Post history

History for theaucklandphoenixfan

VAR

Back to topic

Current version

Posted January 23, 2024 09:15 · last edited January 23, 2024 09:19

That challenge looks same or slightly worse than Payne’s. In current terms you know it’s going to be a red. 
I agree, neither Paynes or O sheas challenges were serious foul play to me, and contact was relatively low as both about half of their foot made contact above the ankle. 
The RED card should only be used if the tackle has studs that make contact clearly above the ankle. Not for ground challenges that lift their studs at the end, unless they go flying higher above ankle contact.

In current rulings though, both challenges red card is the ‘correct’ decision.
Kind of stupid though for **Phil Moss to call it as a bad decision, we know it’s gonna be a red when it goes to VAR.

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited January 23, 2024 09:19
That challenge looks same or slightly worse than Payne’s. In current terms you know it’s going to be a red. 
I agree, neither Paynes or O sheas challenges were serious foul play to me, and contact was relatively low as both about half of their foot made contact above the ankle. 
The RED card should only be used if the tackle has studs that make contact clearly above the ankle. Not for ground challenges that lift their studs at the end, unless they go flying higher above ankle contact.

In current rulings though, both challenges red card is the ‘correct’ decision.
Unknown editor edited January 23, 2024 09:16
That challenge looks same or slightly worse than Payne’s. In current terms you know it’s going to be a red. 
I agree, neither Paynes or O sheas challenges were serious foul play to me, and contact was relatively low as both about half of their foot made contact above the ankle. 
The RED card should only be used if the tackle has studs that make contact clearly above the ankle. Not for ground challenges that lift their studs at the end, unless they go flying higher above ankle contact.