R1 vs Perth Glory | Sunday 12th Oct | 5pm | RoF

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
about 17 years

james dean wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

austin10 wrote:

Ernies other blind spot is our defense......anyone can see they are past their use by date. Too old and too slow.....they will be our achilles heel again this season. Too high an error rate, often too slow to react, often too slow to move.

If I wasn't so lazy and if I knew how to work this interwebs thing, I'd search for my posts from Feb/March 2013 when I was saying that Dura and Siggy were done and we'd made a bad mistake by re-signing them both.

The other issue is that all their deficiencies aside, Carlos and Stein combined for 18 goals last season - and that was only good enough to get us 9th. Looking at all the forwards/attacking players we have now, can they score 20+ this season? I'm not convinced.

The reality for a side like the Phoenix in this league is that probably 70-80% of the games are really tight (there are occasional hidings from the top sides, and occasional big wins we get when everything clicks, but these are generally exceptions) - are our forwards good enough to make most of limited chances you get in such games, and do we have an attacking player who can win a game with one piece of magic?

And conversely, can we rely on our backline not to make dumb mistakes that cost us games that we shouldn't really lose - and did we get the answer to that question last night?

Exactly, we've both been on this for a while and it's so obvious I can't see how nothing has been done about it.  There were posts from people in pre-season seriously arguing Siggie today is better than he was in 2010.  Both these guys are getting on and you lose that edge which means things like yesterday happening very quickly.  I really question Durante, I cannot remember the last time he had a good game for club or country.  He just looks out of form and I wonder about whether his legs have gone

You can't just get rid of them though, they're on contract. There is a salary cap. Etc etc.

Marquee
420
·
6.3K
·
over 17 years

I could do it...for a price

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

Smithy wrote:

You can't just get rid of them though, they're on contract. There is a salary cap. Etc etc.

That's correct but there needs to be serious questions asked if they are offered further extensions before their contracts are up. Even then, it may be 1 year at the most and coming off the bench and you would only do 1 of them, not both.

By the end of this season, Sigmund will be 34 and Durante will be nearly 33. Sigmund is off contract and Durante has another year. You would like to think that by the end of this year, Sigmund and Boxall have swapped places otherwise we are in a bit of bother.

The other thing is that they are both captain and vice-captain so there is no succession plan. The only ones I can think of is McGlinchey as he did it for CCM or Moss but I would prefer my captain to be in the field so he can speak with the referee if needed. By the same token, Moss strikes me as having a more commanding personality than McGlinchey.

First Team Squad
22
·
1.8K
·
over 16 years

Moss would be good for a few swear words at the ref. As Captain, not sure he is a good option.

Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
over 17 years
Maybe Ernie's plan is to play Kenny instead of Brockie but couldn't because of the suspension. I fucking hope that is the case because, deaspite being a fan of Ernie's, I struggle to see why he persists with Brockie even though we are only one game in.
Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
about 17 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

Smithy wrote:

You can't just get rid of them though, they're on contract. There is a salary cap. Etc etc.

That's correct but there needs to be serious questions asked if they are offered further extensions before their contracts are up. Even then, it may be 1 year at the most and coming off the bench and you would only do 1 of them, not both.

By the end of this season, Sigmund will be 34 and Durante will be nearly 33. Sigmund is off contract and Durante has another year. You would like to think that by the end of this year, Sigmund and Boxall have swapped places otherwise we are in a bit of bother.

The other thing is that they are both captain and vice-captain so there is no succession plan. The only ones I can think of is McGlinchey as he did it for CCM or Moss but I would prefer my captain to be in the field so he can speak with the referee if needed. By the same token, Moss strikes me as having a more commanding personality than McGlinchey.

 

I think your confidence in Boxall over Siggie is mostly optimism more than demonstrated fact. 

But other than that I agree, they are reaching the ends of their careers. 

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

i think it might be Napier. Kenny definitely deserves a spot. While I don't think his all-round game is that great either, I see him as more likely to score than Brocks right now.

Think people underestimate how much we will miss Stein and Carlos. We have good players but no real game breakers - no Ifill, no Berisha etc. Though I suppose WSW get by without one..

