Current version

Posted March 12, 2018 12:04 · last edited March 12, 2018 12:06

james dean wrote:

Fenix wrote:

james dean wrote:

Fenix wrote:

clowns wrote:

Hamill shouldn't be on the park after that clothesline earlier

We shouldn't drop this. VAR or not, he ended up head butting him out of the attack, a red card in anyones book, or at least mine.

And for VAR to just gloss over shows how stupid the system that we currently have is, it appears not that VAR officials are directed to not interfere unless, I dunno. its "essential".  Its a joke, the game, the league , the system

Horrible, cynical foul.  But under what law of the game would it qualify as a red?

violent conduct. He was head butted.

That foul is the perfect argument for a sin bin in football.  But it wasn't violent conduct

Why ? - cant it be dealt with/or not under the correct application of the current Laws of the game ?

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 12, 2018 12:06
james dean wrote:
Fenix wrote:
james dean wrote:
Fenix wrote:
clowns wrote:

Hamill shouldn't be on the park after that clothesline earlier

We shouldn't drop this. VAR or not, he ended up head butting him out of the attack, a red card in anyones book, or at least mine.

And for VAR to just gloss over shows how stupid the system that we currently have is, it appears not that VAR officials are directed to not interfere unless, I dunno. its "essential".  Its a joke, the game, the league , the system

Horrible, cynical foul.  But under what law of the game would it qualify as a red?

violent conduct. He was head butted.

That foul is the perfect argument for a sin bin in football.  But it wasn't violent conduct

Why ? - cant it be dealt with under the correct application of the current Laws of the game ?