Post history

History for valeo

Player ravings v Jests

Back to topic

Current version

Posted December 07, 2014 02:13 · last edited December 07, 2014 02:15

bwtcf wrote:

chefmivec wrote:

didn't see the game . was working but sounds to me like everybody should be getting a 12 out of ten

LOL. 4's maybe. We were plain awful for the first hour. Distressingly so. Then Vinnie came on, and Roly went forward to be alongside Wee Mac and BOOMSHANKA it all changed.

Which is extremely puzzling because Rodriguez had been our best player on the park before that.

No way were we awful at any point. Watch the game again. Saying we were 'plain awful' for the first hour when we created clear cut chances is fudgeing stupid.

We had a 20 minute period at the start of the 2nd half where we weren't creating anything, but played well otherwise.

Previous versions

2 versions
valeo edited December 07, 2014 02:15
bwtcf wrote:
chefmivec wrote:

didn't see the game . was working but sounds to me like everybody should be getting a 12 out of ten

LOL. 4's maybe. We were plain awful for the first hour. Distressingly so. Then Vinnie came on, and Roly went forward to be alongside Wee Mac and BOOMSHANKA it all changed.

Which is extremely puzzling because Rodriguez had been our best player on the park before that.

No way were we awful at any point. Watch the game again.

We had a 20 minute period at the start of the 2nd half where we weren't creating anything, but played well otherwise.

valeo edited December 07, 2014 02:14
bwtcf wrote:
chefmivec wrote:

didn't see the game . was working but sounds to me like everybody should be getting a 12 out of ten

LOL. 4's maybe. We were plain awful for the first hour. Distressingly so. Then Vinnie came on, and Roly went forward to be alongside Wee Mac and BOOMSHANKA it all changed.

Which is extremely puzzling because Rodriguez had been our best player on the park before that.

No way were we awful at any point. Watch the game again, please..