Siggy and Dura have been great and I think both epitomise what the club is about - but you can tell that the more effort they are putting in for us, the worse it's getting. Unfortunately is getting to that time where we seriously need to think about replacements.

Not Boyd
420
·
3.7K
·
over 16 years

Cosimo wrote:

I could do it...for a price

Is that you Terry?

Trialist
40
·
130
·
over 10 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

Djinksta wrote:

I've said for years Lia is horrendous. He come on, and not even 10 minutes later, costs us the game. Poor pass backward toward Sigmund who miscontrolls and boom. Goal. He offers the Phoenix nothing going forward, or going back. Should never have made the pass in the first place. You've all said he's good, just not good enough to do Riera's job. Except, last season he did nothing even when Riera was in the team, except Riera was covering his ass.

*Ugh*. Watch the pass from Lia again. When you watch the replay, the fault is not Lia's

It's not just the pass itself. Bad decision to pass back to sigmund when at best he'd have had to hit the pass first time. Lia gets turned around too easily. Then gives up and plays the pass backward. Yes Sigmund slipped and lost the ball but he should never have gotten it in the first place

Phoenix Academy
43
·
500
·
over 12 years

Puts his hand over his face and coughs the word "Bullshit"... Siggy was on his heels, needed to take one step forward but stretched as though he wasn't expecting the pass.. 

We have leaked like a sieve for two years but the two CB's keep coming up smelling of roses..

Trialist
40
·
130
·
over 10 years

Dino11 wrote:

Puts his hand over his face and coughs the word "Bullshit"... Siggy was on his heels, needed to take one step forward but stretched as though he wasn't expecting the pass.. 

We have leaked like a sieve for two years but the two CB's keep coming up smelling of roses..

It was a bad pass. Obviously that doesn't take away the fact he stuffed the touch. Our defending at crosses has always been awful, yet our CB's have never been switched out. I agree its time for a change.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

Smithy wrote:

I think your confidence in Boxall over Siggie is mostly optimism more than demonstrated fact. 

But other than that I agree, they are reaching the ends of their careers. 

I agree, it is being optimistic. The alternative is two starting CBs next year of which one is nearing 35 and the other is 33 and with aging, they are heading more towards vinegar rather than a fine wine. We may have seen that already but if we are being honest, 100 goals in 2 seasons mean that if the same old keeps happening (and the signs were there Saturday) they can't be given free licence to see the whole season out as the starting CB partnership regardless of the alternatives or their service to the club.
Starting XI
430
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

Re: Brockie - I wouldn't be surprised if the next few games are the last chance for him to shine or Merrick will start moving him on. Happened last season with Leo - Ernie gave him a shot by starting him for his first two games (after AWs), then moved to being used a bit as a sub, then goneski.

Starting XI
1.6K
·
2.6K
·
about 17 years

Bevan wrote:

It's not a fact.

It's an opinion.

Look, it's arguing semantics, but I believe I was stating facts, at least the opinion of our front five being a bit underdone was based on facts.  And looking at it a bit more closely I am even more inclined to say we were underdone before Perth.

Rodriquez had not played for three weeks before the Sydney game.  And he played only 45mins of that. 

The week before that we played without Rodriquez v Jets and played nearly half the game against 10.  That was McG's first game for us, he was not match fit and faded in that game.  The other game in Sydney was all the rest of the squad.

I believe it is a fact that those are the only serious games we have had with the current starting combination in their current roles.  That's 45mins with Riera, Rodriquez, McG and Rolly together against decent opposition.

JD's claim that we'd had a month together unchanged is simply wrong.

Then against Canterbury United, Ernie had made mega subs by half time.  I turned up late and none of the combinations I wanted to see together were on the pitch.

So including the CU game I believe it is a fact that Rodriquez's match play combination with Rolly and Riera was at most 90mins long, before we played Perth.  None of that is opinion.  I am either correct or wrong on the facts.  Correct me if I am wrong. Maybe I am.

The guts of what I was saying was that we will improve, because we had not had as much time together as you'd think, or like.  I'm sticking with that opinion.

