Wellington Phoenix Men

Phoenix Players: Paid in $NZ or $Aus

64 replies · 2,979 views
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Are the wages, weekly, fortnightly or monthly?
Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tony P wrote:

The following is included in the Salary Cap:

 

�         Wages, Super

�         Bonus � ie: Goals, finals

�         Accommodation

�         Sign on Fee

�         Agents Fee

�         Flights

�         Motor Vehicle

�         Other income

 

We are given a Aud/NZD rate by the FFA which means that the salary cap in Aud determined by the FFA is then calculated into NZD. That is our cap. Our boys are paid in NZD into NZD Banks. Hope that explains it.


Thanks Tony, good to see a Victorian-born Italian-blooded gent doing well with himself!

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
darkhorse wrote:
They play in wellington, there contracted to wellington, there fore the Phoenix players are paid in NZ currency


Yes, but look at Tony P's note about it above. Stuff like the lock-in rate for the Dollar exchange (and what;s included in the cap) is what this thread is about. Look above the "NZ club, NZ dollars" stuff, we're thinking real world business stuff here (or at least trying to!
diego's son2009-11-09 03:08:17
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Lonegunmen wrote:
Are the wages, weekly, fortnightly or monthly?


May as well ask him if the players Xmas Hampers are included in the cap!
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
diego's son wrote:
Lonegunmen wrote:
Are the wages, weekly, fortnightly or monthly?


May as well ask him if the players Xmas Hampers are included in the cap!
 
They are. Any gifts are included so they won't be getting anything for Christmas
Tony P2009-11-09 13:57:12
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tony P wrote:
diego's son wrote:
Lonegunmen wrote:
Are the wages, weekly, fortnightly or monthly?


May as well ask him if the players Xmas Hampers are included in the cap!
 
They are. Any gifts are included so they won't be getting anything for Christmas
 
 
 
C-Diddy2009-11-09 14:06:59

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm guessing here, but as far as the superannuation issue goes you'd have to assume that WPX would match whatever the Aussies get, just as a necessity of being competitive in the employment market.
 
While not required to contribute the same minimum as the Aussie clubs by law I would bet that they do it anyway (or top up salaries accordingly) because if they didn't they'd be putting themselves in a weaker negotiating position vis a vis other clubs.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tony P wrote:
diego's son wrote:
Lonegunmen wrote:
Are the wages, weekly, fortnightly or monthly?


May as well ask him if the players Xmas Hampers are included in the cap!
 
They are. Any gifts are included so they won't be getting anything for Christmas
 
Unbelievable. Tony, thanks for answering this thread. As a Melbourne-based person, it's great that you, as a club CEO, attend to the supporters' question here. MVFC supporters would wish that Geoff Miles, or Geoff Lord would do such a thing. I seem to recall Tony Ising addressing supporters for a while, but that faded out about ealry 2007.
diego's son2009-11-09 15:23:38
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Smithy wrote:
I'm guessing here, but as far as the superannuation issue goes you'd have to assume that WPX would match whatever the Aussies get, just as a necessity of being competitive in the employment market.
 
While not required to contribute the same minimum as the Aussie clubs by law I would bet that they do it anyway (or top up salaries accordingly) because if they didn't they'd be putting themselves in a weaker negotiating position vis a vis other clubs.
 
Pretty much.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
About the same time he faded out...
 
Spot on Mr Hard News.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So if Accomodation and flights are included in the salary cap?
 
What happens when the Glory because of its location has over a week based in Brisbane because they have back to back matches in North Queensland?
 
Is that a special case or do players get paid less if their flights and accomodations are more expensive because of the city they are playing out of?
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think Tony means any club funded personal flights or accomodation.  Not match related.

So a holiday in Paris isn't used as a gift outside the cap, and nor is a million dollar house on Gold Coast waterways.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
I think Tony means any club funded personal flights or accomodation.  Not match related.

So a holiday in Paris isn't used as a gift outside the cap, and nor is a million dollar house on Gold Coast waterways.


hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
I think Tony means any club funded personal flights or accomodation.  Not match related.

So a holiday in Paris isn't used as a gift outside the cap, and nor is a million dollar house on Gold Coast waterways.


That's correct. It's a good system, aside from the "second marquee" thing in season three (clubs replacing injured players with players with uncapped salaries - like Bridges at SFC and Aloisi at CCM), no one has effectively rorted it.
Only SFC giving Zdrilic $50k in a brown paper bag in Season One (and being found out), and BRFC going over the cap by  tiny sum (poorly calculating superannuation payments) in Season 3 (?) have been breaches. It's pretty watertight.

