All Whites V South Africa | 30 May 7:30pm | The Zookeeper's Son | SS3

WeeNix
5
·
650
·
almost 17 years
Lonegunmen wrote:

So did over a million others...worked late. To be honest with the hype etc, there should be 20k there at least. It is a rarity to get an International here in NZ. Aucklanders should have made the most of it or we'll be getting the games at the Petone Arena.

 

ummm What (AKL) hype ?

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
over 17 years
AJ13 wrote:
jacksafox wrote:

not hard to see why tim payne was released from Blackburn. Average player and poor temperament from the looks. 

Poor temperament? You never heard of a tactical foul?


Usually you're trying to make it as subtle as possible - that was an absolute hack
Marquee
4.5K
·
6.8K
·
about 14 years

Tim Payne was lucky to stay on for the whole game. What was he thinking? This wasn't a life-or-death game.

Trialist
3
·
27
·
almost 11 years
Smithy wrote:
FU BLU wrote:
Lonegunmen wrote:

Hmmm full house against Mexico was our last game.




Sorry didnt realise it was last game only rules ...some of us can remember longer than that ....

BTW ...if your such a fan , should'nt you be there ?
 


I'm sure Gunman would be there if it was in Welly. Were you there?


We had some dire crowds in Wellington in meaningless games against the Islands. I remember those. 


What gives you the right to have a dig at people for not going to the game? 
Phoenix Academy
240
·
360
·
almost 11 years

Quick thoughts after being at the game.

Overall fairly decent - but for a couple of poor crosses could have had a couple of goals. Seemed to tire in the last 30 - lack of match play I guess. Impressed with Boyd but could have done with Wood's strength at times. Rojas and Thomas have touches rarely seen by Kiwi footballers. Durante disappointed me when we have the ball - very slow to distribute and often would delay the simple ball out to his fullback which really killed any impetus. Also reluctant to give it to people like James, Thomas, Rojas when they had a couple of yards of space and resorted to aimless lumps up the park - too used to playing with players with poor first touches.

A huge amount of promise in guys like Boyd, Roux, Tuiloma and even Boxall was pretty solid I thought. Add in Reid, Smith and Wood and there's a lot to like. Let's hope we play regularly in the 2nd half of the year

One in a million
4.4K
·
9.6K
·
over 17 years

A few touches of excitement late in first half, but not much to wrote home about. Much as I like attackers playing tictac passes through the middle of a defence, we didn't stretch them out wide often enough. Good energy from Tyler, but no one held the ball up for the midfielders to work off.
I guess overall, we didn't lose and people got some game time.

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
about 13 years

Ozzzzies trumpeting they are finally ready for a World Cup. 1 all draw with SA must have been their proof-Until tonight. 

Who's arm pits smell. Crash n Burn in the lower America 

Marquee
1.4K
·
5.3K
·
about 17 years
Joey Johns wrote:

ryan thomas is soo good. roux started off shit until he got good, rojas been alright when he gets the chance. that guy with long dreadlocks in soufafricas team is good.

Their most capped player in the current squad. He was off contract last season before re-signing with Chiefs. I did suggest him in last seasons transfer rumours thread. 
Trialist
3
·
66
·
almost 16 years

tactical foul? that really? that was an awful tackle that deserved red. Had it been earlier in the game and he had been sent we would have been down to ten? not so tactical in my opinion. a minute before it he was lucky not be booked for another rubbish tackle. had he actually been able to make a pass tonight there would have been no need for either. 

First Team Squad
1.1K
·
1.7K
·
almost 16 years

Was at game.

Thought it was overall good, liked the way we played (no hoofball yaddy yaa)

Crowd was getting impatient and calling for shots from 30 yards out but they should be ignored imo

Thomas had some moments of awesomeness definitely a stand out player, looked frustrated with those around him. The whole skill level of the All Whites looked really good though and I was impressed.

Excited for the future.

First Team Squad
1.3K
·
1.3K
·
over 13 years

Traveled up to Auckland today for the game and definitely enjoyed the trip, some thoughts though:

Thought our defense was fairly solid however I think some of the passing at the back looked shaky and some of our defenders were caught ball watching. Roux stood out for me at the back. 

Tim Payne is not the man for the job, the transition between our defense and midfield wasn't that smooth and there was a lot of play a good defensive midfielder would have broken up.