On top of that limited time together, Burns, Rolly and McG are all being asked to play in unfamiliar roles, to varying degrees. I think that much is also fact, not opinion. Plus I'd argue Rodriquez's role has changed substantially with both he and Rolly playing with Riera, compared to the role he played earlier in the FU games.  I'm definitely looking forward to seeing these guys develop together through the season.

WeeNix
120
·
730
·
over 14 years

Well, that was strange. 

I was at the ground and watched the game live, and at the end we were all (my bunch) pretty despondent. I think that this was simply the legacy of the God-awful end to last season, and it was another loss after all. 

I just watched the game again on Sky, and came away feeling completely different- we actually played really well, high energy, commitment, and we could easily have been three up after 20 minutes. They should also have been down to 10 men after Albert recieved his (heart stopping) studs up assault. The only problems we really had were that (a) Perf played much better than anyone here expected, (b) Danny is a great keeper, (c) the Perf lads are roughly twice the size of our team, (d) there were a couple of unlucky mistakes from our boys.

That's it. Watch it again if you don't believe me.

This is the best Phoenix team we have ever had- if Brockie fires we are guaranteed a Finals spot (to be fair to him, too, he actually worked a lot harder in this game). I am still waiting to see Kenny and Roy fit into the squad, with or without Jezza.

Meanwhile I'm doing my best to re-align my Prediction Mojo.....

valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

Grandadi wrote:

Well, that was strange. 

I was at the ground and watched the game live, and at the end we were all (my bunch) pretty despondent. I think that this was simply the legacy of the God-awful end to last season, and it was another loss after all. 

I just watched the game again on Sky, and came away feeling completely different- we actually played really well, high energy, commitment, and we could easily have been three up after 20 minutes. They should also have been down to 10 men after Albert recieved his (heart stopping) studs up assault.

Hmm..we got obliterated in the first 15 mins - could've been down 2 or 3 goals easily. We looked nervy. After that, we had a 15-20 min period of dominance where we should've scored.

Any other ref and Roly would've likely been sent off too.. Had ~3 fouls after already getting a yellow.

Starting XI
1.6K
·
2.6K
·
about 17 years

We had a friend at home crook watching it on TV and he said much the same.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
almost 12 years

Grandadi wrote:

Well, that was strange. 

I was at the ground and watched the game live, and at the end we were all (my bunch) pretty despondent. I think that this was simply the legacy of the God-awful end to last season, and it was another loss after all. 

I just watched the game again on Sky, and came away feeling completely different- we actually played really well, high energy, commitment, and we could easily have been three up after 20 minutes. They should also have been down to 10 men after Albert recieved his (heart stopping) studs up assault. The only problems we really had were that (a) Perf played much better than anyone here expected, (b) Danny is a great keeper, (c) the Perf lads are roughly twice the size of our team, (d) there were a couple of unlucky mistakes from our boys.

That's it. Watch it again if you don't believe me.

This is the best Phoenix team we have ever had- if Brockie fires we are guaranteed a Finals spot (to be fair to him, too, he actually worked a lot harder in this game). I am still waiting to see Kenny and Roy fit into the squad, with or without Jezza.

Meanwhile I'm doing my best to re-align my Prediction Mojo.....

Almost a LOL. Let's hope a) no other teams play better than expected b) other keepers aren't so great c) we get to play against dwarves d) NO MORE MISTAKES. All unlikely. 

NB The last game I saw live at ROF was Nix 0 Heart 5. Your conditions probably applied for that game too. Also left pretty despondent.

WeeNix
120
·
730
·
over 14 years

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Grandadi wrote:

Well, that was strange. 

I was at the ground and watched the game live, and at the end we were all (my bunch) pretty despondent. I think that this was simply the legacy of the God-awful end to last season, and it was another loss after all. 

I just watched the game again on Sky, and came away feeling completely different- we actually played really well, high energy, commitment, and we could easily have been three up after 20 minutes. They should also have been down to 10 men after Albert recieved his (heart stopping) studs up assault. The only problems we really had were that (a) Perf played much better than anyone here expected, (b) Danny is a great keeper, (c) the Perf lads are roughly twice the size of our team, (d) there were a couple of unlucky mistakes from our boys.

That's it. Watch it again if you don't believe me.

