Post history

History for ForteanTimes

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted May 16, 2018 03:03 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

Doloras wrote:

"Piney : Is the Phoenix licence for sale

Morrison : errrrrrrrrr.........................no is the easy answer

Newspaper headlines a couple of days later : FFA reject $15m Phoenix licence sale"

I pointed out until I'm blue in the face, but I'll do it again:

- that newspaper headline was an unsourced rumour. It didn't even say where the journo's facts were coming from. If it had said "sources close to FFA/the Nix/the Campbelltown FC told us" I would give it some credibility. If it had said "we approached the Nix for comment but got none", again it would have some credibility. But it did not, and it cited no sources, so I give it none.

Why do you believe it? Just because it was in an Aussie paper?

Too many specifics, no response from the club, the journo is going to look a right c*nt if the FFA don't do the formal rejection in a couple of days. 

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34
Doloras wrote:
The JourneyFan wrote:

"Piney : Is the Phoenix licence for sale

Morrison : errrrrrrrrr.........................no is the easy answer

Newspaper headlines a couple of days later : FFA reject $15m Phoenix licence sale"

I pointed out until I'm blue in the face, but I'll do it again:

- that newspaper headline was an unsourced rumour. It didn't even say where the journo's facts were coming from. If it had said "sources close to FFA/the Nix/the Campbelltown FC told us" I would give it some credibility. If it had said "we approached the Nix for comment but got none", again it would have some credibility. But it did not, and it cited no sources, so I give it none.

Why do you believe it? Just because it was in an Aussie paper?

Too many specifics, no response from the club, the journo is going to look a right c*nt if the FFA don't do the formal rejection in a couple of days.