Posted May 12, 2018 17:27 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34
Funny to me it doesn’t sound like a merger, if proposal is only 3 games a year max in Sydney, and any contract has that locked in. Plus one partner is an existing A League team, the other just a consortium with money I presume. More like an equity stake, or share buy in (admittedly big one if at 50%).
However for a headline I guess the word merger is more sexy. Language can be everything.
Funny to me it doesn’t sound like a merger, if proposal is only 3 games a year max in Sydney, and any contract has that locked in. Plus one partner is an existing A League team, the other just a consortium with money I presume. More like an equity stake, or share buy in (admittedly big one if at 50%).
However for a headline I guess the word merger is more sexy. Language can be everything.
Funny to me it doesn’t sound like a merger, if proposal is only 3 games a year max in Sydney, and any contract has that locked in. More like an equity stake, or share buy in (admittedly big one if at 50%).
However for a headline I guess the word merger is more sexy. Language can be everything.