Team Wellington... no longer an association with Ole. Chur

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years
WeeNix
0
·
560
·
about 13 years
Blew.2 wrote:

Weekend review

Penalty dictated game 

Oh cummon!!  They had 90 mins to fix that you can't have that as an excuse.  I'm sick of this TW Pheonix BS thing to be honest - why can't TW just put out a decent side win the league FFS they could do it easy.  And how predictable that Peverly would blow a fuse.  Cudos to Canty - Keith out thought Calcott all ends up.  Calcott''s time is up IMO.
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years
NatPevin wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

Weekend review

Penalty dictated game 

Oh cummon!!  They had 90 mins to fix that you can't have that as an excuse.  I'm sick of this TW Pheonix BS thing to be honest - why can't TW just put out a decent side win the league FFS they could do it easy.  And how predictable that Peverly would blow a fuse.  Cudos to Canty - Keith out thought Calcott all ends up.  Calcott''s time is up IMO.

lol - have Steinekin and relax
WeeNix
0
·
560
·
about 13 years
Blew.2 wrote:
NatPevin wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

Weekend review

Penalty dictated game 

Oh cummon!!  They had 90 mins to fix that you can't have that as an excuse.  I'm sick of this TW Pheonix BS thing to be honest - why can't TW just put out a decent side win the league FFS they could do it easy.  And how predictable that Peverly would blow a fuse.  Cudos to Canty - Keith out thought Calcott all ends up.  Calcott''s time is up IMO.

lol - have Steinekin and relax
I feel relaxed Blew  - it's sunday night, I feel very relaxed.  I have some Wellington affections and connections.  I'm pissed off because you are gonna finish outside the top four at this rate and it's long overdue for TW to be in the OCL…grrrr.  So I'm pissed off yeah look out….but quite relaxed.  Hic.
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years
WeeNix
0
·
560
·
about 13 years
Blew.2 wrote:


And that's the point, Blew - that's the point.
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Not sure you've made very clear what your point is, other than TW not currently winning the league...

Marquee
540
·
6.9K
·
about 15 years
Blew.2 wrote:

Weekend review

Penalty dictated game 

Also TW piss poor finishing played  a big part as well. 

 

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years

On the day the better team wins. Does not make them the better team over a season . Manu lose to NCU - MV lose to NJ and on we go. CU did well last year and came close, but so did TW the year before. 

IMO ChCh united would have the same budget as TW but it's a big leap to ACFC. So all ASB teams do the best they can on the day. Waitak draw with HBU, ..the gap is closing  - double  hic. Still at Bar Stool Investment Convention  

Marquee
540
·
6.9K
·
about 15 years
NatPevin wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

Weekend review

Penalty dictated game 

Oh cummon!!  They had 90 mins to fix that you can't have that as an excuse.  I'm sick of this TW Pheonix BS thing to be honest - why can't TW just put out a decent side win the league FFS they could do it easy.  And how predictable that Peverly would blow a fuse.  Cudos to Canty - Keith out thought Calcott all ends up.  Calcott''s time is up IMO.

Cole now has been sent of twice against Canterbury in successive seasons. - was a liitle luckly not to received a straight red in the first half.

Legend
2.2K
·
16K
·
over 17 years
Blew.2 wrote:

On the day the better team wins. Does not make them the better team over a season . Manu lose to NCU - MV lose to NJ and on we go. CU did well last year and came close, but so did TW the year before. 

IMO ChCh united would have the same budget as TW but it's a big leap to ACFC. So all ASB teams do the best they can on the day. Waitak draw with HBU, ..the gap is closing  - double  hic. Still at Bar Stool Investment Convention  

I hope they call last orders soon
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years
Feverish wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

On the day the better team wins. Does not make them the better team over a season . Manu lose to NCU - MV lose to NJ and on we go. CU did well last year and came close, but so did TW the year before. 

IMO ChCh united would have the same budget as TW but it's a big leap to ACFC. So all ASB teams do the best they can on the day. Waitak draw with HBU, ..the gap is closing  - double  hic. Still at Bar Stool Investment Convention  

I hope they call last orders soon

Just got a roadie lol
Not Boyd
420
·
3.7K
·
over 16 years


Need a lethal striker to keep us in touch.

