sthn.jeff wrote:
Playmaker1 wrote:
sthn.jeff has been negative about Hogg from the outset so no surprises with his dull Herbert/Hogg comment.
Agree with Jeff Vader, Think its more of a case first game in 3 months and see how he pulls up. Probably needs a couple of training games to get match fitness. You cant get that overnight.
Should be a good game, just hope we don't sit back and absorb it all and not give it a crack.
The only "negative" I have said about Hogg is that he will not start straight away and in my opinion is only likely to get a run in the event of an injury to Lochy. A number of people have been on his bandwagon suggesting he start straight away, we must get rid of Lochy and Hogg is the answer to all our woes. Call me negative if you like but that is not realistic for someone who played their last competitive match in September. His signing for three months is an extended trial for him with a view to the future more than anything else.
+1