Starting XI
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
almost 17 years
disco_mart wrote:
Ryan Nelsen is not our only world class player. What about Killen, Elliot, Vicelic (when not injured), and I think Brown and James could play at a high level one day.
Hmm, a guy lucky to be on the bench for Celtic, a guy playing in the team at the bottom of the Dutch league, and a guy with a handful of first team appearances for a pretty average Premiership team. World class? I think not. If they weren't New Zealanders, they'd be nowhere near international football. I'll reserve judgment on Brown and James since I hope they'll reach the required level, but the first three I don't see improving, especially the older ones in Elliot and Vicelich.

 

I agree with most of what your saying but I believe that Ivan gets to the UK and gets back on his true form I see no reason why he can't lay week in week out for one of the better premiership sides, and as for Brown he's going to have to work hard as time is running out for him... seriously... no one from Aussie or NZ who has played in the A League plays in the EPL (at least as far as I know).
Dwight Yorke plays for Sunderland.
 
Yeah but you missed the point, he ain't Aussie or Kiwi
disco_mart2007-09-17 22:41:30
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
disco_mart wrote:
disco_mart wrote:
Ryan Nelsen is not our only world class player. What about Killen, Elliot, Vicelic (when not injured), and I think Brown and James could play at a high level one day.
Hmm, a guy lucky to be on the bench for Celtic, a guy playing in the team at the bottom of the Dutch league, and a guy with a handful of first team appearances for a pretty average Premiership team. World class? I think not. If they weren't New Zealanders, they'd be nowhere near international football. I'll reserve judgment on Brown and James since I hope they'll reach the required level, but the first three I don't see improving, especially the older ones in Elliot and Vicelich.

�

I agree with most of what your saying but I believe that Ivan gets to the UK and gets back on his true form I see no reason why he can't lay week in week out for one of the better premiership sides, and as for Brown he's going to have to work hard as time is running out for him... seriously... no one from Aussie or NZ who has played in the A League plays in the EPL (at least as far as I know).
Dwight Yorke plays for Sunderland.

�

Yeah but you missed the point, he ain't Aussie or Kiwi
Adrian Leijer is an Australian
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
almost 17 years
As people are using the performance against Wales as a yard-stick for judging whether the All Whites can beat the 5th best Asian team, the following is relevant:
 
- Wales are currently ranked  #74 by FIFA
- Japan* are ranked #41
- Iran* are ranked #44
- Australia* are ranked #49
- South Korea* are ranked #50
- Saudi Arabia*  are ranked #51
- Uzbekistan are ranked #58
- Iraq are ranked #64
- Oman are ranked #76
*Team is given a bye direct to the Asian Qualifiers Third Round.
 
On paper then we need to face the 8th best Asian team to consider opposition on a par with Wales.
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
almost 17 years
Blimey, I just realised I called the All Whites "we".... you can blame the Phoenix for that Freudian slip from an Englishman!
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
SiNZ wrote:
As people are using the performance against Wales as a yard-stick for judging whether the All Whites can beat the 5th best Asian team, the following is relevant:
�

- Wales are currently ranked� #74 by FIFA

- Japan* are ranked #41

- Iran* are ranked #44

- Australia* are ranked #49

- South Korea* are ranked #50

- Saudi Arabia*� are ranked #51

- Uzbekistan are ranked #58

- Iraq are ranked #64

- Oman are ranked #76

*Team is given a bye direct to the Asian Qualifiers Third Round.

�

On paper then we need to face the 8th best Asian team to consider opposition on a par with Wales.
Lol if you actually believe the Fifa rankings you have a problem. The FIFA rankings are very inaccurate, you can just tell by looking at the top 20. Its hard to use the rankings to compare teams. I can see what you are trying to say however.wellyphoenixfan2007-09-18 19:37:03
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
almost 17 years
Sure, the FIFA rankings have their problems - though since they updated the formula last year many of the criticisms have been improved against.
 
