Current version

Posted August 24, 2010 18:24 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:46

This intrigues me, because if was brought in to play central attacking why did he come on at left mid ahead of Daniel who is a proven player in that position. Now, the obvious answer is to give him a chance or whatever because we were ahead comfortably. Okay, if that's the case, then take off Greenacre or MacAllister and play him in the middle. That sub did intrigue me a little.

I'm not saying he would be an automatic starter. Could well be an impact player. New signings don't have to displace a regular.


if i were Ricki (then the Nix and AWs would be in a spot of bother)

but, also, i would have given Toto a job out wide until i were convinced that he wasn't going to make errors in the middle that could prove more costly than if made out wide

edit - and maybe i wouldn't want a repeat of GCU where we lost our outlet up top (Big mac) and consequently got pegged back in our own half too muchtigers2010-08-25 06:26:22

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:46
simon_hampton wrote:
This intrigues me, because if was brought in to play central attacking why did he come on at left mid ahead of Daniel who is a proven player in that position. Now, the obvious answer is to give him a chance or whatever because we were ahead comfortably. Okay, if that's the case, then take off Greenacre or MacAllister and play him in the middle. That sub did intrigue me a little.

I'm not saying he would be an automatic starter. Could well be an impact player. New signings don't have to displace a regular.


if i were Ricki (then the Nix and AWs would be in a spot of bother)

but, also, i would have given Toto a job out wide until i were convinced that he wasn't going to make errors in the middle that could prove more costly than if made out wide

edit - and maybe i wouldn't want a repeat of GCU where we lost our outlet up top (Big mac) and consequently got pegged back in our own half too muchtigers2010-08-25 06:26:22