Post history

History for reg22

We need to talk about David

Back to topic

Current version

Posted November 13, 2025 00:29 · last edited November 13, 2025 00:38

From the Phoenix point of view, someone signing a contract on behalf of an entity that does not exist ranges somewhere from naive to deceptive.

From a government point of view, someone signing a non-existant entity up for funding approval, which means trust members and beneficiaries cannot be confirmed and therefore possible conflicts of interest identified is ither significantly more incompetent or incredibly deceptive (but perhaps less surprising).

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited November 13, 2025 00:38
From the Phoenix point of view, someone signing a contract on behalf of an entity that does not exist ranges somewhere from incopentant to deceptive.

From a government point of view, someone signing a non-existant entity up for funding approval, which means trust members and beneficiaries cannot be confirmed and therefore possible conflicts of interest identified is ither significantly more incompetent or incredibly deceptive (but perhaps less surprising).