It's also worth noting that there are the Service Agreements in place. External companies (i.e. sponsors) can pay players for external services (i.e. branded clinics, advertising campaigns, etc) outside of the cap, to an extent. I think that extent is 20% of the cap.

So if the cap is $2.2mill AUD, then $440k AUD can be spent by sponsors on players for various small tasks (or given as a gift equivalent - say a car). In the end it means the total amount payable to players is more like $2.6mill, but the club doesn't pay all of it.


If a player is also involved in a coaching role with the club (i.e. Andrew Clark at CCM, or Muscat at MVFC), I believe 1/3 of their wage is not counted in the cap. Don't quote me on that exact figure though.


Salaries in the cap range from approx $42kpa (minimum wage, note this includes super [compulsory 9% in Aus], whereas in Australia at least most salaries are given as $x + super), up to about $250kpa (and maybe even a bit more for some players) in the cap next year.
In the first season of the HAL, the biggest salaries in the cap were guys like Colosimo at PGFC, Zdrilic at SFC, etc, on $200kpa or so. Back then, big earners were anyone on like $120k+

Coming in to next year, $100kpa is pretty average. Higher paid players will be pushing $300k in the cap, there will be a LOT of players just either side of $150k, and even talented kids can be asking for more than $55k (whereas in Season One they took their $38k thankfully).

It's been a big jump, and is helping with attracting foreigners (Ifill will surely be right up there in the highest-paid players of all teams next year), and keeping players here (i.e. Colosimo would be looking at $260k+ based on his form, that combined with home comforts may keep him away from a $400k+ asian contract).
Jaza2009-11-18 14:42:41
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
one news says Ricki Herbert's pay package is $250k
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jaza, are there any restrictions on spouses and/or family members of a contracted football players either working for the club itself (or one of the owners companies) or one of the sponsors or companies paying a service agreement?

For example, player A moves to GCU under the cap but spouse has reportedly gotten a job earning lots of $ organised through the club as a way of topping up player A's salary.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
"she doesnt even have to turn up"
 
"professional mystery shopper"
 
Do the coachs salary come under the cap or just the players? Seems a dumb question,but something ive always wanted to know for sure.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Just players.
 
You can pay your coach whatever.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
so player/coach gets a bit dodgy then..

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Diego's son, Ive been thinking about the exchange rate issue for years, dunno why I didnt just jump on here and ask. Now its all explained.
With the fixed exchange rate used, players with an AUD focus could actually do much better than if they stayed in aussie if an exchange rate change occured in their favour, Obviously could go the other way too. 
 
Good stuff.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Thinker wrote:
Diego's son, Ive been thinking about the exchange rate issue for years, dunno why I didnt just jump on here and ask. Now its all explained.
With the fixed exchange rate used, players with an AUD focus could actually do much better than if they stayed in aussie if an exchange rate change occured in their favour, Obviously could go the other way too. 
 
Good stuff.


No worries, Wellington is lucky that the club CEO comes on here at times to answer your questions. Melbourne Victory had Tony Ising do something similar, but it was canned just after Season 2.

Good question to ask, especially as NZ doesn't appear to pay the 9% Superannuation that Australia does, so that would be a factor as well.


diego's son2009-11-20 10:22:37
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
so player/coach gets a bit dodgy then..


Not really, it would be two separate contracts. The players contract would be negotiated based on the previous players contract (i.e. what the player/coach was as a player beforehand and equivalent expected rises) on an appropriate pro-rata playing performance under assessment of the club board. This can be assessed under the cap. And the coach contract will be based on equivalent coach of that level is expected to his peers. (the association will know the equivalent expected pay salary). Well that is based what one old club that has done that in the past I know had done. It may be different nowdays.

But each club is different in dividing the the stuff but as long as the club board and parties as well as the association is satisfied with the justifications of the contracts and passes the review process of the association, then it is OK. Its how it is drafted up.AllWhitebelievr2009-11-20 18:45:27
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bullion wrote:
Jaza, are there any restrictions on spouses and/or family members of a contracted football players either working for the club itself (or one of the owners companies) or one of the sponsors or companies paying a service agreement?

For example, player A moves to GCU under the cap but spouse has reportedly gotten a job earning lots of $ organised through the club as a way of topping up player A's salary.


I'm not familiar with any restrictions, but I can't imagine them being so tight on other loopholes but letting one that obvious go. I've mostly been impressed with how well (and fair) it covers things.
Permalink Permalink
over 16 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Player/coach is simple.

Approx 70% (I forget the exact figure - there is one) is counted in teh salary cap. The rest isn't.
Permalink Permalink