This is the best Phoenix team we have ever had- if Brockie fires we are guaranteed a Finals spot (to be fair to him, too, he actually worked a lot harder in this game). I am still waiting to see Kenny and Roy fit into the squad, with or without Jezza.

Meanwhile I'm doing my best to re-align my Prediction Mojo.....

Almost a LOL. Let's hope a) no other teams play better than expected b) other keepers aren't so great c) we get to play against dwarves d) NO MORE MISTAKES. All unlikely. 

NB The last game I saw live at ROF was Nix 0 Heart 5. Your conditions probably applied for that game too. Also left pretty despondent.

We shall see........

Marquee
3.8K
·
5.9K
·
over 17 years

Jerzy Merino wrote:

NB The last game I saw live at ROF was Nix 0 Heart 5. Your conditions probably applied for that game too. Also left pretty despondent.

Great thanks for that,that game had been consigned to the it was a bad dream part of the memory and you have gone and stuffed that up.
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
almost 16 years

GD. My take from the live game was the same as yours from the replay.

Don't think I'll watch it again!

Starting XI
430
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

ballane wrote:

Jerzy Merino wrote:

NB The last game I saw live at ROF was Nix 0 Heart 5. Your conditions probably applied for that game too. Also left pretty despondent.

Great thanks for that,that game had been consigned to the it was a bad dream part of the memory and you have gone and stuffed that up.

I still have nightmares about that thunderbolt from Engelaar.

WeeNix
130
·
650
·
over 10 years

Ard Choille wrote:

One thing from this game. Slow down when singing the Roly chant.
Sounds like one long drunken slur when sung so fast.

And put a pause between the verses of twist n shout; it gives joiners the opportunity to prepare

And dont miss out the twanging guitar of Mr paul mcartney....

End of verse....then

Duh, duh duh duh duh.....duh duh duh duh x4

Then ahhhhh.....ahhhhhh......ahhhhhh......ahhhhhhhhhh

Pause......hold it wait for the leader.....

Shake it up baby now and off you go again....easy

The key to sustaining a chant is pace.....let it develop and people will join in.

And dont complain you dont know the words.....if four scousers can learn it so can you.

Google I

U Turning
190
·
740
·
over 14 years

mjp2 wrote:

Bevan wrote:

It's not a fact.

It's an opinion.

Look, it's arguing semantics, but I believe I was stating facts, at least the opinion of our front five being a bit underdone was based on facts.  And looking at it a bit more closely I am even more inclined to say we were underdone before Perth.

Rodriquez had not played for three weeks before the Sydney game.  And he played only 45mins of that. 

The week before that we played without Rodriquez v Jets and played nearly half the game against 10.  That was McG's first game for us, he was not match fit and faded in that game.  The other game in Sydney was all the rest of the squad.

I believe it is a fact that those are the only serious games we have had with the current starting combination in their current roles.  That's 45mins with Riera, Rodriquez, McG and Rolly together against decent opposition.

JD's claim that we'd had a month together unchanged is simply wrong.

Then against Canterbury United, Ernie had made mega subs by half time.  I turned up late and none of the combinations I wanted to see together were on the pitch.

So including the CU game I believe it is a fact that Rodriquez's match play combination with Rolly and Riera was at most 90mins long, before we played Perth.  None of that is opinion.  I am either correct or wrong on the facts.  Correct me if I am wrong. Maybe I am.

The guts of what I was saying was that we will improve, because we had not had as much time together as you'd think, or like.  I'm sticking with that opinion.

On top of that limited time together, Burns, Rolly and McG are all being asked to play in unfamiliar roles, to varying degrees. I think that much is also fact, not opinion. Plus I'd argue Rodriquez's role has changed substantially with both he and Rolly playing with Riera, compared to the role he played earlier in the FU games.  I'm definitely looking forward to seeing these guys develop together through the season.

Good post. Can't wait to watch our progress in next month. Perth would've blown more than a few sides away last Sunday - they were straight into combos and up for it prep-wise. We looked a couple of top games shy. I'm all positive about this. I wanted (for years here) a midfield of quality and depth, and have it now. Can't get the quality midfield, the RIGHT top striker, and the RIGHT defender cover all at once. 

