The panel meeting decided that both have a case to answer but interestingly the clause has not been spelled out in Manny's case. It has been spelled out in O'Donovan's case (obvious error by referee), and the hearing will be disciplinary. The panel will be seeing them separately (Tuesday for Manny, Wednesday for Roy), under separate clauses.
http://www.a-league.com.au/article/manny-muscat-an...
My own uneducated guess is that they will want Manny's view on the matter and if they decide his earlier elbow (which presumably aggravated Roy O'Donovan and may have given him the shiner) merited a yellow then he would have got two yellows that game and may get one match ban for this, missing our Sunday game against Brisbane. It looks however that O'Donovan will be given a more serious treatment because of the clause used; possibly just due to the serious nature of his retaliation - whether Manny chased him and gave him verbal grief or for the earlier elbow, or whatever else. I can be completely wrong of course.