Post history

History for Tegal

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 21, 2018 01:31 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

Napier Phoenix wrote:
Doloras wrote:
Napier Phoenix wrote:
CA makes a statement that prima facie has some ring of truth to it - the open minded want to further test the validity of CA as a reliable source, citing that CA has been right in the past when we all doubted it

None of the statements in the above part-sentence have any support whatsoever, please provide.

This bullshark has already taken up too much of my time - do your own research instead of going off on the last thing you remember reading.

Again, isn’t that what you’re doing? You read a piece by annonymous agent and immediately believed it. 

It’s not like you’re offering up any reasoning why people should believe a rumour by an annonymous agent over a journalist who very closely covers the club and says it’s untrue. 

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34
Napier Phoenix wrote:
Doloras wrote:
Napier Phoenix wrote:
CA makes a statement that prima facie has some ring of truth to it - the open minded want to further test the validity of CA as a reliable source, citing that CA has been right in the past when we all doubted it

None of the statements in the above part-sentence have any support whatsoever, please provide.

This bullshark has already taken up too much of my time - do your own research instead of going off on the last thing you remember reading.

Again, isn’t that what you’re doing? You read a piece by annonymous agent and immediately believed it. 

It’s not like you’re offering up any reasoning why people should believe a rumour by an annonymous agent over a journalist who very closely covers the club and says it’s untrue.