Current version

Posted February 19, 2015 03:34 · last edited February 19, 2015 03:35

valeo wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

I am quite happy about that. Its a change I wanted to see anyway.

Edit: not the injury. Poor guy, but the football change.

Why is that? Boxall is good coming on for 20 mins every now and then, but he isn't a full-back. He doesn't get behind defences, and he is easily outpaced. Fenton is a big loss, which most people likely wont recognise until after the game.

From last season:

Merrick said Boxall was the fastest in the squad over 20m

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/9575274/Michael-Boxall-to-replace-injured-Fenton-at-back

Previous versions

1 version
Bullion edited February 19, 2015 03:35
valeo wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
Ryan's Rovers wrote:

[/quote] I am quite happy about that. Its a change I wanted to see anyway.

Edit: not the injury. Poor guy, but the football change.

Why is that? Boxall is good coming on for 20 mins every now and then, but he isn't a full-back. He doesn't get behind defences, and he is easily outpaced. Fenton is a big loss, which most people likely wont recognise until after the game.

From last season:

[quote]Merrick said Boxall was the fastest in the squad over 20m

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/9575274/Michael-Boxall-to-replace-injured-Fenton-at-back