I repeat, my issue is with the idea that if Rob M. was better with the media, this story about pokies money wouldn't have appeared. If so, that's corruption.
I don't think that is even remotely what happened. It looks like Liam has been working on this since before the recent bust up with the Nix and the media. It's clear from a few of your posts in this thread that you don't have a lot of trust in the media, but I think it's pretty rough to be accusing Liam of having such loose ethics.
i) Some people say: story wouldn't have been published now if Rob M had been better with media (/ hadn't provoked it).
ii) Dolores says (by my reading): if the story hadn't appeared for that reason, that would've been corruption. (i.e. doesn't say anything about what did actually happen).
iii) Other people wildly misinterpret some or all of the above.