Our attacking players were fairly exciting and I think with wood up front to hold up the ball and score goals we would have come away with a result. In future if Tim Payne is going to be a permanent fixture in the squad i'd like to see him and Tuiloma both as defensive midfielders at the same time. Would provide our defense with a lot more cover and we would have less players in the attacking 3rd which might free up some space. 

Just some thoughts, I'm happy the South Africans didn't win, it shut their fans up.

Starting XI
50
·
3.2K
·
almost 15 years
FU BLU wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Lonegunmen wrote:

9,266. Wtf Auckland!


Give it a rest.

 


Seriously. That is a fucking poor effort. People like you, for example, should be there.




Still 6000 more than I remember their being at the Caketin ......

6000 on a Wednesday night in a southerly with no marketing against an island nation in a city of 300,000 people. Nice logic, time to go back to the knitting circle.
Marquee
7.8K
·
9.6K
·
almost 14 years
CboZ wrote:
FU BLU wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Lonegunmen wrote:

9,266. Wtf Auckland!


Give it a rest.

 


Seriously. That is a fucking poor effort. People like you, for example, should be there.




Still 6000 more than I remember their being at the Caketin ......


6000 on a Wednesday night in a southerly with no marketing against an island nation in a city of 300,000 people. Nice logic, time to go back to the knitting circle.



When was that? Last game I remember (prior to Mexico) at the cake tin was Paraguay - which was more thank half full I think.
Starting XI
1.5K
·
4.9K
·
about 16 years
Mainland FC wrote:
Mainland FC wrote:

Musa on. Finally some hope for a scoring result tonight.


And Brockie! To break a duck?
Yeah, Brockie, the only way he'll break a duck is by hitting a flock of them with a goal attempt as they fly over the stadium !!!
Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
over 17 years

Just got back from the game.  A reasonably good effort from a young team.  I can certainly see though why we haven't signed Payne, he was absolutely honking.  At least 3 of South Africa's good chances came directly from him giving away the ball, and as for that tackle, i'm not sure how it looked on TV and what angle you got, but from the stand you could see him lining the guy up from 5 meters out.  No idea how he stayed on the field after that.

Starting XI
1.5K
·
4.9K
·
about 16 years
Smithy wrote:
FU BLU wrote:
Lonegunmen wrote:

Hmmm full house against Mexico was our last game.




Sorry didnt realise it was last game only rules ...some of us can remember longer than that ....

BTW ...if your such a fan , should'nt you be there ?
 


I'm sure Gunman would be there if it was in Welly. Were you there?


We had some dire crowds in Wellington in meaningless games against the Islands. I remember those. 

We pack 'em in vs. tin pot opposition in the South Island - there would be over-crowding and riots in the stands if a team like South Africa played down here... 
 

10,751 last time the AW's played in Christchurch WCQ vs. Tahiti October 2012 on a cold night in a temporary stadium.

9000 in Dunedin for AW's vs. New Caledonia WCQ, March 2013

10,000 in Christchurch for AW's vs. Malaysia friendly 2006 (neither side particularly strong - Christie, Hickey, Fisher, Old, Barron, Webster started, Jeff Fleming on the bench) 



All Whites and Malaysia line up, QE II Stadium, Christchurch Feb 19 2006

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
over 17 years
Smithy wrote:
We had some dire crowds in Wellington in meaningless games against the Islands. I remember those. 


The smallest I've ever been in were Island nation qualifiers in Auckland.  Mostly afternoon games at NHS in front of hundreds.
Marquee
690
·
7.3K
·
about 15 years

Sorry these are a bit old...

Wed, 28 May 2014 7:57a.m. TEST
Neil Emblen, the man in charge of the All Whites ahead of their clash with South Africa joins us now
http://www.radiolivesport.co.nz/Neil-Emblen/tabid/454/articleID/18626/Default.aspx

Thu, 29 May 2014 8:56a.m. TEST
We speak now with All Whites Midfielder Chris James ahead of their clash with South Africa
http://www.radiolivesport.co.nz/Chris-James/tabid/454/articleID/18648/Default.aspx

Harry Ngata: All whites v South Africa

Friday, May 30, 2014
Former All White Harry Ngata talks to the CGW Breakfast ahead of NZ's friendly against South Africa.
http://www.radiosport.co.nz/audio/1246839934-harry-ngata--all-whites-v-south-africa


CGW | All Whites Skills Challenge


Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

Ok so 4 of us went to the game last night and I have to ask having read this thread, what game was I watching cause I have a completely different view to everyone here. What I watched definitely does not marry up with what I read here and I am seriously wondering if I was slipped something in my lemonade. 

