonymous if you state which incident you were pinged for (at least it was signed off anon).
and telling the truth would be a quick way to getting a permanent ban by the FFA.
I'm a big tin-foil hat conspiracy guy but you are reaching.
Unless of course you have evidence that the FFA killed Kennedy?
Which bit was reaching? That giving a specific event would allow someone to figure out who the individual was?
Or that the FFA might do something a wee bit unethical?