It looks like the goalposts are shifting. A few days ago it was "Welnix are selling us to SW Sydney and lying about it". Now that the truth is out, the same people are saying "Welnix have not been transparent about their moves seeking investment in the club".
The second statement is fair enough. But it is not the same as the first statement.
Dislike Welnix all you like, although I think if you dislike them so much you'd welcome them selling up. But don't be so desperate for more ammo against them that you believe outright furphies.
It isn't the same as the first statement, but it still squares with it. The lack of clarity in their statements, and their glacial pace in publicly responding to certain things has suggested to me, at least, that there was more to the story than they were admitting, which we now know is true. They didn't lie, per se, but they were very economical with the truth, which raised suspicions. Many of us synthesised the available information and thought 1 was true as a result of 2.