WeeNix
170
·
550
·
over 11 years

just scored an og in the league cup against Sheffield - oh well probably worth losing so they can concentrate on premier league survival

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years

Is there a League Plate competition for Man Utd, West Ham and co to play in now?!!

Starting XI
290
·
4.7K
·
over 17 years

Played full 90 for Hammers in a 2 all draw against Hull, good game.

Got  a needless yellow right at the end, otherwise was sound

Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
over 17 years

hepatitis wrote:

Played full 90 for Hammers in a 2 all draw against Hull, good game.

Got  a needless yellow right at the end, otherwise was sound

wasn't needless at all - Hull were breaking and he made the right call to break it up with a cynical foul.  Completely the right thing to do.

Starting XI
290
·
4.7K
·
over 17 years

Seemed to me that there were plenty of players covering, and it was near the half way line iirc

Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
over 17 years

the guy with the ball was not going to run 50 yards and score, but Hull were breaking, and we were looking a bit desperate.  When he did it, I nodded my head sagely and muttered to myself "well played young man".

Starting XI
290
·
4.7K
·
over 17 years
Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Is there a League Plate competition for Man Utd, West Ham and co to play in now?!!

Doesn't the League Cup do that job? Unfortunately MU, WH and co. have cocked that one up too.

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years

That's what I meant... they're knocked out of the cup so is there a plate comp!

HZA
Marquee
630
·
5.9K
·
about 15 years

good goal this morning, timely nod in, well done Winston

Marquee
620
·
6.3K
·
about 17 years

another mistimed header...

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years

Good reactions Winston to get your head on it. Then a yellow card...., then win the ball to set off the second goal. Great contribution for your hundredth Hammers game.

Legend
2.7K
·
17K
·
over 17 years

Getting lots of praise on from Hammers fans on the F365 forums.

First Team Squad
320
·
1.4K
·
almost 17 years
Phoenix Academy
25
·
160
·
over 17 years
Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Rumney72R wrote:

Apparent interest from United. Not overly sure about the source though...

http://www.thesportbible.com/articles/man-utd-to-make-shock-move-for-premier-league-defender

Van Gaal will probably say this about every 2nd CB Man U face up until the Jan window.

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Rumney72R wrote:

Apparent interest from United. Not overly sure about the source though...

http://www.thesportbible.com/articles/man-utd-to-make-shock-move-for-premier-league-defender

Van Gaal will probably say this about every 2nd CB Man U face up until the Jan window.

I doubt LVG would want him.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

Might be an unpopular opinion but I think he'd fit in there quite well. They need a bit of leadership from the back in that team. Depends what else is out there and available to them I suppose. They've already spent a fair bit of money, so Reid could represent good value for them. 

Or maybe I should just bow to Leggy's one liner wisdom. 

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Might be an unpopular opinion but I think he'd fit in there quite well. They need a bit of leadership from the back in that team. Depends what else is out there and available to them I suppose. They've already spent a fair bit of money, so Reid could represent good value for them. 

Or maybe I should just bow to Leggy's one liner wisdom. 

Or maybe you should watch how RVP did him like a dinner on the weekend.

Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
over 17 years

you have seen how the man utd backline have played this season right?

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

you have seen how the man utd backline have played this season right?

I'm not saying that he might not do a job, just that I doubt that he is LVG's type of player. Has been booked 3 times already this season.

There have been  rumours that Arsenal want him. He is strong in parts of his game but very weak in others. Passing is what lets him down.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
over 17 years

Tegal wrote:

Might be an unpopular opinion but I think he'd fit in there quite well. They need a bit of leadership from the back in that team. Depends what else is out there and available to them I suppose. They've already spent a fair bit of money, so Reid could represent good value for them. 

Or maybe I should just bow to Leggy's one liner wisdom. 

I reckon not.

Firstly, Man U's defence is not that bad. We have conceded 9 goals in 6 games this season but 5 of those goals came in one single game. That isn't so bad when we are playing 3-5-2 and have a lot of injuries. Plus Blind is decent but hardly a brilliant DM and he has only been there for the last few games. 

Jones, Evans, Rojo, Smalling, Blackett is enough in the centre of defence. I really don't think you can argue Reid is better than any of those guys (except Blackett but he has done well this season). Of course, I would have wanted Reid ahead of McNair on the weekend but McNair played and did well. We are out of the League Cup and have no European football this year so depth isn't really an issue. There is no point us signing another centre back unless they are a player of real quality. 

If Reid is going to go to a big club it would be Arsenal. Arsenal have quality first choice defenders but bad depth. Therefore Reid would help to cover that depth. I think people are deluding themselves if they thought Reid would be anything more than a squad player at a big club.

Marquee
7.8K
·
9.7K
·
almost 14 years

Ryan54 wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Might be an unpopular opinion but I think he'd fit in there quite well. They need a bit of leadership from the back in that team. Depends what else is out there and available to them I suppose. They've already spent a fair bit of money, so Reid could represent good value for them. 