Phoenix Academy
12
·
170
·
over 11 years

Would have thought Joe Gaughan would have been worth a go, lethal finisher!

Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

So tee dubs game not on sky this weekend.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Fail. 

So really no point in scheduling those ages at the stadium then. 

Starting XI
120
·
2.7K
·
over 17 years
Blew.2 wrote:

Weekend review

Penalty dictated game 

Ooooh ...... so that's why Calcott gave player of the day to his assistant coach?
Phoenix Academy
10
·
230
·
about 14 years

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eLSF5ArAZHs

Link to the highlights.. Peno was weak and Claphams goal was more luck than skill.

Ugly for Tdubs though

Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years


Not sure about that penalty.

Starting XI
120
·
4.3K
·
over 15 years
2ndBest wrote:


Not sure about that penalty.


+ 1
And the one at the other end that resulted in a yellow card for diving !!!!
Appiah without the pace
6.8K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

Thought that looked like a dive.

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years

Westpac Stadium Gates Open 2.30 Saturday 14 December for TW v Wanders 2.45 kick off.

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
about 17 years
Blew.2 wrote:

Westpac Stadium Gates Open 2.30 Saturday 14 December for TW v Wanders 2.45 kick off.

 

What is the point of this?
Trialist
2
·
74
·
almost 11 years

I completely agree. What is the point?

I happily go to watch Team Wellington at Dave F in their own right. Sitting for 4 hours in the Westpac watching this game played to no-one and then the Phoenix doesn't appeal so much - particularly when you have wife to keep onside!

I can understand trying to get more people interested in Team Wellington but for me this isn't the way to do it. I like the current arrangement of season ticket holders getting into Team Wellington games for free and being closer and more involved in the action at Dave F.

Legend
2.2K
·
16K
·
over 17 years

1pm at davey f with the bar open would have been ideal

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
over 17 years

When there was TV coverage last season it made sense, but this season?

Odd.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
Jerzy Merino wrote:

Jason Pine @pineyzb

Team Wellington have signed English winger Charlie Henry previously of Chelmsford City, Macclesfield Town and Luton Town #asbpremiership

Wasn't Chelmsford City the UK club where those English guys implicated in the VFL betting scandal came from? Just wondering.

Nope, they came from a couple tiers below where Chelmsford play.

"Goalkeeper Joe Woolley, defenders Reiss Noel and David Obaze and midfielder Nick McKoy, who all recently played for teams in English non-leagues, each face eight charges - four counts of engaging in, and four counts of facilitating, conduct that corrupts a betting outcome.

Woolley, 23, and Noel, 24, were with AFC Hornchurch in the Isthmian League before moving to Southern Stars in July. 


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2426675/British-Southern-Stars-footballers-fear-ringleader-Australian-match-fixing-charge.html

"Earlier this year betting experts flagged up the fact that more than one million was staked on the game between Welling and Billericay Town, more than on a Champions League match involving Barcelona the same night, despite only 408 spectators attending the fixture. Two betting firms opted not to take bets on Conference matches involving Chelmsford, Billericay and AFC Hornchurch games." - UK Daily Telegraph last week.

Starting XI
1.5K
·
4.9K
·
about 16 years
reg22 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
reg22 wrote:
one place where i don't think the franchise thing has worked in napier, brand wise anyway.  the 'napier city rovers' brand is/was a massive one.  they ditched it so that they could be inclusive with other clubs who have put in varying degrees of effort over the years


It looks like it sort of works in Canty too.


YHM never had any sort of connection. WaiBOP and Southern look like they struggle with it too.



i've always thought it works well in canterbury

christchurch has historically been a one-team town

woolston were in the league for a while, but after one season i believe they turned into woolston canterbury and the next season canterbury

so they had been operating as a one-entry city for some time before the advent of the franchise league came along

i'm not sure at which point mainland football took over the running of the team

The franchise concept has worked better in Canterbury than the club model of the regional league champions having the right to enter the national league, which was disasterous in the 1990's.

Christchurch are really the pioneers of the merger/ franchise concept from the National League's inception in 1970. Christchurch United was actually formed as a new entity from the combined resources of several prominent local clubs (Christchurch City, Woolston, Rangers, Christchurch Technical and Shamrock) solely to contest the National League.

