Hyslop's article actually calls for senior players to go on strike and for staff to revolt.
Any action, from any stakeholder in the game, can't be simply over a new coach having a differing coaching style or formation. It has to be based on failure to implement the Board approved NZF strategic plan, and/or failure to build consensus of direction with key stakeholders (Federation coaches, national coaches, national team players).
If you're speaking truth to power, maybe Hyslop's approach is a legitimate course of action; but how many staff or players will be willing to collectively take such action? And how easy (hard) would that be given logistical and geographical realities?
Alternatively, if you're in a position of power, strike action can achieve a result. The
Real Madrid dressing room has power; but NZF and Fed staff and WNT, U20 and U17 teams?
I'm sure there will be more written in the next few days, but I think key stakeholders (including football media) need to reach out to Board members to have any hope of meaningful change.