The ELO system, much lauded by critics of the FIFA system show:
- Wales 56th
- Iran 20th=
- Japan 31st
- Australia 38th
- Saudi Arabia 40th
- Iraq 45th
- South Korea 47th
- Uzbekistan 60th
 
Whilst the specifics can be debated, I think the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Phalio wrote:
This argument is being polarized way too much. Just because the all whites squad is not made of 11 players who start on the likes of man u, ac, barcelona, etc. does NOT mean the squad is doomed to never have any international success. Some of you are talking like the only teams that ever play in world cups are contenders, while realistically only 1/3 actually are. For example- can you picture a Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Togo, Saudi Arabia, Switerland, Ecuador, or Serbia making a serious challenge for the world cup? NO! But all those teams managed to qualify last time, despite the fact that they have few international superstars and are mostly made up of domestically based players with few credentials.
�

Can NZ make it to South Africa? Well, the quality of players are better than in years past, and the road is possibly the easiest it's ever been. I'd say they have a pretty decent shot of it. 50/50.


You can't possibly be serious. Comparing us to any of those countires is laughable. You're also wrong - with the exception of Saudi Arabia (who have, however, poured millions of $$$ into football which we could only dream of), many of the players of the teams you've mentioned play in very strong clubs accross Europe and South America (by the way, have you ever heard of Nemanja Vidic? Apparently playing for a Belgrade team called Manchester United...And Dwight York played for the club with the same name in Trinidad and Tobago...Emmanual Adebayor - currently in a Togoan side called Arsenal). Even those who don't play for big-name clubs play in strong leagues, and have plenty of top-class experience that our lads are still some years away from getting. Whilst none of those countries you mentioned have a realistic chance of wining the World Cup, they are highly competetive at that level, and have shown that over the years (probably with the exception of Togo, who only emerged recently, but performed highly credibly).
I understand that being self-delusional is an essential part of being a fan, but surely there are some limits?
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
For an example; USA are ranked 17th in the world. This is just pathetic most of those Asain teams could beat them yet the US is still ranked that high.
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
almost 17 years

And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last 5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)

Like I said, the specifics can be debated,  but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.

Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
SiNZ wrote:

And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last�5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated,� but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.

So you think the US could beat Australia or South Korea?
Starting XI
2
·
3.1K
·
about 17 years
SiNZ wrote:

And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last 5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated,  but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.

So you think the US could beat Australia or South Korea?
 
17th might be a touch high - but they are still a handy side
 
I would definitely back them to beat the 5th asian side, or Wales for that matter
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
almost 17 years

I think the US (33rd by ELO) would beat Wales - and that was the trigger point for my referencing the various ranking systems.

As regards, the other two - against South Korea, probably; against Australia, probably not.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
SiNZ wrote:

And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last�5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated,� but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.

So you think the US could beat Australia or South Korea?


Of course they could. Remember they drew 1-1 (and could have won, too) with Italy in the World Cup last year. They may be not the 17th best team in the world, but they're a pretty handy side.el grapadura2007-09-18 20:40:09
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
SiNZ wrote:

And yet the US qualify ahead of the team that beat the 5th best Asian team in 2006. (The US have qualified for the last�5 WC Finals progressing past the group phase a couple of times.)Like I said, the specifics can be debated,� but the principle remains - Wales are not likely to beat the 5th best Asian team.

So you think the US could beat Australia or South Korea?


Of course they could. Remember they drew 1-1 (and could have won, too) with Italy in the World Cup last year. They may be not the 17th best team in the world, but they're a pretty handy side.
Australia deserved to beat Italy.
Trialist
0
·
74
·
almost 17 years
Australia deserved to beat Italy.


I'm sorry, but that is garbage.

Against a ten man Italy they failed to muster a meaningful shot in 45 minutes of football.  It would have been a travesty if they had won that match.
Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years
Phalio wrote:
This argument is being polarized way too much. Just because the all whites squad is not made of 11 players who start on the likes of man u, ac, barcelona, etc. does NOT mean the squad is doomed to never have any international success. Some of you are talking like the only teams that ever play in world cups are contenders, while realistically only 1/3 actually are. For example- can you picture a Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Togo, Saudi Arabia, Switerland, Ecuador, or Serbia making a serious challenge for the world cup? NO! But all those teams managed to qualify last time, despite the fact that they have few international superstars and are mostly made up of domestically based players with few credentials.
 