To post what we saw (which is in complete contrast to what is posted here)

Payne was a beast and owned it

Wee Mac and James went missing a lot

Roux called his own number to press forward rather than giving Rojas the early ball and service to let the better footballer do the work

Thomas did not do much, Boyd is not a striker and really needs a left foot badly

Nice interplay and football and good to see less long hoof ball. This is the right style to be playing.

We were good for 30mins, they were good for 60

How aggressive were the South Africans? We saw them run at every foul and pushed the ref twice. For a friendly, they were an aggro lot.


As an aside (and I seriously do wonder if I walked into a different game) Aucklanders suck. Low turn out, no atmosphere. I'm not taking aim at the White Noise but they were quiet. Placing them behind a goal was a dumb move I thought when they would have been better in the crowd and had people around them to rally in others. Whomever put them there needs a bullet. You may as well have stuck them in cow corner and it would have been equally effective. Bad move NZF

Oh yeah, did I say that Aucklanders suck??


I'm off for a lie down. I feel very confused that I imagined all this last night now cause it does not marry up with what 90% of other posters and what they saw.


Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years
Jeff Vader wrote:

Ok so 4 of us went to the game last night and I have to ask having read this thread, what game was I watching cause I have a completely different view to everyone here. What I watched definitely does not marry up with what I read here and I am seriously wondering if I was slipped something in my lemonade. 

To post what we saw (which is in complete contrast to what is posted here)

Payne was a beast and owned it

Wee Mac and James went missing a lot

Roux called his own number to press forward rather than giving Rojas the early ball and service to let the better footballer do the work

Thomas did not do much, Boyd is not a striker and really needs a left foot badly

Nice interplay and football and good to see less long hoof ball. This is the right style to be playing.

We were good for 30mins, they were good for 60

How aggressive were the South Africans? We saw them run at every foul and pushed the ref twice. For a friendly, they were an aggro lot.


As an aside (and I seriously do wonder if I walked into a different game) Aucklanders suck. Low turn out, no atmosphere. I'm not taking aim at the White Noise but they were quiet. Placing them behind a goal was a dumb move I thought when they would have been better in the crowd and had people around them to rally in others. Whomever put them there needs a bullet. You may as well have stuck them in cow corner and it would have been equally effective. Bad move NZF

Oh yeah, did I say that Aucklanders suck??


I'm off for a lie down. I feel very confused that I imagined all this last night now cause it does not marry up with what 90% of other posters and what they saw.


I agree with this almost entirely.

I also saw people on here bagging Dura and I thought he was one of our best
Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
about 17 years

My decision to have the Noise behind the goal.

Aucklanders don't "rally" around the white noise (or Fever) they whinge.

We have seen this at every Auckland game the last three or more years.

As for the rest I think you were drunk.

First Team Squad
1.1K
·
1.7K
·
almost 16 years
Smithy wrote:

My decision to have the Noise behind the goal.

Aucklanders don't "rally" around the white noise (or Fever) they whinge.

We have seen this at every Auckland game the last three or more years.

As for the rest I think you were drunk.

alas a few were still whinging from the white noise zone!
Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years
Smithy wrote:

My decision to have the Noise behind the goal.

Aucklanders don't "rally" around the white noise (or Fever) they whinge.

We have seen this at every Auckland game the last three or more years.

As for the rest I think you were drunk.

The last line is what I am seriously wondering which is not good for a recovering alcoholic.
Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
about 17 years

I think what encouraged most people (me anyway) was that we played on the deck. All the time. And didn't look afraid to play it short under pressure. I thought the approach was encouraging and those young fellas you've bagged were bloody exciting I reckon.


Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
almost 14 years

Dura's distribution was glacial.

Starting XI
3
·
3.1K
·
over 17 years

Thought payne was poor and midfield in general not up to it. We neither kept the ball under pressure, nor were prepared to be available to receive in middle of the park. Hence, had v little structured possession in their half, and relied on break outs and loose ball going forward. We also really missed wood's ability to hold the ball up and win some headers when we lumped it forward, and we didn't have a proper goal scorer on the pitch either. 

