Current version

Posted August 27, 2019 03:12 · last edited August 27, 2019 03:13

el grapadura wrote:

Why do we have only 4 visas last year in the table when we had 5? Sheridan certainly didn't start half of his games, so by that metric he'd definitely be a failure.

We also had 5 imports the season before, and while most of them were starters, it is debatable how much of a 'success' they really were (take Rossi for example).

Re: Cillian: As mentioned I didn't include summer transfers.The season before we had the 5th visa siging also as a summer transfer. My numbers are solid.

It's not debatable based the objective measure I used, which is simply that a visa player is a failure if they don't start at least half of the regular season games. 

Subjectively yeah there's a lot more than whether they start or not, but Nelfoos point was that a visa player has to be in the starting XI so this is what I was measuring.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited August 27, 2019 03:13
el grapadura wrote:

Why do we have only 4 visas last year in the table when we had 5? Sheridan certainly didn't start half of his games, so by that metric he'd definitely be a failure.

We also had 5 imports the season before, and while most of them were starters, it is debatable how much of a 'success' they really were (take Rossi for example).

Re: Cillian: As mentioned I didn't include summer transfers.

It's not debatable based the objective measure I used, which is simply that a visa player is a failure if they don't start at least half of the regular season games. 

Subjectively yeah there's a lot more than whether they start or not, but Nelfoos point was that a visa player has to be in the starting XI so this is what I was measuring.