South Africa 2010
You can't possibly be serious. Comparing us to any of those countires is laughable. You're also wrong - with the exception of Saudi Arabia (who have, however, poured millions of $$$ into football which we could only dream of), many of the players of the teams you've mentioned play in very strong clubs accross Europe and South America (by the way, have you ever heard of Nemanja Vidic? Apparently playing for a Belgrade team called Manchester United...And Dwight York played for the club with the same name in Trinidad and Tobago...Emmanual Adebayor - currently in a Togoan side called Arsenal). Even those who don't play for big-name clubs play in strong leagues, and have plenty of top-class experience that our lads are still some years away from getting. Whilst none of those countries you mentioned have a realistic chance of wining the World Cup, they are highly competetive at that level, and have shown that over the years (probably with the exception of Togo, who only emerged recently, but performed highly credibly).
I understand that being self-delusional is an essential part of being a fan, but surely there are some limits?
And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best
Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last 5 WC
Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)
Like I said, the specifics can be debated, but the principle
remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.
And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last�5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated,� but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.
And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last 5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated, but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.
I think the US (33rd by ELO) would beat Wales - and that was the trigger point for my referencing the various ranking systems.
And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last�5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated,� but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.
Of course they could. Remember they drew 1-1 (and could have won, too) with Italy in the World Cup last year. They may be not the 17th best team in the world, but they're a pretty handy side.el grapadura2007-09-18 20:40:09
And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last�5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated,� but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.
Of course they could. Remember they drew 1-1 (and could have won, too) with Italy in the World Cup last year. They may be not the 17th best team in the world, but they're a pretty handy side.
I'm sorry, but that is garbage.
Against a ten man Italy they failed to muster a meaningful shot in 45 minutes of football. It would have been a travesty if they had won that match.
You can't possibly be serious. Comparing us to any of those countires is laughable. You're also wrong - with the exception of Saudi Arabia (who have, however, poured millions of $$$ into football which we could only dream of), many of the players of the teams you've mentioned play in very strong clubs accross Europe and South America (by the way, have you ever heard of Nemanja Vidic? Apparently playing for a Belgrade team called Manchester United...And Dwight York played for the club with the same name in Trinidad and Tobago...Emmanual Adebayor - currently in a Togoan side called Arsenal). Even those who don't play for big-name clubs play in strong leagues, and have plenty of top-class experience that our lads are still some years away from getting. Whilst none of those countries you mentioned have a realistic chance of wining the World Cup, they are highly competetive at that level, and have shown that over the years (probably with the exception of Togo, who only emerged recently, but performed highly credibly).
I understand that being self-delusional is an essential part of being a fan, but surely there are some limits?
I'd have thought actually creating a goal-scoring chance was more of a pre-requisite. Personally I'm not 100% certain it wasn't a penalty either.
Well, even the likes of Italy and France will have players playing in unfancied clubs - no international team is full of players from Barcelona, Man U, Arsenal and AC Milan. The main point I was trying to make is that we're not really comparable to any of those teams both in terms of our playing talent and international experience. By the way, Phalio didn't mention Angola (and they had a player, Pedro Mantorras, who used to play for Benfica but not sure if he's still there), but they probably are closest to us in terms of where their players are playing. They're leaps and bounds ahead of us in terms of international experience though.el grapadura2007-09-20 17:27:38
Who you're going to support if neither Greece or NZ make it?
You can't possibly be serious. Comparing us to any of those countires is laughable. You're also wrong - with the exception of Saudi Arabia (who have, however, poured millions of $$$ into football which we could only dream of), many of the players of the teams you've mentioned play in very strong clubs accross Europe and South America (by the way, have you ever heard of Nemanja Vidic? Apparently playing for a Belgrade team called Manchester United...And Dwight York played for the club with the same name in Trinidad and Tobago...Emmanual Adebayor - currently in a Togoan side called Arsenal). Even those who don't play for big-name clubs play in strong leagues, and have plenty of top-class experience that our lads are still some years away from getting. Whilst none of those countries you mentioned have a realistic chance of wining the World Cup, they are highly competetive at that level, and have shown that over the years (probably with the exception of Togo, who only emerged recently, but performed highly credibly).
