Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Legend
8.2K
·
15K
·
over 16 years

Wibblebutt wrote:

Dropped 12 places to 148th...

145 Thailand 196(196.12) 143.18 143.18 15.82 7.91 107.30 32.19 64.19 12.84
146 Kyrgyzstan 195(195.44) 110.07 110.07 63.65 31.83 178.46 53.54 0.00 0.00
147 Guinea-Bissau 193(192.68) 81.26 81.26 204.61 102.30 0.00 0.00 45.58 9.12
148 New Zealand 188(187.52) 27.54 27.54 36.39 18.20 317.33 95.20 232.90 46.58
149 Vietnam 187(186.71) 96.99 96.99 122.15 61.08 38.22 11.47 85.86 17.17
150 Afghanistan 183(183.06) 69.82 69.82 94.60 47.30 160.06 48.02 89.61 17.92
150 Guam 183(182.54) 124.43 124.43 64.25 32.13 52.21 15.66 51.60 10.32

Not surprising considering we've only played 1 game last month, Myanmar, drawing 1-1.

in total free fall now! not [playing any games, not going to get any quality opposition to boost the ratings. Unlikely to win cos were playing the young guys to develop the squad. FFS!

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Still in the top 150, take that Afghanistan!!!

Marquee
1.2K
·
8.2K
·
almost 17 years

I formally pledge my allegiance to the mightier football power of Kyrgystan.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

el grapadura wrote:

Still in the top 150, take that Afghanistan!!!

Play them home (Waiouru) & away (Kabul/Khandahar) to settle it.

WeeNix
170
·
510
·
almost 10 years

Message to NZF and coach about latest ranking - PLEASE EXPLAIN!!!! Hudson what are ya!!!!

First Team Squad
75
·
1.3K
·
over 14 years

Can we get a game v Liberia or Cape Verde Islands please as they are moving up.

Mybe not on second thoughts we may get beaten by a top 100 and top 50 team.

How about Benin? Oh no another top 100 team. 

Well Faroe Islands moved down ten spots we must be able to beat them. They can't be much kop now can they. With a population almost as many as that stronghold of NZ football of Invercargill.  Must be weak cos they only get about 1,000 spectators to each league game.

Oh, not another top 85 team.

Just when you think these out of the way places are easy pickings.  They [Faroe Is] have a professional league that is televised and play 27 games in a summer season.  Now just imagine that being done in NZ [3 more years] oh well we will by the time the Faroe Is are a top 50 nation.

Get the idea football in NZ is going down the Brendon Rogers

WeeNix
230
·
620
·
about 9 years

NZ dropped to 159 (worst ranking ever), just 5 places ahead of Samoa and six from American Samoa

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
over 14 years

what are OFCs across the board?

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
Im sure with our strongest sides and wins against myanmar and oman wed be at least below 100 but this is what happens when you pick weak squads
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

Starting XI
950
·
2.3K
·
almost 12 years

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

Oceania should definitely get a full qualification spot for the World Cup though...

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years

Fitzy wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

Oceania should definitely get a full qualification spot for the World Cup though...

Why?

Starting XI
290
·
4.7K
·
almost 17 years

Leggy wrote:

Fitzy wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

Oceania should definitely get a full qualification spot for the World Cup though...

Why?

So obvious isn't it

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
over 14 years

Leggy wrote:

Fitzy wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

Oceania should definitely get a full qualification spot for the World Cup though...

Why?

*whoosh*
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years
Starting XI
2K
·
4.8K
·
almost 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

That's what happens when the confederation's top team plays 4 games a year (mostly against mediocre opposition) and the rest of the confederation plays once every 3/4 years.

Us, NC, Fiji and Tahiti should be all be higher ranked then we are but just don't play unlike your Faroes etc.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Marto wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

That's what happens when the confederation's top team plays 4 games a year (mostly against mediocre opposition) and the rest of the confederation plays once every 3/4 years.

Us, NC, Fiji and Tahiti should be all be higher ranked then we are but just don't play unlike your Faroes etc.

Yeah, get your point, but Faroes are a bad example, they would absolutely destroy the rest of Oceania (and we wouldn't be too far off 50/50 in games against them either).

Phoenix Academy
20
·
300
·
almost 12 years

So after we draw 0-0 with Oman who is ranked 102nd, shouldnt we move up a bit?

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

el grapadura wrote:

Marto wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

what are OFCs across the board?