Can NZ make it to South Africa? Well, the quality of players are better than in years past, and the road is possibly the easiest it's ever been. I'd say they have a pretty decent shot of it. 50/50.


You can't possibly be serious. Comparing us to any of those countires is laughable. You're also wrong - with the exception of Saudi Arabia (who have, however, poured millions of $$$ into football which we could only dream of), many of the players of the teams you've mentioned play in very strong clubs accross Europe and South America (by the way, have you ever heard of Nemanja Vidic? Apparently playing for a Belgrade team called Manchester United...And Dwight York played for the club with the same name in Trinidad and Tobago...Emmanual Adebayor - currently in a Togoan side called Arsenal). Even those who don't play for big-name clubs play in strong leagues, and have plenty of top-class experience that our lads are still some years away from getting. Whilst none of those countries you mentioned have a realistic chance of wining the World Cup, they are highly competetive at that level, and have shown that over the years (probably with the exception of Togo, who only emerged recently, but performed highly credibly).
I understand that being self-delusional is an essential part of being a fan, but surely there are some limits?
 
Well hold on, you're pulling out their best players and naming big clubs.  Go and find the 11, 12, 13 18th player in those squads and I guarantee you that they won't be anywhere decent.  Angola for example, their most famous player Akra plays in the Gulf and the rest played in their local league.  That's not to say we will or will not qualify, or that we are better teams than these sides.  But we can compete if we get the right side on the park and leverage off our best players as these teams do.
 
However, we can't underestimate the Asian sides, and especially the conditions in Asia.  Aussie did it and look at the mess they made of the Asian Cup.
Starting XI
0
·
4.6K
·
over 16 years
I don't know if Aus actually underestimated their opposition but they were tactically poor, ditching the possession-style football of Hiddink that had been so successful for them. There's a lesson for NZ: keep the ball, especially in 35 degrees of Asian or Middle East heat.
 
Having watched a fair chunk of the Asian Cup I think NZ will have their hands full coping with the 5th place Asian team, whoever it is. Remember, Asian Cup winners Iraq are only 12th in current FIFA seedings! The 5th team will be battle-hardened from an arduous qualifying campaign against quality opponents. Can we say the same?
 
Mind you, we've got a much better chance than if we were up against the likes of Uruguay or Columbia....
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
Kingzfan wrote:
Australia deserved to beat Italy.
I'm sorry, but that is garbage.Against a ten man Italy they failed to muster a meaningful shot in 45 minutes of football.� It would have been a travesty if they had won that match.
All of the Italians play regular top league matches while about 8-9 players in Australia play at this level yet they held them out till a penalty that shouldn't have been given was given. wellyphoenixfan2007-09-20 16:26:03
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
That doesn't mean they deserved the win does it ?

I'd have thought actually creating a goal-scoring chance was more of a pre-requisite.  Personally I'm not 100% certain it wasn't a penalty either.
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
Hard News wrote:
That doesn't mean they deserved the win does it ?I'd have thought actually creating a goal-scoring chance was more of a pre-requisite.� Personally I'm not 100% certain it wasn't a penalty either.
They didn't deserve to lose.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
james dean wrote:
Phalio wrote:
This argument is being polarized way too much. Just because the all whites squad is not made of 11 players who start on the likes of man u, ac, barcelona, etc. does NOT mean the squad is doomed to never have any international success. Some of you are talking like the only teams that ever play in world cups are contenders, while realistically only 1/3 actually are. For example- can you picture a Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Togo, Saudi Arabia, Switerland, Ecuador, or Serbia making a serious challenge for the world cup? NO! But all those teams managed to qualify last time, despite the fact that they have few international superstars and are mostly made up of domestically based players with few credentials.
�

