Post history

History for ForteanTimes

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted May 15, 2018 19:53 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale. Also the "formally reject" suggests it's not  bullshark.

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Previous versions

9 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale. Also the "formally reject" suggests it's not  bullshark.

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 20:04

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale. Also the "formally reject" suggests it's not  bullshark then.

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 20:03

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale. Also  the "formally reject" suggests it's not  bullshark then.

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 20:03

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale. Also it's the "formally reject" so not bullshark then.

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 20:02

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale. Also it's a "formally reject" so not bullshark then.

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 20:02

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale. Also it's a "formal" rejection so not bullshark then.

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 19:58

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale and they are going to formally reject the bid. 

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...

That's all folks...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 19:57

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale and that they are going to formally reject the bid. 

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...


Unknown editor edited May 15, 2018 19:56

The realistic part of the article for me is the reason the FFA rejected the sale 

"The FFA is understood to have informed both parties it will not allow the sale to go through while other entities are bidding for expansion to a 12-team competition. The FFA is set to formally reject the proposal in the coming days."

They still want to see if someone else comes up with a better bid for entering a team in the league. 

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-set-to-rej...