Post history

History for Ryan

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted March 20, 2016 20:08 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

yellowsite wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Interested in any examples you can give.

Use of the salary cap, is relevant to what I am talking about.

What's wrong with how we spend the cap? You don't like the fact that we spend more than it? Is that what's concerning you?

Or the fact that we don't spend 1.4 million dollars on marquees like Holosko? He's a great return on investment. Or even 500k on Garcia (which the FFA is paying for not CCM allegedly) - great return there, way better than players that fit under the cap like Fornarolli and Mclaren.

Previous versions

4 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34
yellowsite wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Interested in any examples you can give.

Use of the salary cap, is relevant to what I am talking about.

What's wrong with how we spend the cap? You don't like the fact that we spend more than it? Is that what's concerning you?

Or the fact that we don't spend 1.4 million dollars on marquees like Holosko? He's a great return on investment. Or even 500k on Garcia (which the FFA is paying for not CCM allegedly) - great return there, way better than players that fit under the cap like Fornarolli and Mclaren.

Ryan edited March 20, 2016 20:40
yellowsite wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Interested in any examples you can give.

Use of the salary cap, is relevant to what I am talking about.

What's wrong with how we spend the cap? You don't like the fact that we spend more than it? Is that's what's concerning you?

Or the fact that we don't spend 1.4 million dollars on marquees like Holosko? He's a great return on investment. Or even 500k on Garcia (which the FFA is paying for not CCM allegedly) - great return there, way better than players that fit under the cap like Fornarolli and Mclaren.

Ryan edited March 20, 2016 20:11
yellowsite wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Interested in any examples you can give.

Use of the salary cap, is relevant to what I am talking about.

Like the fact that we spend more than it? Is that's what is concerning you?

Or the fact that we don't spend 1.4 million dollars on marquees like Holosko? He's a great return on investment. Or even 500k on Garcia (which the FFA is paying for not CCM allegedly) - great return there, way better than players that fit under the cap like Fornarolli and Mclaren.

Ryan edited March 20, 2016 20:09
yellowsite wrote:
2ndBest wrote:

Interested in any examples you can give.

Use of the salary cap, is relevant to what I am talking about.

Like the fact that we spend more than it? Is that's what is concerning you?

Or the fact that we don't spend 1.4 million dollars on marquees like Holosko, he's a great return on investment. Or even 500k on Garcia (which the FFA is paying for not CCM allegedly) - great return there, way better than players that fit under the cap like Fornarolli and Mclaren.