Current version

Posted April 14, 2020 00:57 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

theprof wrote:

Gareth and Rob are still the two standing directors of Welnix,

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/...

sole shareholder is Investnix Ltd

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/3522632/shareholdings

which is solely owned and operated by Rob.

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/3522631/directors

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/3522631/shareholdings

not sure how that translates into $$ but in simple terms it would suggest that Gareth is not as financially involved with the Nix anymore.

I think it's a limited partnership with Investnix and ultimately Rob being the general partner. As the general partner (despite WelNix being called GP) is the only one that matters in a Limited Partnership the limited partners don't have to be visible (I think, it's been a while).

I'm sure there's an accountant on here that can correct me but I don't think that this necessarily reflects the actual shareholding.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34
theprof wrote:

Gareth and Rob are still the two standing directors of Welnix,

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/...

sole shareholder is Investnix Ltd

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/3522632/shareholdings

which is solely owned and operated by Rob.

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/3522631/directors

https://app.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/3522631/shareholdings

not sure how that translates into $$ but in simple terms it would suggest that Gareth is not as financially involved with the Nix anymore.

I think it's a limited partnership with Investnix and ultimately Rob being the general partner. As the general partner (despite WelNix being called GP) is the only one that matters in a Limited Partnership the limited partners don't have to be visible (I think, it's been a while).

I'm sure there's an accountant on here that can correct me but I don't think that this necessarily reflects the actual shareholding.