Thus, they had a lot of financial clout, connections and public support and were the only consistantly strong national league side in Christchurch 1970-1991. New Brighton competed in the league from 1972-1977. Other Christchurch clubs briefly competed in the league, Woolston and Rangers (by virtue of winning the Southern League) but never achieved much. United- New Brighton derbies in the 70's did attract the biggest crowds in National League history of 10.000 or so.

However, when the National league was discontinued in 1992, Christchurch United became just another local club.


When the National League was revived in 1996, 97, 98, as an invitational National Summer Soccer League, Woolston Working Men's Club were granted entry - a major disaster since it was just another small, not particularly distinguished local club.

Woolston failed spectacularly to attract the support of most football fans or players - fans and players remained loyal to their own clubs and Woolston had crowds of 200 - 400, always finishing last on the table. Many of the best Canterbury players indeed preferred to migrate north to play for Nelson Suburbs, seen as preferable to playing for a Woolston side many players from other local clubs felt to be a rival and less  competent organizationally than Nelson.

However, the franchise concept had already been launched at the Christchurch Casino (with financial backing from that institution and elsewhere) at the same time Woolston was applying to enter the new Summer League in 1996. The Canterbury franchise had the backing of most Christchurch clubs (well, all except Woolston) and top football people like Steve Woodin. Its application was rejected in favour of Woolston to howls of derision from most football folk in Christchurch.

I myself wrote to Bill McGowan advocating a franchise-based league or at least requesting he consider allowing a franchise entry for Canterbury. He however stuck to club-based criteria - until the wheels fell off the Summer League, clubs went bust and he made a turn around to accepting franchises were the way to go from 2004.

After Woolston realised they didn't have the resources on their own to field a competent side in the National League, they joined with the then most successful local club Christchurch Technical to form Christchurch City in the league for the 2000, 2001 seasons.


Canterbury United was in effect a franchise when it entered the still club-based national league, replacing Christchurch City after they voluntarily withdrew to allow them to take their place for the 2002 and 2003 seasons. Mainland Football now administered the national league entry. 

Such was the improvement in Canterbury's entrant in the national league in terms of results, crowds and financial performance, with all Canterbury clubs now supportive of the Canterbury United entry, that Bill McGowan changed his tune and opted for a franchise-based league from 2004 on - hence the advent of the NZ Football Championship. Nelson also came on board Canterbury United.

Even Waitakere City who had emerged as the dominant force in Auckland football in the early 1990's, becoming national champions in '90, '92, '95, '96 '97 were imploding by 2002 when they finished last and were relegated from the national league. Many clubs were struggling to stay afloat. Hence the shift to franchises, encouraging clubs to pool their resources to form stronger entities.

Auckland City's rise to prominence is only a post 2004 phenomenon. There was only one national league title for central Auckland in 18 years prior to 2004 !!!! The franchise league set-up has really benefited the central Auckland area - in the 18 years between Mount Wellington's last title win in 1986 and the NZFC's advent in 2004, the only club from the central Auckland area to win the national league was Central United in  2001 (they won the North Island League v South Island League play-off in 1999 when there was no national league - but that clearly doesn't count as winning the national league). Central United were never very successful in winning the national league - they had more success in the Chatham Cup.

WeeNix
280
·
630
·
almost 17 years

Hi Peter,

A typically thoughtful summary. I'll put on my anorak and numpty hat and argue a couple of points of detail, however.

Uni-Mt Wellington also won the national league in 2000. And we should also note that in two season East Auckland (2003) and Central (1997) only missed out on the title on goal difference. 

And there is no reason to discount the 1999 title, it was touted as the national club championship. 

Further, in the early 90s Waitakere City were based at Western Springs, which geographically made them as central Auckland as you can get.

So, anyone so inclined could equally argue that it is exceptionally rare for Auckland not to have had a club  in at least the top two nationally over the past 30 years - which would conspire against the proposition that club strength in central Auckland is a post-2004 phenomenon.

Not that I want to be aligning myself with Aucklanders, mind. (Apart, perhaps from Wombat, if he is reading this).

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

Fair point Bruce

Starting XI
1.5K
·
4.9K
·
about 16 years

Hi Peter,

A typically thoughtful summary. I'll put on my anorak and numpty hat and argue a couple of points of detail, however.

