Current version

Posted April 20, 2020 07:04 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:34

Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
Ryan wrote:

Treasury put a value of 4.7 million per person. Gareth got the 10k number because someone he knows had his medication declined from pharmac and the cost of that medication was 10k.

I don't think some cancer patients and many more would agree on $4.7m per person.  But have you a sauce for the highlighted? 

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/02/21/453077/is-a-...

Thanks for that piece on the “value of a statistical life”. But can't see GM mentioned in it or re his friend

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:34
Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
Ryan wrote:

Treasury put a value of 4.7 million per person. Gareth got the 10k number because someone he knows had his medication declined from pharmac and the cost of that medication was 10k.

I don't think some cancer patients and many more would agree on $4.7m per person.  But have you a sauce for the highlighted? 

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/02/21/453077/is-a-...

Thanks for that piece on the “value of a statistical life”. But can't see GM mentioned in it or re his friend
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2020 07:06
Ryan wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
Ryan wrote:

Treasury put a value of 4.7 million per person. Gareth got the 10k number because someone he knows had his medication declined from pharmac and the cost of that medication was 10k.

I don't think some cancer patients and many more would agree on $4.7m per person.  But have you a sauce for the highlighted? 

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/02/21/453077/is-a-...

Thanks for that. But can't see GM mentioned in it or re his friend