Can NZ make it to South Africa? Well, the quality of players are better than in years past, and the road is possibly the easiest it's ever been. I'd say they have a pretty decent shot of it. 50/50.
You can't possibly be serious. Comparing us to any of those countires is laughable. You're also wrong - with the exception of Saudi Arabia (who have, however, poured millions of $$$ into football which we could only dream of), many of the players of the teams you've mentioned play in very strong clubs accross Europe and South America (by the way, have you ever heard of Nemanja Vidic? Apparently playing for a Belgrade team called Manchester United...And Dwight York played for the club with the same name in Trinidad and Tobago...Emmanual Adebayor - currently in a Togoan side called Arsenal). Even those who don't play for big-name clubs play in strong leagues, and have plenty of top-class experience that our lads are still some years away from getting. Whilst none of those countries you mentioned have a realistic chance of wining the World Cup, they are highly competetive at that level, and have shown that over the years (probably with the exception of Togo, who only emerged recently, but performed highly credibly). I understand that being self-delusional is an essential part of being a fan, but surely there are some limits?

�

Well hold on, you're pulling out their best players and naming big clubs.� Go and find the 11, 12, 13 18th player in those squads and I guarantee you that they won't be anywhere decent.� Angola for example, their most famous player Akra plays in the Gulf and the rest played in their local league.� That's not to say we will or will not qualify, or that we are better teams than these sides.� But we can compete if we get the right side on the park and leverage off our best players as these teams do.

�

However, we can't underestimate the Asian sides, and especially the conditions in Asia.� Aussie did it and look at the mess they made of the Asian Cup.


Well, even the likes of Italy and France will have players playing in unfancied clubs - no international team is full of players from Barcelona, Man U, Arsenal and AC Milan. The main point I was trying to make is that we're not really comparable to any of those teams both in terms of our playing talent and international experience. By the way, Phalio didn't mention Angola (and they had a player, Pedro Mantorras, who used to play for Benfica but not sure if he's still there), but they probably are closest to us in terms of where their players are playing. They're leaps and bounds ahead of us in terms of international experience though.el grapadura2007-09-20 17:27:38
WeeNix
0
·
770
·
about 17 years
Neone going to this World Cup? I thnk i am since ma grndparents live in CapeTown free accomodation. Cant wait. Best place in world mate trust me.
Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
pavlos8 wrote:
Neone going to this World Cup? I thnk i am since ma grndparents live in CapeTown free accomodation. Cant wait. Best place in world mate trust me.


Who you're going to support if neither Greece or NZ make it?
First Team Squad
0
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years
pavlos8 wrote:
CapeTown - Best place in world mate trust me.
 
Cause you have been lots of places...
Phoenix Academy
0
·
360
·
almost 17 years
james dean wrote:
Phalio wrote:
This argument is being polarized way too much. Just because the all whites squad is not made of 11 players who start on the likes of man u, ac, barcelona, etc. does NOT mean the squad is doomed to never have any international success. Some of you are talking like the only teams that ever play in world cups are contenders, while realistically only 1/3 actually are. For example- can you picture a Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Togo, Saudi Arabia, Switerland, Ecuador, or Serbia making a serious challenge for the world cup? NO! But all those teams managed to qualify last time, despite the fact that they have few international superstars and are mostly made up of domestically based players with few credentials.
 

Can NZ make it to South Africa? Well, the quality of players are better than in years past, and the road is possibly the easiest it's ever been. I'd say they have a pretty decent shot of it. 50/50.


You can't possibly be serious. Comparing us to any of those countires is laughable. You're also wrong - with the exception of Saudi Arabia (who have, however, poured millions of $$$ into football which we could only dream of), many of the players of the teams you've mentioned play in very strong clubs accross Europe and South America (by the way, have you ever heard of Nemanja Vidic? Apparently playing for a Belgrade team called Manchester United...And Dwight York played for the club with the same name in Trinidad and Tobago...Emmanual Adebayor - currently in a Togoan side called Arsenal). Even those who don't play for big-name clubs play in strong leagues, and have plenty of top-class experience that our lads are still some years away from getting. Whilst none of those countries you mentioned have a realistic chance of wining the World Cup, they are highly competetive at that level, and have shown that over the years (probably with the exception of Togo, who only emerged recently, but performed highly credibly).
I understand that being self-delusional is an essential part of being a fan, but surely there are some limits?
 
