Current version

Posted February 22, 2014 01:52 · last edited February 22, 2014 01:53

Blew.2 wrote:
Arsenal wrote:

I'll admit, I've never quite understood wtf that 'player influence' chart is supposed to illustrate. 

IMO - the bigger the name the more influence they had on the game for the good of the team. The first 10 min it looks like CCM were targeting Boxall side
I always assumed that it was number of passes, headers, tackles, interceptions, shots etc combined to give the relative size of the name and then where the name is on the pitch is the average point on the pitch where those touches took place

Previous versions

1 version
ConanTroutman edited February 22, 2014 01:53
Blew.2 wrote:
Arsenal wrote:

I'll admit, I've never quite understood wtf that 'player influence' chart is supposed to illustrate. 

IMO - the bigger the name the more influence they had on the game for the good of the team. The first 10 min it looks like CCM were targeting Boxall side
I always assumed that it was number of passes, headers, tackles, interceptions, shots etc combined to give the relative size of the name and then where the name is on the pitch is the average of where those touches took place