So I’ve seen 4 ½ All Whites matches in the past six months or so. And I feel like maybe I’m going too far in a negative direction, but here’s my thought….
I don’t think I’ll get much argument here that the best AW players are Bindon, Surman, Crocombe, Stamenic, Bell and Wood. After that I’d make a case for Cacace, Boxall and probably Rufer. I think come the World Cup there will be at least one match where I’d say Bazely should go 4-2-3-1 with three attacking players behind Wood. But I also think there will be at least one match where I’d get all of the above on the pitch together and go with a 5-3-2 with Rufer, Bell and Stamenic.
It’s very conservative, but that’s going to be a hard midfield to play through. If you can force the opposition to the flanks, I like your odds with Surman, Boxall and Bindon in the air and they’re very sharp defending in and around the area either way. There won’t be a lot created in attack, but with Wood and the quality of your set pieces, you might be able to nick one. And I hopefully you can still hold your share of possession with that midfield.
Secondary question… has Cacace or de Vries ever played right back? I love de Vries’ set piece delivery and crossing, but Cacace is the better player on the whole IMO. But it seems like there’s no obvious right back solution… could they both get on the pitch as fullbacks? And I don’t know who plays off of Wood. Just? Old? Garbett? I think I’d lean to one of those three with Old maybe being my favourite of that bunch at the moment. I’ve never seen Rogerson, but a fair few of you seem to rate him ATM.
My two cents. Am I being too cautious and not rating your attacking players highly enough? As I say, I’m not saying do this every match, but I think there will be a time and a place for it next June. And I would rather find a way to get Boxall and Rufer on the pitch ahead of McCowatt or Singh (though I’ve seen flashes out of Singh).