Post history

History for Critical_Lemon

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 2)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted June 02, 2018 11:17 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

If the Phoenix weren't a for-profit entity then there wouldn't be shares to own/sell. That is different from actively looking to make a profit out of the club, but when it comes to the trust funding the legal status is important.

There isn't anything in today's article that clearly says "the Phoenix broke the rules" and indeed some of what was mentioned is pretty standard practice (whether that practice is acceptable to the general public is something else), but I want to know what all of that money was used for because they can't have spent $600,000 on those few guys doing some coaching while they were academy players.

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34

If the Phoenix weren't a for-profit entity then there wouldn't be shares to own/sell. That is different from actively looking to make a profit out of the club, but when it comes to the trust funding the legal status is important.

There isn't anything in today's article that clearly says "the Phoenix broke the rules" and indeed some of what was mentioned is pretty standard practice (whether that practice is acceptable to the general public is something else), but I want to know what all of that money was used for because they can't have spent $600,000 on those few guys doing some coaching while they were academy players.

Unknown editor edited June 02, 2018 11:25

If the Phoenix weren't a for-profit entity then there wouldn't be shares to own/sell.