Uni-Mt Wellington also won the national league in 2000. And we should also note that in two season East Auckland (2003) and Central (1997) only missed out on the title on goal difference. 

And there is no reason to discount the 1999 title, it was touted as the national club championship. 

Further, in the early 90s Waitakere City were based at Western Springs, which geographically made them as central Auckland as you can get.

So, anyone so inclined could equally argue that it is exceptionally rare for Auckland not to have had a club  in at least the top two nationally over the past 30 years - which would conspire against the proposition that club strength in central Auckland is a post-2004 phenomenon.

Not that I want to be aligning myself with Aucklanders, mind. (Apart, perhaps from Wombat, if he is reading this).

Some good points Bruce - except I don't think Uni-Mt Wellington won the National league in 2000 - it was Napier City Rovers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_National_Soccer_League

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_City_Rovers

"Napier City Rovers have... won the old New Zealand National Soccer League in 1989, 1993, 1998, and 2000. They represented New Zealand at the Oceania Club Championship in 2001, finishing third."

Uni-Mount Wellington's last national league win was 1986 according to their own website: http://www.sportsground.co.nz/unimtafc/47785/

I still reject the 1999 "National Club Championship" as being a proper national league title - was just a one-off game between North island & South Island league winners. Quite different to the slog of contesting a whole season.

So I'm sticking with "only one national league title for a club that was clearly a central Auckland region club 1986 - 2004."

(Christchurch United won the league three times in that period - but  hummmffff...I'm reluctant to mention not since 1991...

Bruce, you'll have to make allowances for us grasping at reasons to denigrate Auckland football success down here...)


That's an interesting point about Waitakere City playing at Western Springs - but just how "central Auckland" were the club? Wasn't the club otherwise based in Waitakere in terms of administration, its other teams and support? Where did the spectators come from? My mother's family's club Charlton Athletic played its games at Crystal Palace's Selhurst Park in the late '80's - early '90's when the Valley was derelict but that didn't make it part of that geographical area of London (remained firmly SE London and Charlton suburb, rather than South London).

WeeNix
280
·
630
·
almost 17 years

Hi Peter,

My error on 2000... But only partially. Uni-Mt Wellington actually won the 'league' part of the national league, but were beaten on penalties in the cup final part of the league. 

(My traditional side still thinks of them as league champs.)

Half accept your point on 1999. But the North Island league was actually a bloody tough league... from memory every single team in there had played national league in the 90s except Western Suburbs... Central were very worthy winners. The South Island league was perhaps not quite so rigorous. 

As for Waitakere, well, the club  was formed specifically to compete in the national league. In theory it was to be comprised of 'contributing' or 'feeder' clubs such as Lynndale (now Lynn-Avon) and West Auckland and was based at Western Springs - which Westies will tell you is not really west at all. 

Early on (some would say even late on) Waitakere never had a true west Auckland fan base in spite of all the bumph... people here sometimes mistake Jeff Vader for a Waitak fan, :-) but they are rare beasts.  It's supporters - if that is not too strong a term - come from all over the place. 

The club (clubrooms at the end of the stadium block)  was originally based at Western Springs, and had a Ponsonby PO Box.

And the players? Well, they initially came from all over Auckland... Kim Hughes, Justin Worlsey (North Shore), Glen Adam (Mt Wellington) Thomas Edge (Gisborne), Michael Legg (Mt Roskill), Marcus Gerbich (Waikato), Neil Woodhams (University), Colin Hume (Manurewa), Graeme Cameron (West Auckland), Tony Laus (Takapuna & West Auckland)

But I would concede you are correct insofar as concerns the SPIRIT of Waitakere (and its Godfather, Rex Dawkins) which came via the Kelston club which had zoomed through the northern league in the early-mid 80s and was at least suitably westerly. And definitely the pokie money was west...

During 1991 Waitakere merged with (took over) Massey AFC and became a true West Auckland club. 



Starting XI
37
·
2.1K
·
over 17 years

Haven't really been following the ASBP since moving to Sydney, but a few of questions/observations:

- How many actual local Wellingtonian players (playing week in week out in CL) are in the TW squad and playing regularly?

- What's the point of signing so many out of towners and overseas players when they consistently fail to challenge for the title?

