Wellington Phoenix Men

R3 vs Sydney | Sun 23 Oct | 7:00pm | ROF

372 replies · 35,096 views
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

And the thing is the team played really well Yesterday, and have had narrow losses to three teams that are amongst the favorites for the title.

There has been woeful officiating in all three games. That has to be said, and we have been stitched up like a kipper as a result.

But this aint the Premier League with millions of $ riding on it, we actually do need to provide some entertainment even if we end up bottom of the league. Playing kids football where everybody chases the ball down the middle and there is no width and where we spend most of the game obsessed with stats and passing the thing backwards just aint gonna cut it.

Yesterday was a piss poor game of ping pong football. The shape of our front 6 is horrid, and very frustrating to watch. It may have worked for a while with Burns and Riera, but I don't think it suits the current players at all.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Id like to apologise whole-heartedly for my poorly executed attempt at humour that was aimed at Sarah Jones.

To be honest she is not really my type anyway. I dont really like football match officials! 

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

The distasteful comments being mentioned were sexist remarks about Sarah Jones' performance yesterday, which have been removed. Think the confusion stems from you guys not being able to see the really horrid stuff that was posted.

There is no need to be sexist about it, but I do think we have had three shark refs and one shark lino so far this season.

We should expect that people appointed to this level have years of experience.

Offside is easier to call with the benefit of TV replay, we all know that, but given what we have seen to date this season, you have to wonder at the officials' development program. Basics like tackling from behind, not retreating for free kicks and diving/time wasting are not being addressed properly.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Is there a chance for our friendly referee on this forum to give some insight into general standard of reffing in A-League this season so far:

- pretty much same as always?

- improved?

- not as good as it used to be?

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

99% EPL offside calls are correct. That's is a pretty good rate. Wonder about A-League stats.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Fenix wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

The distasteful comments being mentioned were sexist remarks about Sarah Jones' performance yesterday, which have been removed. Think the confusion stems from you guys not being able to see the really horrid stuff that was posted.

There is no need to be sexist about it, but I do think we have had three shark refs and one shark lino so far this season.

We should expect that people appointed to this level have years of experience.

Offside is easier to call with the benefit of TV replay, we all know that, but given what we have seen to date this season, you have to wonder at the officials' development program. Basics like tackling from behind, not retreating for free kicks and diving/time wasting are not being addressed properly.

Ummm all officials have more than years of experience. Heck, the best AR in Wellington, Mark Whitehead, wasn't selected for the A-League this season. And other than Conger, none of our Kiwi ref's are anywhere near the level that FFA requires to be considered for the A-League.

Also I highly recommend  you read the new Laws of the Game, as the law around retreating from a free kick has changed from previous seasons.

Wholeheartedly agree about being able to discuss officials without bringing gender into the equation at all.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

number8 wrote:

99% EPL offside calls are correct. That's is a pretty good rate. Wonder about A-League stats.

To clarify - that's 99% of offside calls where play is stopped for offsides. It doesn't count instances where there was a call to make and the official hasn't raised their flag (either correctly or incorrectly).

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

yellowsite wrote:

Mikillc wrote:

Really liking Tratt, he plays with confidence and backs himself.

I thought him cutting in (obviosly under instruction) and going for a gallop was naive and was caught out.

to me it looked like he only did that because everyone else was static and wasn't giving him an option to pass
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

The distasteful comments being mentioned were sexist remarks about Sarah Jones' performance yesterday, which have been removed. Think the confusion stems from you guys not being able to see the really horrid stuff that was posted.

AH thanks for clarifying Patrick.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Watching the Chelsea v Manu game last night and a replay of a Chelsea goal looked familiar to Sunday.

But we all must remember

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago · edited over 9 years ago · History

Yeah stop blaming officials and blame the coach, he sucks too many loses 

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

The distasteful comments being mentioned were sexist remarks about Sarah Jones' performance yesterday, which have been removed. Think the confusion stems from you guys not being able to see the really horrid stuff that was posted.

Then thank you for removing it.  Not necessary at all.  She;s not the first AR to get a tight offside wrong.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Yeah stop blaming officials and blame the coach, he sucks too many loses 

Looks like Ernie is only as good as Jose Mourinho and so I am prepared to cut him some slack.

Actually, getting outplayed quite a bit these days

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Vince Lia made the HAL team of the week. First 'Nix player to do so this season.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

Fenix wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

The distasteful comments being mentioned were sexist remarks about Sarah Jones' performance yesterday, which have been removed. Think the confusion stems from you guys not being able to see the really horrid stuff that was posted.

