Posted June 03, 2018 09:38 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34
Like most employed people they can be paid for their time in amateur activities if the funder covers that cost. (Activities)
So Chris Greenacre is partly employed by the Phoenix, partly by the academy and his academy wages are covered by the gambling money? Isn’t that the exact point, gambling money is subsidising the academy (within the rules I’m sure, but doesn’t feel quite right).
Like most employed people they can be paid for their time in amateur activities if the funder covers that cost. (Activities)
So Chris Greenacre is partly employed by the Phoenix, partly by the academy and his academy wages are covered by the gambling money? Isn’t that the exact point, gambling money is subsidising the academy (within the rules I’m sure, but doesn’t feel quite right).