We're the highest ranked, followed by the Samoas. New Caledonia are 180, the rest are all below them, Fiji 190, Tahiti 191, Solomons 199, Tonga 200, Vanuatu 201, PNG 206.

That's what happens when the confederation's top team plays 4 games a year (mostly against mediocre opposition) and the rest of the confederation plays once every 3/4 years.

Us, NC, Fiji and Tahiti should be all be higher ranked then we are but just don't play unlike your Faroes etc.

Yeah, get your point, but Faroes are a bad example, they would absolutely destroy the rest of Oceania (and we wouldn't be too far off 50/50 in games against them either).

Also we get punished twice for being in a weak confederation. Once because the points are multiplied by less simply because it's OFC, and then again because the teams we play in competitive games are all ranked outside the top 150 until we reach Confeds Cup or WCQ playoffs.

So if we beat Samoa (164) in a WC qualifier we get less ranking points than Germany would get for beating Liechtenstein (163) in a WC qualifier, simply because OFC games get multiplied by less than UEFA games. 

3rd XI
140
·
2.4K
·
about 14 years

161 now . lol .Lowest ranking ever

Lawyerish
1.8K
·
4.8K
·
over 13 years

and surprise spurprise no one from NZ football was available to comment yesterday - all in meetings 

WeeNix
230
·
620
·
about 9 years

Considering results against the Solomons Islands, New Caledonia and PNG, NZ will have 338 points in the next update, which is the same Oman (100th) currently has, so probably again in the top 100? 

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
The rankings are such bollocks. Who cares
LG
Legend
5.6K
·
23K
·
over 16 years

It must be that full on international fixture list & results NZF have had for the last 2 years that has made us sprint up the International League Ladder.

Marquee
7K
·
9.3K
·
over 13 years

TV wrote:
The rankings are such bollocks. Who cares
I agree, but you have to play the game and teams are reluctant to play us because our rankings mean even if they beat us other teams drop. As we get higher we should be able to get games.
Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

Amazing what happens when you actually play games

3rd XI
140
·
2.4K
·
about 14 years

yay back under 100

Marquee
690
·
7.3K
·
over 14 years

up to 88th in the latest rankings out last week.

Starting XI
480
·
4.1K
·
over 14 years
And down 28 places. Don't get these rankings. What happened 4 years ago??
Phoenix Academy
120
·
240
·
almost 17 years

detoxin wrote:
And down 28 places. Don't get these rankings. What happened 4 years ago??

Two WCQ wins over Tahiti in 2012 no longer counted for this ranking.

First Team Squad
520
·
1K
·
over 10 years

In my opinion fifa rankings don't mean anything?

Marquee
1.2K
·
8.2K
·
almost 17 years

Is that an opinion or a question?

One in a million
4.1K
·
9.5K
·
about 17 years

A rhetorical opinion?

Jaume
·
WeeNix
300
·
970
·
almost 8 years

The superior way of ranking national teams is the Elo rankings. Read up on them if you haven't heard of them before, they make much, much more sense.

New Zealand ranked 64th in those which makes a lot more sense. Belgium not ranked #4 in Elo rankings (what they are ranked in FIFA Rankings) because that would be bizarre and FIFA Rankings massively overrate them.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Jaume wrote:

The superior way of ranking national teams is the Elo rankings. Read up on them if you haven't heard of them before, they make much, much more sense.

New Zealand ranked 64th in those which makes a lot more sense. Belgium not ranked #4 in Elo rankings (what they are ranked in FIFA Rankings) because that would be bizarre and FIFA Rankings massively overrate them.

Starting XI
2.5K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Jaume wrote:

The superior way of ranking national teams is the Elo rankings. Read up on them if you haven't heard of them before, they make much, much more sense.

New Zealand ranked 64th in those which makes a lot more sense. Belgium not ranked #4 in Elo rankings (what they are ranked in FIFA Rankings) because that would be bizarre and FIFA Rankings massively overrate them.

Elo isn't an acronym, its a dude's name. He invented the ranking system that chess uses which has been adapted and applied to other sports.

Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years

Nelfoos wrote:

Elo isn't an acronym, its a dude's name. He invented the ranking system that chess uses which has been adapted and applied to other sports.

3rd XI
140
·
2.4K
·
about 14 years

just checked today it was updated om jan 12 and we are 109th .  Pft

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up