First Team Squad
100
·
1.2K
·
over 15 years

mjp2 wrote:

Bevan wrote:

It's not a fact.

It's an opinion.

Look, it's arguing semantics, but I believe I was stating facts, at least the opinion of our front five being a bit underdone was based on facts.  And looking at it a bit more closely I am even more inclined to say we were underdone before Perth.

Rodriquez had not played for three weeks before the Sydney game.  And he played only 45mins of that. 

The week before that we played without Rodriquez v Jets and played nearly half the game against 10.  That was McG's first game for us, he was not match fit and faded in that game.  The other game in Sydney was all the rest of the squad.

I believe it is a fact that those are the only serious games we have had with the current starting combination in their current roles.  That's 45mins with Riera, Rodriquez, McG and Rolly together against decent opposition.

JD's claim that we'd had a month together unchanged is simply wrong.

Then against Canterbury United, Ernie had made mega subs by half time.  I turned up late and none of the combinations I wanted to see together were on the pitch.

So including the CU game I believe it is a fact that Rodriquez's match play combination with Rolly and Riera was at most 90mins long, before we played Perth.  None of that is opinion.  I am either correct or wrong on the facts.  Correct me if I am wrong. Maybe I am.

The guts of what I was saying was that we will improve, because we had not had as much time together as you'd think, or like.  I'm sticking with that opinion.

On top of that limited time together, Burns, Rolly and McG are all being asked to play in unfamiliar roles, to varying degrees. I think that much is also fact, not opinion. Plus I'd argue Rodriquez's role has changed substantially with both he and Rolly playing with Riera, compared to the role he played earlier in the FU games.  I'm definitely looking forward to seeing these guys develop together through the season.

This. Its not about excuses for the loss, I think we all expected better. Its about reasons for believing there will be improvement.

It seems that the squad has had a good preseason, the starting 11 less so, so lets give them a few games before passing judgement on the season. I think we are capable of a lot more than we displayed against Perth.

WeeNix
170
·
510
·
over 10 years

Its Tuesday and still everyone is harping on about Sunday's game. Let it go..lolz focus on Saturdays Game

Starting XI
300
·
4K
·
over 17 years

It's funny because if we win on Saturday, the change in people will be amazing on this forum. Everyone will be happy again ha

WeeNix
230
·
570
·
about 13 years

NHpeter wrote:

It's funny because if we win on Saturday, the change in people will be amazing on this forum. Everyone will be happy again ha


I'm prepared to put the disappointing result down to first game of the season and look forward to a successful season. However, if we lose to Perth at home, then alarm bells should be ringing
The basis of a good season is no secret:
- win at home consistently, accept a blip or two and move on to the next game 
- win against a team that has the longest away trip
- win against a team that is at our level, at least in terms of expectation of success by other teams in the league   
- happiness with your team is based on consistency of results, win at home (accept the occasional draw/loss), draw away with the occasional bonus of a win
Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

Ryan54 wrote:

I reckon Weemac needs to be given freedom to roam. He is better when he is allowed to pop up on both sides of the field.

This. And Rodriguez. 

Which is kinda our problem maybe...

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

Fenix wrote:

Steve-O wrote:
This is what happens when you have statistically the worst defence in the league and you bring ONE new player into that defence from the ASB Premiership. End result = defence is still rubbish.

Gorrin was anonymous, Roly was involved but ultimately ineffective and other than the goal, McGlinchey struggled a bit. Burns should scored at least once. Brockie was as expected, crap. He cannot lead the line to save himself.

Got to question Ernie today too. No plan B at all, brings on Krishna on 90 minutes, and at 1-1 when we're trying to push on and win a game he brings on Vinnie Lia who manages to play a big part in us losing, and then misses a decent chance to equalise by a mile.

Very disappointing result and performance, bar about 15 minutes in the first half.

Pretty fair summing up

Yep. Ernie made a tactical switcheroo in his first game which had us all praising him. He stuck to his knitting here and did nothing with what wasn't happening. Don't remember Lia shooting?? 

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

Fenix wrote:

Very disappointing after the pre-season.