There is no need to be sexist about it, but I do think we have had three shark refs and one shark lino so far this season.

We should expect that people appointed to this level have years of experience.

Offside is easier to call with the benefit of TV replay, we all know that, but given what we have seen to date this season, you have to wonder at the officials' development program. Basics like tackling from behind, not retreating for free kicks and diving/time wasting are not being addressed properly.

Ummm all officials have more than years of experience. Heck, the best AR in Wellington, Mark Whitehead, wasn't selected for the A-League this season. And other than Conger, none of our Kiwi ref's are anywhere near the level that FFA requires to be considered for the A-League.

Also I highly recommend  you read the new Laws of the Game, as the law around retreating from a free kick has changed from previous seasons.

Wholeheartedly agree about being able to discuss officials without bringing gender into the equation at all.

law 13, "an opponent who deliberately prevents a free kick being taken quickly must be cautioned for delaying the restart of play."This hasnt been applied consistently.
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Bullion wrote:

Vince Lia made the HAL team of the week. First 'Nix player to do so this season.

Genuinely think that was one of his best games in a Nix shirt

a.haak

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

aitkenmike wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

The distasteful comments being mentioned were sexist remarks about Sarah Jones' performance yesterday, which have been removed. Think the confusion stems from you guys not being able to see the really horrid stuff that was posted.

Then thank you for removing it.  Not necessary at all.  She;s not the first AR to get a tight offside wrong.

And sadly she will not be the last. A League match officials have not improved since day 1 of the A League. As I said, why is it the FFA always seem to choose Phoenix games to give match officials their debuts in? They know that they will make mistakes but hey, it's only the Kiwis so we dont give a fudge attitude that annoys me. The other guy got Krishna's offside wrong too......unless someone has a pic if it side on. Whilst not happy with yet another loss, I am happy with how we tried to play. It was a lot more positive and not a We Give Up attitude.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Bullion wrote:

Vince Lia made the HAL team of the week. First 'Nix player to do so this season.

another year contract getting prepared. To be honest, I dislike him immensely but he has played alot better than roly this season...

yung thug

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Saw the first half replay when I was at the gym todayt

We were pretty good, looked the better team

Gives me confidence for later

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

On the one hand it is hard to tell close offsides in real time. On the other hand, that is the AR's job so the "it's hard" excuse is a bit weak at this level

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't
Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

aitkenmike wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

The distasteful comments being mentioned were sexist remarks about Sarah Jones' performance yesterday, which have been removed. Think the confusion stems from you guys not being able to see the really horrid stuff that was posted.

Then thank you for removing it.  Not necessary at all.  She;s not the first AR to get a tight offside wrong.

And sadly she will not be the last. A League match officials have not improved since day 1 of the A League. As I said, why is it the FFA always seem to choose Phoenix games to give match officials their debuts in? They know that they will make mistakes but hey, it's only the Kiwis so we dont give a fudge attitude that annoys me. The other guy got Krishna's offside wrong too......unless someone has a pic if it side on. Whilst not happy with yet another loss, I am happy with how we tried to play. It was a lot more positive and not a We Give Up attitude.

Sarah Jones is a New Zealand AR. Don't NZ officials just get Nix games? Correct me if I'm wrong.

It was her first game but doesn't everyone have to get a first game before they can become experienced? And besides, I think she got the Krishna decision absolutely right. It was a close, very difficult and brave call - and she got it right. Hope it's the first of many A-League games for her.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago · edited over 9 years ago · History

sthn.jeff wrote:

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't

He was onside IMO, probably not as clear cut as people think because of the way the wide angle lens distorts the frame, but onside none the less. It was a marginal call though. 

I'd like to see a replay of the offside where Kosta was one on one with the keeper.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't

That camera angle is nowhere near in line. Look at the line mowed into the grass and the distance Krishna is to it compared to the defenders. She is in perfect position there and while it's very close, I believe she made the right decision.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Proving that two sets of eyes will see two different things it seems obvious to me that Krishna is at least a meter onside. If someone more computer savvy than me manages to draw a line across field, taking into account the perspective of the camera angle (and not just simply aligning it with the closest mowing line) then he is very much onside. And the lino is right where she should be. Yet still got it wrong.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago · edited over 9 years ago · History

sthn.jeff wrote:

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't

That camera angle is nowhere near in line. Look at the line mowed into the grass and the distance Krishna is to it compared to the defenders. She is in perfect position there and while it's very close, I believe she made the right decision.