Or maybe I should just bow to Leggy's one liner wisdom. 

I reckon not.

Firstly, Man U's defence is not that bad. We have conceded 9 goals in 6 games this season but 5 of those goals came in one single game. That isn't so bad when we are playing 3-5-2 and have a lot of injuries. Plus Blind is decent but hardly a brilliant DM and he has only been there for the last few games. 

Jones, Evans, Rojo, Smalling, Blackett is enough in the centre of defence. I really don't think you can argue Reid is better than any of those guys (except Blackett but he has done well this season). Of course, I would have wanted Reid ahead of McNair on the weekend but McNair played and did well. We are out of the League Cup and have no European football this year so depth isn't really an issue. There is no point us signing another centre back unless they are a player of real quality. 

If Reid is going to go to a big club it would be Arsenal. Arsenal have quality first choice defenders but bad depth. Therefore Reid would help to cover that depth. I think people are deluding themselves if they thought Reid would be anything more than a squad player at a big club.

Surely West Ham is the best place for him?

WeeNix
40
·
600
·
about 14 years

At the start of his contract at West Ham no one thought he would make it there. Now he is indispensable, would suggest he is potentially capable of stepping up to a big team.

WeeNix
40
·
600
·
about 14 years
valeo
·
Legend
4.7K
·
18K
·
over 17 years

Don't think his passing is good enough.

Legend
7.8K
·
15K
·
about 17 years

think it's passable

Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Reid NZ's second highest paid sportsman, although I can't see how Russell Coutts qualifies given that all his recorded earnings are from his CEO position with Oracle. Wonder where Steve Tew and Andy Martin are in the list? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11335078
Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

TopLeft07 wrote:
Reid NZ's second highest paid sportsman, although I can't see how Russell Coutts qualifies given that all his recorded earnings are from his CEO position with Oracle. Wonder where Steve Tew and Andy Martin and Chris Cairns are in the list?

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c...

fixed (so to speak)

Starting XI
1.1K
·
2.3K
·
over 12 years

[quote=TopLeft07]Reid NZ's second highest paid sportsman, although I can't see how Russell Coutts qualifies given that all his recorded earnings are from his CEO position with Oracle. Wonder where Steve Tew and Andy Martin are in the list?

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11335078[/quote]

Found it interesting how the top three earn so much more than the rest.

WeeNix
150
·
950
·
about 13 years

Love how they give Reid a range of 6-15 mil pounds and then give him the lowest possible value in NZD (12m).

Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years

No way he earns anywhere near 15m pounds though. Pretty shit work from NZH

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

UK75k a week. Thats NZ150k a week, NZ600k a month. Closer to NZ8m

Starting XI
1.6K
·
4.9K
·
about 16 years

David Gold reveals Winston hasn't signed a new deal with the Hammers yet (he would otherwise have been captain against Man Utd):

http://www.squawka.com/news/david-gold-reveals-win...

Guess this makes him a free agent come January? When does his current contract expire?


@Chez394: @davidgold how come winston Reid wasn't captain today. Presume it was based around refusal to commit to club.”

David Gold ✔ @davidgold Probably. dg

11:28 AM - 28 Sep 2014

Starting XI
1.6K
·
4.9K
·
about 16 years

Leggy wrote:

Tegal wrote:

you have seen how the man utd backline have played this season right?

I'm not saying that he might not do a job, just that I doubt that he is LVG's type of player. Has been booked 3 times already this season.

There have been  rumours that Arsenal want him. He is strong in parts of his game but very weak in others. Passing is what lets him down.

http://www.squawka.com/news/david-gold-reveals-win...

"Against Man United, Reid completed 97% of his passes, while he also won three of his four aerial duels.

Furthermore, the commanding centre-back also made seven clearances as West Ham tried to keep out Louis van Gaal’s expensive team."

Trialist
14
·
91
·
over 15 years

Ryan54 wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Might be an unpopular opinion but I think he'd fit in there quite well. They need a bit of leadership from the back in that team. Depends what else is out there and available to them I suppose. They've already spent a fair bit of money, so Reid could represent good value for them. 

Or maybe I should just bow to Leggy's one liner wisdom. 

I reckon not.

Firstly, Man U's defence is not that bad. We have conceded 9 goals in 6 games this season but 5 of those goals came in one single game. That isn't so bad when we are playing 3-5-2 and have a lot of injuries. Plus Blind is decent but hardly a brilliant DM and he has only been there for the last few games. 

Jones, Evans, Rojo, Smalling, Blackett is enough in the centre of defence. I really don't think you can argue Reid is better than any of those guys (except Blackett but he has done well this season). Of course, I would have wanted Reid ahead of McNair on the weekend but McNair played and did well. We are out of the League Cup and have no European football this year so depth isn't really an issue. There is no point us signing another centre back unless they are a player of real quality. 