Our midfield all looked too similar, didn't seem to give us much variety or width.

Hoping Rodriguez and Roly aren't Gerrard and Lampard in their ability to synch. Pedigrees, check. Results: waiting. Certainly Gorrin looked the goods against the Prem teams and seemed very quiet today...

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years

Smithy wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Smithy wrote:

You can't just get rid of them though, they're on contract. There is a salary cap. Etc etc.

That's correct but there needs to be serious questions asked if they are offered further extensions before their contracts are up. Even then, it may be 1 year at the most and coming off the bench and you would only do 1 of them, not both.

By the end of this season, Sigmund will be 34 and Durante will be nearly 33. Sigmund is off contract and Durante has another year. You would like to think that by the end of this year, Sigmund and Boxall have swapped places otherwise we are in a bit of bother.

The other thing is that they are both captain and vice-captain so there is no succession plan. The only ones I can think of is McGlinchey as he did it for CCM or Moss but I would prefer my captain to be in the field so he can speak with the referee if needed. By the same token, Moss strikes me as having a more commanding personality than McGlinchey.

 

I think your confidence in Boxall over Siggie is mostly optimism more than demonstrated fact. 

But other than that I agree, they are reaching the ends of their careers. 

We all WANT Boxall to be great (or at least I do) but running out of time to see it.

I think also there an important point about leaders.  While they may be on the downward slope both Siggie and Durante are real leaders, and show real personality on the pitch.  The rest of them not so much - I do think we lacked leaders badly last year and still looks a bit the same for me.  Siggie has his flaws but he has passion and you can't fake that.  It's an underrated quality

Here's a quote from, of all people, Philip Lahm who believes the most important thing in football is not pace, technique, or intelligence. No. The most essential quality in the game is passion. 

“Passion is an emotion that liberates reserves of energy you didn’t know you had,” he writes.

He adds: “With passion, one player – one player alone – can lift the performance of a whole team. It’s not a question of his technical ability . . . but of his character, his devotion to his team and to the game. The passionate player does things other players won’t do. He chases a ball that looks lost, and if he gets it . . . it’s not just a ball-recovery, it’s a signal: see? we can do it! if only we want it enough, if we go for it with absolute commitment.”

Starting XI
460
·
2.3K
·
over 17 years

martinb wrote:

..... Don't remember Lia shooting?? 

Late late free header (albeit not from an 'gimme' position)
Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

james dean wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Smithy wrote:

You can't just get rid of them though, they're on contract. There is a salary cap. Etc etc.

That's correct but there needs to be serious questions asked if they are offered further extensions before their contracts are up. Even then, it may be 1 year at the most and coming off the bench and you would only do 1 of them, not both.

By the end of this season, Sigmund will be 34 and Durante will be nearly 33. Sigmund is off contract and Durante has another year. You would like to think that by the end of this year, Sigmund and Boxall have swapped places otherwise we are in a bit of bother.

The other thing is that they are both captain and vice-captain so there is no succession plan. The only ones I can think of is McGlinchey as he did it for CCM or Moss but I would prefer my captain to be in the field so he can speak with the referee if needed. By the same token, Moss strikes me as having a more commanding personality than McGlinchey.

 

I think your confidence in Boxall over Siggie is mostly optimism more than demonstrated fact. 

But other than that I agree, they are reaching the ends of their careers. 

We all WANT Boxall to be great (or at least I do) but running out of time to see it.

I think also there an important point about leaders.  While they may be on the downward slope both Siggie and Durante are real leaders, and show real personality on the pitch.  The rest of them not so much - I do think we lacked leaders badly last year and still looks a bit the same for me.  Siggie has his flaws but he has passion and you can't fake that.  It's an underrated quality

Here's a quote from, of all people, Philip Lahm who believes the most important thing in football is not pace, technique, or intelligence. No. The most essential quality in the game is passion. 

“Passion is an emotion that liberates reserves of energy you didn’t know you had,” he writes.

He adds: “With passion, one player – one player alone – can lift the performance of a whole team. It’s not a question of his technical ability . . . but of his character, his devotion to his team and to the game. The passionate player does things other players won’t do. He chases a ball that looks lost, and if he gets it . . . it’s not just a ball-recovery, it’s a signal: see? we can do it! if only we want it enough, if we go for it with absolute commitment.”