Look at the distortion of the lens  though,  compare the line of the penalty area which is straight to the mowed line which is angled. Because Krishna is closer to the frame he's always going to appear further away from the line than players in the distance. The only way to actually figure it out is to get the lens width and the focal depth of the camera punch that information into a 3d application, like Blender, and overlay a 3d grid.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Outpost wrote:

Proving that two sets of eyes will see two different things it seems obvious to me that Krishna is at least a meter onside. If someone more computer savvy than me manages to draw a line across field, taking into account the perspective of the camera angle (and not just simply aligning it with the closest mowing line) then he is very much onside. And the lino is right where she should be. Yet still got it wrong.

Agree.

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

sthn.jeff wrote:

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't

That camera angle is nowhere near in line. Look at the line mowed into the grass and the distance Krishna is to it compared to the defenders. She is in perfect position there and while it's very close, I believe she made the right decision.

Yeah the angle isn't dead on but I reckon he's level with them, maybe even slightly deeper. The gap between him and the mown strip looks bigger because he's a lot closer to the camera. It's the same reason the box and the strip don't look parallel when in real life they are.

And her position is a red herring. You can be perfectly positioned and still make the wrong call. 

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't

That camera angle is nowhere near in line. Look at the line mowed into the grass and the distance Krishna is to it compared to the defenders. She is in perfect position there and while it's very close, I believe she made the right decision.

Look at the distortion of the lens  though,  compare the line of the penalty area which is straight to the mowed line which is angled. Because Krishna is closer to the frame he's always going to appear further away from the line than players in the distance. The only way to actually figure it out is to get the lens width and the focal depth of the camera punch that information into a 3d application, like Blender, and overlay a 3d grid.

So the only person who is perfectly placed and qualified to know if it was onside or not is the person holding a flag who made the call? ?

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Ryan wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Hard News wrote:

brumbys wrote:

I've only caught a short replay but wasn't Wee Mac off side & attempting to play the ball but missed for the on-side Krishna to slot home? If so I think the linesman is fair to stop the play as Wee Mac was interferring in play.

Don't think that is the one being debated.

1:30 into this video is the one which should have stood. 

should have stood..... if he was actually onside. Which he wasn't

That camera angle is nowhere near in line. Look at the line mowed into the grass and the distance Krishna is to it compared to the defenders. She is in perfect position there and while it's very close, I believe she made the right decision.

Look at the distortion of the lens  though,  compare the line of the penalty area which is straight to the mowed line which is angled. Because Krishna is closer to the frame he's always going to appear further away from the line than players in the distance. The only way to actually figure it out is to get the lens width and the focal depth of the camera punch that information into a 3d application, like Blender, and overlay a 3d grid.

It will live in #NixLevel history as the other officials decisions made gaining experience at Westpac. 

Now watch the EPL AR in goal #? Chelsea v Manu and compare the decisions. 

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Here's a way of looking at it: 

The mown strip and the box are parallel. Therefore you can look at what proportion of the distance between the two lines each player has covered, which eliminates the perspective distortion because you're looking at relative distance not absolute distance on the frame.

Compared to the total distance between the lines at the point they are standing Krishna looks closer to the mown strip than the defenders do. IMO

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

So the only person who is perfectly placed and qualified to know if it was onside or not is the person holding a flag who made the call? ?

A very hard call. Lino looks to see the ball played and then checks the position of the attacker a split second later, and Krishna has moved offside in that split second.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago · edited over 9 years ago · History

Regardless. I think it's clear that it wasn't an outrageously terrible decision by an inexperienced official. It was very close and right or wrong it didn't cost the Phoenix the game.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

hepatitis wrote:

So the only person who is perfectly placed and qualified to know if it was onside or not is the person holding a flag who made the call? ?

A very hard call. Lino looks to see the ball played and then checks the position of the attacker a split second later, and Krishna has moved offside in that split second.

Exactly. Human eyes can't focus on two things 20m apart simultaneously. There's always a split second where the focus has to shift

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 9 years ago

Here's a way of looking at it: 

The mown strip and the box are parallel. Therefore you can look at what proportion of the distance between the two lines each player has covered, which eliminates the perspective distortion because you're looking at relative distance not absolute distance on the frame.

Compared to the total distance between the lines at the point they are standing Krishna looks closer to the mown strip than the defenders do. IMO

Exactly. Draw a line across field from the heel of the far defender taking into account natural spatial perspective and Krishna is nowhere near offside. The lino doesn't have to fart around worrying about perspective like an obsessive Nix fan, she's right there, right in line and she messed it up!

Permalink Permalink