Boxall played really well, rojas (despite a couple of wayward balls) was decent and involved in most our best moments. He can be flighty but is still incisive. Roux was solid. I can't remember too much of thomas.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years
Smithy wrote:

I think what encouraged most people (me anyway) was that we played on the deck. All the time. And didn't look afraid to play it short under pressure. I thought the approach was encouraging and those young fellas you've bagged were bloody exciting I reckon.

I think I really need to see a replay.
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

There were spells where we strung together some really nice fluid quick passing, but overall it was a pretty disjointed and scrappy effort. Some of the passing was just aimless around the back because SA weren't pressing, and when they did start to press we looked shaky very quickly. Neither Boyd or Brockie are suited to playing as a sole striker and consequently we struggled to get the ball out of the middle of the park. Rojas didn't look match fit to me either.

Given the youth of our squad and the fact we were missing several key players it was encouraging overall I guess.

Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
over 17 years
Jeff Vader wrote:

Ok so 4 of us went to the game last night and I have to ask having read this thread, what game was I watching cause I have a completely different view to everyone here. What I watched definitely does not marry up with what I read here and I am seriously wondering if I was slipped something in my lemonade. 

To post what we saw (which is in complete contrast to what is posted here)

Payne was a beast and owned it

Wee Mac and James went missing a lot

Roux called his own number to press forward rather than giving Rojas the early ball and service to let the better footballer do the work

Thomas did not do much, Boyd is not a striker and really needs a left foot badly

Nice interplay and football and good to see less long hoof ball. This is the right style to be playing.

We were good for 30mins, they were good for 60

How aggressive were the South Africans? We saw them run at every foul and pushed the ref twice. For a friendly, they were an aggro lot.


As an aside (and I seriously do wonder if I walked into a different game) Aucklanders suck. Low turn out, no atmosphere. I'm not taking aim at the White Noise but they were quiet. Placing them behind a goal was a dumb move I thought when they would have been better in the crowd and had people around them to rally in others. Whomever put them there needs a bullet. You may as well have stuck them in cow corner and it would have been equally effective. Bad move NZF

Oh yeah, did I say that Aucklanders suck??


I'm off for a lie down. I feel very confused that I imagined all this last night now cause it does not marry up with what 90% of other posters and what they saw.



Agreed with a lot of this (esp. on Roux, Thomas and Boyd) but you do realise it was McGlinchey in 8 and Payne in 18 right? :P  I'm looking forward to watching the replay on TV, as it sometimes give a complete different perspective - but it would take to swing me your way on Payne!
Marquee
740
·
5.2K
·
about 17 years

Watched a small amount as I had to go to work, but have recorded it.


Two questions:


a) Should I watch it?

b) Did anyone notice how small the crowd was?


First Team Squad
330
·
1.7K
·
almost 12 years
aitkenmike wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:

Ok so 4 of us went to the game last night and I have to ask having read this thread, what game was I watching cause I have a completely different view to everyone here. What I watched definitely does not marry up with what I read here and I am seriously wondering if I was slipped something in my lemonade. 

To post what we saw (which is in complete contrast to what is posted here)

Payne was a beast and owned it

Wee Mac and James went missing a lot

Roux called his own number to press forward rather than giving Rojas the early ball and service to let the better footballer do the work

Thomas did not do much, Boyd is not a striker and really needs a left foot badly

Nice interplay and football and good to see less long hoof ball. This is the right style to be playing.

We were good for 30mins, they were good for 60

How aggressive were the South Africans? We saw them run at every foul and pushed the ref twice. For a friendly, they were an aggro lot.


As an aside (and I seriously do wonder if I walked into a different game) Aucklanders suck. Low turn out, no atmosphere. I'm not taking aim at the White Noise but they were quiet. Placing them behind a goal was a dumb move I thought when they would have been better in the crowd and had people around them to rally in others. Whomever put them there needs a bullet. You may as well have stuck them in cow corner and it would have been equally effective. Bad move NZF

Oh yeah, did I say that Aucklanders suck??


I'm off for a lie down. I feel very confused that I imagined all this last night now cause it does not marry up with what 90% of other posters and what they saw.



Agreed with a lot of this (esp. on Roux, Thomas and Boyd) but you do realise it was McGlinchey in 8 and Payne in 18 right? :P  I'm looking forward to watching the replay on TV, as it sometimes give a complete different perspective - but it would take to swing me your way on Payne!


Yeah, Payne was pretty bad... very disappointing.
Marquee
7.8K
·
9.6K
·
almost 14 years
ForteanTimes wrote:

Watched a small amount as I had to go to work, but have recorded it.