- Who is Matt Calcott accountable to? Does he have a criteria for success as Head Coach of TW? If it is just "to win the ASBP", I'm not too sure he has been quite successful in that regard...

Phoenix Academy
240
·
360
·
almost 11 years

Bruce/pete

I was involved at the inception of Waitakere City and while the original base was Western Springs and players were drawn from all over, it was most definitely a team designed to represent the West. Players like Jorgensen, R Gray, Woodhams, Laus, Wright, Hamlin and Legg were very much "westies", as was pretty much everyone behind the scenes. The Springs location was mainly because it was the only decent venue available, and the hard core of supporters (admittedly small) were very much from  further down SH16

I cant comment on the lack of passion recently but that's not just a Waitak issue. Anyhoo, not a drama - and perception is reality after all :)

WeeNix
280
·
630
·
almost 17 years

Tks Happy Days.

I'm no expert, but in 1990 Waitakere were a great team. While Chch won the post-season top 5 playoffs, at the time that was definitely a secondary prize to winning the league, where Waitak won. I recall the trips to Western Springs and some torrid battles. Waitakere were the emerging force in Auckland, and those of us from out of town certainly didn't demarcate between east, west or central.  Woodhams was a tremendous player, Darren McLennan ran like a scalded cat, and Thomas Edge was clinical. 

Suppose we shouldn't completely take over the Wellington thread though. 


Starting XI
1.5K
·
4.9K
·
about 16 years
DKP22 wrote:

Haven't really been following the ASBP since moving to Sydney, but a few of questions/observations:

- How many actual local Wellingtonian players (playing week in week out in CL) are in the TW squad and playing regularly?

- What's the point of signing so many out of towners and overseas players when they consistently fail to challenge for the title?

- Who is Matt Calcott accountable to? Does he have a criteria for success as Head Coach of TW? If it is just "to win the ASBP", I'm not too sure he has been quite successful in that regard...

They were pants against Canterbury last weekend in a game I saw in Christchurch. Comprehensively outplayed in all areas. Sluggish defence Canterbury had no problems going around, and although they had their share of possession going forward, did nothing effective with it. Barely bothered Adam Highfield in Canterbury's goal all day.
Aaron Clapham's solo run from behind halfway right through the Wellington side, sums it up (at 3 mins in this highlight clip):
Ten minutes of highlights (highlights of all Canterbury home games will be posted there):

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years

I was on program duty- did sky man the cameras during TW game?

Trialist
19
·
100
·
about 11 years
Big Pete 65 wrote:
DKP22 wrote:

Haven't really been following the ASBP since moving to Sydney, but a few of questions/observations:

- How many actual local Wellingtonian players (playing week in week out in CL) are in the TW squad and playing regularly?

- What's the point of signing so many out of towners and overseas players when they consistently fail to challenge for the title?

- Who is Matt Calcott accountable to? Does he have a criteria for success as Head Coach of TW? If it is just "to win the ASBP", I'm not too sure he has been quite successful in that regard...

They were pants against Canterbury last weekend in a game I saw in Christchurch. Comprehensively outplayed in all areas. Sluggish defence Canterbury had no problems going around, and although they had their share of possession going forward, did nothing effective with it. Barely bothered Adam Highfield in Canterbury's goal all day.

Aaron Clapham's solo run from behind halfway right through the Wellington side, sums it up (at 3 mins in this highlight clip):

Ten minutes of highlights (highlights of all Canterbury home games will be posted there):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLSF5ArAZHs



You have to wonder about Calcott, He has got Bertch who is with the Phoenix looking like he was close to signing contract and calcott doesnt even play him..... From what I saw pre season he was quite impressive and now seems to be bench or not at all.Heard hes been training, so obviously not injured.

Maybe time for change in Team not Wellington!

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years

[/quote]

You have to wonder about Calcott, He has got Bertch who is with the Phoenix looking like he was close to signing contract and calcott doesnt even play him..... From what I saw pre season he was quite impressive and now seems to be bench or not at all.Heard hes been training, so obviously not injured.

Maybe time for change in Team not Wellington!

[/quote]  Maybe he is not able to use him. Unless you are in direct contact with the playing group or the player concerned - we will never know.

Team Wellington... no longer an association with Ole. Chur

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up