Pav and Toto aren't the same. Pav is a youth player with all the physical attributes. He has had limited chances and earlier in the season he did create a bit of spark when we were pretty lethargic. I think he will improve and is worth keeping. Toto was really just a gamble and ended up being a mistake, picked up without really seeing him play. He has too many limitations to play at this level.
I wasn't being entirely serious. As for the above, I think we'll agree to disagree on this one