See at 26 seconds the orange boot of the defender clips his leg...
and the best angle is at 52 seconds which is the angle they don't show on the videos at stuff or Fox Sports Australia...
There is no foul there.
Wow. Clear as day to me. Funny how two people can look at the same thing and see it completely differently.
If you say there is no foul, are you saying there was no contact with Krishna's foot and that therefore Krishna tapped his own leg to simulate an ankle tap?
Or are you saying there was contact, but there was no intent, and so it is not a foul?
Incidental contact, it's just a tangle of legs, there is no trip there.
Erm, where exactly, did I say anything about intent?
Under the laws of the game, 'careless' means that a player has shown 'a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge, or that he acted without precaution'. The very wording of the instruction implies that the offending player needs to be actively making a challenge, or interfering with the opponent.
That clearly doesn't apply in this situation - all there is are two players running in the same direction, whose legs tangle up and one of them ends up on his arse. But no part of the defending player is acting in either careless, reckless, or using excessive force manner, so there's no foul there.