Current version

Posted January 24, 2016 03:46 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

when did I say she wasn't entitled to take that stance. She's entitled to do that, and I'm entitled to disagree in a reasonable way. I was even agreeing with her to a certain degree in that calling it "mans world" (or something to that effect) would be lazy and I can see how it would limit the audience and even put some people off. 

I also deliberately posed my first response in question form, because I wanted to understand her POV more clearly, I wasn't intending to be harsh. 

(Sorry again mods). 

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34

when did I say she wasn't entitled to take that stance. She's entitled to do that, and I'm entitled to disagree in a reasonable way. I was even agreeing with her to a certain degree in that calling it "mans world" (or something to that effect) would be lazy and I can see how it would limit the audience and even put some people off. 

I also deliberately posed my first response in question form, because I wanted to understand her POV more clearly, I wasn't intending to be harsh. 

(Sorry again mods). 

Tegal edited January 24, 2016 03:47

when did I say she wasn't entitled to take that stance. She's entitled to do that, and I'm entitled to disagree in a reasonable way. I was even agreeing with her to a certain degree in that calling it "mans world" (or something to that effect) would be lazy and I can see how it would limit the audience and even put some people off. 

I also deliberately posed my first response in question form, because I wanted to understand her POV more clearly, I wasn't intending to be harsh. 

(Sorry again mods).