Yep was thinking that. 

Looking back here's who I think of as passionate for the 'Nix from the early days: Daniel, Smeltz and Brown...Players who'll get the other players going and the fans...Sure there are others, but those jump out at me. I came back to a live game in Welly after coming down twice in Season 2 and for the Bocca game. There seemed like a bit of a disconnect between the team and the fans and the club and the city this time...First time (maybe cos of how I did the trip) it seemed like the Phoenix was fizzing on game day...this time the city seemed quite quiet and with the players they seem gifted, but none has sown their heart on the sleeve and won over the Zone yet...

Kenny gets fired up and we missed him for sure.

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years

mjp2 wrote:

Bevan wrote:

It's not a fact.

It's an opinion.

Look, it's arguing semantics, but I believe I was stating facts, at least the opinion of our front five being a bit underdone was based on facts.  And looking at it a bit more closely I am even more inclined to say we were underdone before Perth.

Rodriquez had not played for three weeks before the Sydney game.  And he played only 45mins of that. 

The week before that we played without Rodriquez v Jets and played nearly half the game against 10.  That was McG's first game for us, he was not match fit and faded in that game.  The other game in Sydney was all the rest of the squad.

I believe it is a fact that those are the only serious games we have had with the current starting combination in their current roles.  That's 45mins with Riera, Rodriquez, McG and Rolly together against decent opposition.

JD's claim that we'd had a month together unchanged is simply wrong.

Then against Canterbury United, Ernie had made mega subs by half time.  I turned up late and none of the combinations I wanted to see together were on the pitch.

So including the CU game I believe it is a fact that Rodriquez's match play combination with Rolly and Riera was at most 90mins long, before we played Perth.  None of that is opinion.  I am either correct or wrong on the facts.  Correct me if I am wrong. Maybe I am.

The guts of what I was saying was that we will improve, because we had not had as much time together as you'd think, or like.  I'm sticking with that opinion.

On top of that limited time together, Burns, Rolly and McG are all being asked to play in unfamiliar roles, to varying degrees. I think that much is also fact, not opinion. Plus I'd argue Rodriquez's role has changed substantially with both he and Rolly playing with Riera, compared to the role he played earlier in the FU games.  I'm definitely looking forward to seeing these guys develop together through the season.

Our preparation is entirely within our control.  If we go into the season underdone, and other teams go into the season well prepared with their combinations working, then I am not willing to say "oh well that's fine, we were a bit underdone".  I look at that as a problem with our build up.  The team have been prepping for 5 months!

Anyway, next game we can hopefully get rid of the nerves and start afresh.  Season starts here!

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

I don't think we've been tested in a game situation in over a month. That fair? And apparently we had a game against ACFC lined up that we pulled out of.

Starting XI
1.6K
·
2.6K
·
about 17 years

sure JD

You might note that I did not state "oh well that's fine, we were a bit underdone". 

What I did say was we were more underdone than I thought Ernie had made out and more underdone than I perceived most had probably been thinking.  Including myself.  Just 45mins of our starting front 6 together, 90mins if they played the first half of the CU game that I missed.

I certainly did not intend to suggest that was a good thing, nor "that's fine". 

What I was saying was it gives some hope that we will improve significantly with more time together. 

imho we'll need to.  Looking forward to seeing it happen.

Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

martinb wrote:

I don't think we've been tested in a game situation in over a month. That fair? And apparently we had a game against ACFC lined up that we pulled out of.

We had a game against WSW lined up that they pulled out of after making the ACL semi final. 

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

martinb wrote:

I don't think we've been tested in a game situation in over a month. That fair? And apparently we had a game against ACFC lined up that we pulled out of.

We had a game against WSW lined up that they pulled out of after making the ACL semi final. 

I was told by some people who know some ACFC people that the 'Nix were going to play them in Welly and it got canned by the 'Nix

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Hard to line up good opposition when they are playing in the FFA cup and ACL.

If we made it through the FFA cup we would have had a great pre-season.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up

You need to be logged in to do that!