Well hold on, you're pulling out their best players and naming big clubs.  Go and find the 11, 12, 13 18th player in those squads and I guarantee you that they won't be anywhere decent.  Angola for example, their most famous player Akra plays in the Gulf and the rest played in their local league.  That's not to say we will or will not qualify, or that we are better teams than these sides.  But we can compete if we get the right side on the park and leverage off our best players as these teams do.
 
However, we can't underestimate the Asian sides, and especially the conditions in Asia.  Aussie did it and look at the mess they made of the Asian Cup.


Ok so I don't know about Angola. But lumping Serbia with some of those other countries just shows ignorance. Have a look at the clubs that members of the Serbian national team plays for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbia_football. The likes of Dejan Stankovic, Vidic, and potentially Zigic are all genuine world class players who would probably make the XI's of just about any country in the world.

Now lets have a look at Togo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Togo_national_football_team there's a good number of players in that list who are playing in clubs at the highest level of european football. Not as impressive as Serbia, but a damn sight better than the All Whites.

The Trinidad and Tobago model is perhaps the best example of what the all whites can achieve. They had a Talisman (Dwight York, read Ryan Nelsen), but the rest of there players were mostly from the local leagues. The big advantage they have though is that they get to play regular football against decent teams (Mexico, USA and Costa Rica + a number of other sides who would be at least as strong as the island nations).

I don't know about getting past the 5th asian side this time around, they all look pretty strong, and in the long term I think NZ needs to follow after AU and move into the Asian qualifying process if we are to get regular matches of decent quality and actually improve to the point that we deserve to be at another WC.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
160
·
over 16 years
I agree, the more games you get against decent sides the more you learn (win or lose). Leveraging off the Phoenix gives us a better base in the A-League and hopefully you will see more kiwis getting picked up in some of the other strong teams in the league... The fact we don't have all the kiwis in our team is a good thing too, there's only a fixed number of spots and you want everyone getting worthwhile gametime to show their skills. 
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
Playing in Asia would get us more regular games, it would also improve our skill level aswell.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Playing in Asia would get us more regular games, it would also improve our skill level aswell.


Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Starting XI
0
·
4.6K
·
over 16 years
Playing in Asia would get us more regular games, it would also improve our skill level aswell.
 
But I can't see FIFA allowing us into Asia any time soon, if at all. Even so, we need to hassle FIFA at every opportunity about this because if we don't get out of the Oceania backwaters the All Whites will never truly be able to compete at international level.
With respect to the likes of Vanuatu I just can't get excited about the prospect of us playing Oceania teams. We're in a lose-lose situation: if we beat them we gain almost nothing in the way of big match experience, if we lose we are a laughing stock.
 
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
Playing in Asia would get us more regular games, it would also improve our skill level aswell.


Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Was this before or after we got sponsorship from Thai Airways. I would think Thai Airways would pay us more if we played in Asia as this is their prime business sector and we get free air travel so it would be alot better.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Playing in Asia would get us more regular games, it would also improve our skill level aswell.


Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Was this before or after we got sponsorship from Thai Airways. I would think Thai Airways would pay us more if we played in Asia as this is their prime business sector and we get free air travel so it would be alot better.


Can't remember to be honest, but Seatts indicated that even Australia was finding it pretty expensive to compete in Asia. The additional problem that Seatts highlighted was FIFA - he said they'd be unlikely to let us leave Oceania now that Australia has left, as it would render the OFC completely irrelevant. I think Seatter realises that staying in Oceania in this form is not a great thing for NZ football, but given the current circumstances we'll have to make the best of it and wait for a more opportune time to jump ship to Asia.
Starting XI
0
·
2.4K
·
over 16 years
Playing in Asia would get us more regular games, it would also improve our skill level aswell.


Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Was this before or after we got sponsorship from Thai Airways. I would think Thai Airways would pay us more if we played in Asia as this is their prime business sector and we get free air travel so it would be alot better.