If Reid is going to go to a big club it would be Arsenal. Arsenal have quality first choice defenders but bad depth. Therefore Reid would help to cover that depth. I think people are deluding themselves if they thought Reid would be anything more than a squad player at a big club.

I think you could definitely argue Reid is at least as good if not better than Jones,Evans and Smalling and nowhere near as injury prone.Jones is extremely overrated,imo.Reid would be a good signing for utd at a reasonable price and I really think are no chance of getting Hummels or any other world class defender soon so why not Reid.
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
over 17 years

matrix wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Might be an unpopular opinion but I think he'd fit in there quite well. They need a bit of leadership from the back in that team. Depends what else is out there and available to them I suppose. They've already spent a fair bit of money, so Reid could represent good value for them. 

Or maybe I should just bow to Leggy's one liner wisdom. 

I reckon not.

Firstly, Man U's defence is not that bad. We have conceded 9 goals in 6 games this season but 5 of those goals came in one single game. That isn't so bad when we are playing 3-5-2 and have a lot of injuries. Plus Blind is decent but hardly a brilliant DM and he has only been there for the last few games. 

Jones, Evans, Rojo, Smalling, Blackett is enough in the centre of defence. I really don't think you can argue Reid is better than any of those guys (except Blackett but he has done well this season). Of course, I would have wanted Reid ahead of McNair on the weekend but McNair played and did well. We are out of the League Cup and have no European football this year so depth isn't really an issue. There is no point us signing another centre back unless they are a player of real quality. 

If Reid is going to go to a big club it would be Arsenal. Arsenal have quality first choice defenders but bad depth. Therefore Reid would help to cover that depth. I think people are deluding themselves if they thought Reid would be anything more than a squad player at a big club.

I think you could definitely argue Reid is at least as good if not better than Jones,Evans and Smalling and nowhere near as injury prone.Jones is extremely overrated,imo.Reid would be a good signing for utd at a reasonable price and I really think are no chance of getting Hummels or any other world class defender soon so why not Reid.

Well we could sign Reid but it isn't going to improve our first team. If we needed more defensive depth then Reid will be ideal. I just think with our lack of fixtures adding another centre defender is a bit pointless. If you bring someone else in then that can cause problems with players who want more game time.

I just don't see depth at the back as a major issue for us. If we sign Reid we should be selling someone else and I don't see what we gain from that.

Trialist
14
·
91
·
over 15 years

Ryan54 wrote:

matrix wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

Tegal wrote:

Might be an unpopular opinion but I think he'd fit in there quite well. They need a bit of leadership from the back in that team. Depends what else is out there and available to them I suppose. They've already spent a fair bit of money, so Reid could represent good value for them. 

Or maybe I should just bow to Leggy's one liner wisdom. 

I reckon not.

Firstly, Man U's defence is not that bad. We have conceded 9 goals in 6 games this season but 5 of those goals came in one single game. That isn't so bad when we are playing 3-5-2 and have a lot of injuries. Plus Blind is decent but hardly a brilliant DM and he has only been there for the last few games. 

Jones, Evans, Rojo, Smalling, Blackett is enough in the centre of defence. I really don't think you can argue Reid is better than any of those guys (except Blackett but he has done well this season). Of course, I would have wanted Reid ahead of McNair on the weekend but McNair played and did well. We are out of the League Cup and have no European football this year so depth isn't really an issue. There is no point us signing another centre back unless they are a player of real quality. 

If Reid is going to go to a big club it would be Arsenal. Arsenal have quality first choice defenders but bad depth. Therefore Reid would help to cover that depth. I think people are deluding themselves if they thought Reid would be anything more than a squad player at a big club.

I think you could definitely argue Reid is at least as good if not better than Jones,Evans and Smalling and nowhere near as injury prone.Jones is extremely overrated,imo.Reid would be a good signing for utd at a reasonable price and I really think are no chance of getting Hummels or any other world class defender soon so why not Reid.

Well we could sign Reid but it isn't going to improve our first team. If we needed more defensive depth then Reid will be ideal. I just think with our lack of fixtures adding another centre defender is a bit pointless. If you bring someone else in then that can cause problems with players who want more game time.

I just don't see depth at the back as a major issue for us. If we sign Reid we should be selling someone else and I don't see what we gain from that.

We wouldnt have to sell anybody in january because Davide Petrucci was named in the 25 official squad and then asked for and was granted a release so we have a spot available.We really only have 4 experienced centre backs 3 of whom are injury prone,I think 1 more is needed.I dont think Van Gaal would want McNair or Blackett playing against the likes of Chelsea,Man City,Arsenal and Liverpool at this stage of their development.
Phoenix Academy
240
·
360
·
almost 11 years

Reid is an improvement for Man U on all their current defenders apart from Rojo.

Trialist
14
·
91
·
over 15 years

happydays wrote:

Reid is an improvement for Man U on all their current defenders apart from Rojo.

Agreed.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up