I understand that being self-delusional is an essential part of being a fan, but surely there are some limits?
Ok so I don't know about Angola. But lumping Serbia with some of those other countries just shows ignorance. Have a look at the clubs that members of the Serbian national team plays for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbia_football. The likes of Dejan Stankovic, Vidic, and potentially Zigic are all genuine world class players who would probably make the XI's of just about any country in the world.
Now lets have a look at Togo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Togo_national_football_team there's a good number of players in that list who are playing in clubs at the highest level of european football. Not as impressive as Serbia, but a damn sight better than the All Whites.
The Trinidad and Tobago model is perhaps the best example of what the all whites can achieve. They had a Talisman (Dwight York, read Ryan Nelsen), but the rest of there players were mostly from the local leagues. The big advantage they have though is that they get to play regular football against decent teams (Mexico, USA and Costa Rica + a number of other sides who would be at least as strong as the island nations).
I don't know about getting past the 5th asian side this time around, they all look pretty strong, and in the long term I think NZ needs to follow after AU and move into the Asian qualifying process if we are to get regular matches of decent quality and actually improve to the point that we deserve to be at another WC.
Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Can't remember to be honest, but Seatts indicated that even Australia was finding it pretty expensive to compete in Asia. The additional problem that Seatts highlighted was FIFA - he said they'd be unlikely to let us leave Oceania now that Australia has left, as it would render the OFC completely irrelevant. I think Seatter realises that staying in Oceania in this form is not a great thing for NZ football, but given the current circumstances we'll have to make the best of it and wait for a more opportune time to jump ship to Asia.
Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Can't remember to be honest, but Seatts indicated that even Australia was finding it pretty expensive to compete in Asia. The additional problem that Seatts highlighted was FIFA - he said they'd be unlikely to let us leave Oceania now that Australia has left, as it would render the OFC completely irrelevant. I think Seatter realises that staying in Oceania in this form is not a great thing for NZ football, but given the current circumstances we'll have to make the best of it and wait for a more opportune time to jump ship to Asia.
Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Can't remember to be honest, but Seatts indicated that even Australia was finding it pretty expensive to compete in Asia. The additional problem that Seatts highlighted was FIFA - he said they'd be unlikely to let us leave Oceania now that Australia has left, as it would render the OFC completely irrelevant. I think Seatter realises that staying in Oceania in this form is not a great thing for NZ football, but given the current circumstances we'll have to make the best of it and wait for a more opportune time to jump ship to Asia.
The problem is that the Pacific nations at this stage aren't financially viable to compete in such a massive confederation, which, geographically a least, is the biggest in the world atm. You couldn't really expect Vanuatu or Solomon Islands to visit Lebanon, Uzbekistan and North Korea on regular basis. They'd probably blow their entire budget on just one of those trips. I know that FIFA is looking to pump money into those Pacific nations and into their player development, but merging Oceania and Asia is not viable at the moment. But I wouldn't be surprised if FIFA is trying to create conditions for that to happen in the long-term, because Oceania as it stands now is pretty much a joke.
Maybe a dilemma for NZS assuming you get to play fifth best Asian team, where do you play the home leg.
Auckland, pros larger ground, move money because of larger ground, match normally gets a lots of coverage for the home city across Asia maybe (don�t yell at me) Auckland looks better remember I said maybe.
Ring of fire, pros would have knowledgeable spectators at match, assume Nix players make up 70% of the team it is a home match and every blade of grass every wind change is understood by coach and players. Cons Auckland pros I guess, money and (stop yelling) NZ image. This is not to say that Windy Wellie does not have a certain charm and great character about it.
So to comes down to money V best chance of winning, a big dilemma and I am glad I don�t have to make the choice. Alternative Whangarei is holds plenty.