Can't remember to be honest, but Seatts indicated that even Australia was finding it pretty expensive to compete in Asia. The additional problem that Seatts highlighted was FIFA - he said they'd be unlikely to let us leave Oceania now that Australia has left, as it would render the OFC completely irrelevant. I think Seatter realises that staying in Oceania in this form is not a great thing for NZ football, but given the current circumstances we'll have to make the best of it and wait for a more opportune time to jump ship to Asia.
They should merge Oceania and Asia into one this would easily solve the problem.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Playing in Asia would get us more regular games, it would also improve our skill level aswell.


Completely agree, but as Graham Seater has previously explained, joining the AFC would be very difficult for us for financial and logistical reasons. So it looks like we'll be stuck in Oceania for the next wee while.
Was this before or after we got sponsorship from Thai Airways. I would think Thai Airways would pay us more if we played in Asia as this is their prime business sector and we get free air travel so it would be alot better.


Can't remember to be honest, but Seatts indicated that even Australia was finding it pretty expensive to compete in Asia. The additional problem that Seatts highlighted was FIFA - he said they'd be unlikely to let us leave Oceania now that Australia has left, as it would render the OFC completely irrelevant. I think Seatter realises that staying in Oceania in this form is not a great thing for NZ football, but given the current circumstances we'll have to make the best of it and wait for a more opportune time to jump ship to Asia.
They should merge Oceania and Asia into one this would easily solve the problem.


The problem is that the Pacific nations at this stage aren't financially viable to compete in such a massive confederation, which, geographically a least, is the biggest in the world atm. You couldn't really expect Vanuatu or Solomon Islands to visit Lebanon, Uzbekistan and North Korea on regular basis. They'd probably blow their entire budget on just one of those trips. I know that FIFA is looking to pump money into those Pacific nations and into their player development, but merging Oceania and Asia is not viable at the moment. But I wouldn't be surprised if FIFA is trying to create conditions for that to happen in the long-term, because Oceania as it stands now is pretty much a joke.
Trialist
0
·
50
·
over 16 years
if we play well we will make it,we have to play smart as well,have to be aggressive and have clinical striking
Phoenix Academy
0
·
300
·
over 16 years
There will be alot of factors to consider for NZ to qlf for 2010.
Where will they play the 1st leg ? In NZ or away? should the 2nd leg be played in NZ.
Will Ricky have NZ ready for a presser cooker type of game/s.
 
Also has anyone seen what Aus went through when they went to Sth America both times and did u see the Away game in 1997 Iran -they came back with a draw but OMG hostel waters!.
 
I feel "at this point of time" NZ has no chance of getting to 2010 world cup. Not with its current team and lack of international game time.
Yet I belive after the Olympics 2008 we will see a more stronger/experience NZ team/line-up that would have a chance of making the 2010 WC finals. (Am i sounding 2faced?)
 
NZ cant rely on its O/Seas based players to make a decent starting XI, thats where the Phoenix FC will come into play and give home grown talent a step up in qty football - I'm not saying thats all the Phoenix is good for,Its just a fact that the Wellington Phoenix plays in the A-League and gives the locals players something to benefit from.
 
 
 
 
convict2007-10-25 08:32:50
Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
over 16 years

Maybe a dilemma for NZS assuming you get to play fifth best Asian team, where do you play the home leg.

Auckland, pros larger ground, move money because of larger ground, match normally gets a lots of coverage for the home city across Asia maybe (don�t yell at me) Auckland looks better remember I said maybe.

Ring of fire, pros would have knowledgeable spectators at match, assume Nix players make up 70% of the team it is a home match and every blade of grass every wind change is understood by coach and players. Cons Auckland pros I guess, money and (stop yelling) NZ image. This is not to say that Windy Wellie does not have a certain charm and great character about it.

So to comes down to money V best chance of winning, a big dilemma and I am glad I don�t have to make the choice. Alternative Whangarei is holds plenty.

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
It would be a big punt to assume Auckland would get a big crowd... WC/Confed Cup qualifiers against Aus in the last 7 years, Wellington got about double what Auckland got.
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
I'm suprised 50% of people said yes TBH. I think we have about a 10% chance of just sneaking in. I don't think we'll get there at all.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up