Two questions:


a) Should I watch it?

b) Did anyone notice how small the crowd was?




a) Watch the first half
b) The crowd was all in one stand so didn't look bad.
Starting XI
280
·
2.7K
·
almost 17 years

Thought payne was poor and midfield in general not up to it. We neither kept the ball under pressure, nor were prepared to be available to receive in middle of the park. Hence, had v little structured possession in their half, and relied on break outs and loose ball going forward. We also really missed wood's ability to hold the ball up and win some headers when we lumped it forward, and we didn't have a proper goal scorer on the pitch either. 

Boxall played really well, rojas (despite a couple of wayward balls) was decent and involved in most our best moments. He can be flighty but is still incisive. Roux was solid. I can't remember too much of thomas.


A fair bit of this.

We looked exciting once we broke the press, but we were awful in transition most of the time, especially through the last twenty minutes of the first half when we backed off too much. We didn't seem to have much of a plan for building the attack, but I think that has more to do with a lack of familiarity between some of the players and Emblem spent the week working on defensive shape, which paid off in the end.

Payne was given a role where he could not stand out unless he was poor, and well, yeah. And that tackle, fucking hell.

Thomas looked to get on the ball and beat his man, but their right back was up to the task and it meant he missed a few easy passes that made more sense than running with the ball. I remember one point in the first half when he had someone in acres of space on the overlap and he ran into traffic on the edge of the area.

It all looked promising to me, especially when I think about how much stronger we will be with Reid, Smith, and Wood. The biggest problem area we have now against top sides is central midfield. I think the calls on here for Tuiloma as the ball-winner are decent shouts, but who would slot in at full-back?
Marquee
1.2K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years

Roux to LB, Boxall to RB, Reid and Smith in the middle?

First Team Squad
330
·
1.7K
·
almost 12 years

Glad to see Musa again for a bit. He impressed me at the Olympics in London and looked good in his cameo at LB and CB last night. Would have him back at the Nix fo sure.

WeeNix
120
·
730
·
over 14 years

A pretty good effort from a team that doesn't play very much- definitely lacking in attack.

I wish they would end this "experiment" of taking football to Auckland.

Auckland and football just doesn't work. It never has and probably never will.  Repeat five hundred times until embedded on your soul.

Any major football should only be played in Christchurch or Wellington (nothing much against Dunedin, it's just a bitch to get to).

Anyone with enough interest will simply go to the game, both cities are as well connected as anywhere else in the country and travel to either is relatively cheap. Like the Phoenix "home-away" nonsense that only served to dilute the local fan involvement, thus preventing any impetus to grow committed fan numbers, the same applies to major internationals with the national squad.

I say again, Football= Wellington or Christchurch.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Thought payne was poor and midfield in general not up to it. We neither kept the ball under pressure, nor were prepared to be available to receive in middle of the park. Hence, had v little structured possession in their half, and relied on break outs and loose ball going forward. We also really missed wood's ability to hold the ball up and win some headers when we lumped it forward, and we didn't have a proper goal scorer on the pitch either. 

Boxall played really well, rojas (despite a couple of wayward balls) was decent and involved in most our best moments. He can be flighty but is still incisive. Roux was solid. I can't remember too much of thomas.

Agree with the above. Best player on the park by far was the dreadlocked Safa No.12. If we had a player like him in midfield our FIFA ranking would push on by 20/30. But it may not happen for another 20/30 years.

Nice to see the minute's silence for Duncan C. Respect.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

........... and at the Zoo....


 

Starting XI
280
·
2.7K
·
almost 17 years
Oska wrote:

Roux to LB, Boxall to RB, Reid and Smith in the middle?



That would probably have to be it. It also wouldn't be too big a change given that Tuiloma doesn't seem to want to get forward much.

Incidentally, there was a moment last night that proved Boxall's pace to me. He outpaced a sprinting South African to a loose ball while looking like he was barely moving. I do now buy the rumour that he is one of the quickest Nix players.
Marquee
740
·
5.2K
·
about 17 years
Smithy wrote:

My decision to have the Noise behind the goal.

Aucklanders don't "rally" around the white noise (or Fever) they whinge.

We have seen this at every Auckland game the last three or more years.

As for the rest I think you were drunk.




And the positives, if any, of the Auckland supporters were?

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up