Post history

History for Napier Phoenix

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted March 23, 2018 02:59 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
Napier Phoenix wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.

If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34
Blew.2 wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
Napier Phoenix wrote:

I'd suggest that Rob is far more circumspect than old Gareth and I know who I think you're most likely to get the truth out of [however painful it might be for you Patrick and others].

This requires starting wit the assumption that Gareth actually knows what the truth is.
If Rob was not committed to the Nix long term why would he be jetting off to FFA headquarters regularly to discuss  APFC plans for the future(Most likely at his cost). Also why would the APFC have him as a major part of the group if they did not want Wgtn in. 

Easy to ask questions to get the info to back anyone's slant on a topic. Just ask the RBB :-)

Most likely at his own cost.... I doubt it, it will be a legitimate business expense and if they are running the club at a loss, then you and I as tax payers are subsidising all of this.