WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years
NZ Fifa Rankings to drop to between 139 and 149
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years

Ok, We all know the Fifa rankings system is a bit complicated and I hope I have made a mistake.

But according to my calculations when next months FIFA rankings come out we are going to have only 148 points compared to our 183 we have at the moment. Even though we drew with Wales.

They have changed the way they do the fifa rankings. It doesnt matter how many goals you get etc and away games. it is based on a rolling 48 months, most recent 12 months getting the most weighting.
 
The formula for points per game is P = M x I x T x C x 100 x how recent the game was. Look it up on FIFA to understand.
My calcs for the Wales game is 125 points. Unfortunately you have to divide this by the number of games you have played in the last 12 months (Min 5) we have played 4, Wales, Cost, Vene, Brazil. But we have to divide our 125 by 5. Which is only 25 points gained for the year so far from the Wales game(Our only Result).
 
Because the results of the Georgian win 3-1 and Estonia draw 1-1 have now rolled back into over 12 months. The points from those games get x by .50 for being last year. They were both ranked a similar ranking to Wales. So basically we had two results last year compared to one this year. And most of the weighting goes to the last 12 months.( thats why we will be dropping)
 
Other factors are our WCQ games back in 2004 are starting to drop off the calc. And wins against those island nations were giving us  80 to 90 points x .20(for being so long ago). Only one of these dropped off for this recent estimate i am making.
 
The only thing I am not sure about is whether you have to divide the previous years points by the number of games we played in that particular 12 months.( I think you must have to). In which case I probably need to tweak it down further as in 04 we only played 3 games(not calender year, but rolling fifa year, ie june 04 - may -05) So I should have divided those points by min 5 not 3. This would mean we are on 118 points and would drop to 149th(as the table stands of course).
 
Anyway doesn't really seem right? Surely the other countries would get effected by this. I had a quick look at Fiji. Wondered how they could be on 119 points. They never play. Well you dont lose points for not playing. They beat India twice in Aug 2005. Probably still living off these points. I also had a look at Scotland, how are they ranked 14th in the world - Answer: they beat France and would have got over 1400 points for that game alone. The more games they start to lose in euro 2008 though the more their points get divided by games played. They won't drop to much or at all next month, because they haven't played since March. There movement will be based on teams passing them, which is likely.
 
If I am correct, then it is going to pay to play the Island nations as much as possible and win.and the Malaysia and singapores. Much more than the previous ranking system. As long as we dont play teams outside the top 200. We should still get 50 points or more each game. Once we have our build up games and WCQ later this year. Watch us catapault up the FIFA rankings.
 
Can someone else have a look at this please? My brain is dead now. Links below to the rules.
 
LondonChris2007-05-31 04:01:15
Phoenix Academy
1
·
300
·
about 17 years
nah if i look my one brain cell would explode so i just nod and agree with ya. although it's abit gloomy being so low just now
First Team Squad
9
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
115.625 points from the match.
Draw = 1.0
Importance = 1.0 friendly
Strength = 1.25 (200-75th place)
Confederation = .925 ((1+.85)/2)
Times 100
You have to do it for each match going back 4 years.
Then apply 100% last 12 months, 50% 2 years ago, 30% 3 years ago & 20% four years ago.
Moving from eight years to four really cooked NZ because of the lack of games in the middle of the decade and not doing a full 5 games every year.
First Team Squad
9
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
Beating Wales would have given us 346.875 points.
First Team Squad
9
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
My reading is that yes, we divide by 5, so the 115.625 becomes 23.125 points.
How many points are we losing from four year ago? 
First Team Squad
270
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years
edward l wrote:
Confederation = .925 ((1+.85)/2)
 
I calculated everything the same except the confederation part. I just took 1 for the confederation as wales are in the European confederation. UEFA with a regional rating of 1.0
South America is just below them and the rest of the confederations are 0.85.
 
I chuck the other results in a spreadsheet to calculate the rest going back 4 years. A bit geeky I know. But we havent had that many results so wasnt to hard to chuck them in. Just estimating their ranking at the time based on Fifa charts was the least accurate bit.
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years
edward l wrote:
How many points are we losing from four year ago? 
We are only losing one loss to australia and one win against one of the islands in the WCQ. So about 80 x .20 = 16 ish
 
 
 
LondonChris2007-05-31 10:35:46
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years
TheJam wrote:
You guys not getting out much?
 
LOL. I was thinking of posting this one anonymously.
Marquee
590
·
7K
·
about 17 years
Far out, that stuff is way beyond me. I will leave it to you guys. Enjoy.
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
Bit dissapointing I was expecting a big rise! but I got a headache so will not join you to work that stuff out.
Tegal Fan Club Member #3
46
·
7.8K
·
about 17 years
 
 
this uganda boy is bril at maths.. just ask him
Starting XI
10
·
2.1K
·
about 17 years
Celtic, didn't you change your username after spamming the forums a few weeks ago?
Tegal Fan Club Member #3
46
·
7.8K
·
about 17 years
Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
149th? f**k that's poor. But the rankings are sh*t anyway.
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
it will *hopefully* pick up after a few WCQ
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years
It will help our ranking playing in the WCQ a bit because those games count as 2.5 as far as match importance compared to x 1 for a friendly. So a wins will get us 2.5 times the points. We might get 380 points for a win. Which will help our average of all games in the last 12 months.
 
3(points for a win)x .60(Strength of opposition) x 2.5(match importance) x .85(Oceania team) x 100 = 382.50.
 
The best way to improve ranking though is to keep getting results and beating the higher ranked teams. If we can win against the 5th place Asian team twice. Then we will jump up the ranking. Oops, that would also mean we qualified for the World Cup, maybe I am getting ahead of myself.
 
First Team Squad
9
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
We need the WCQ games simply to stay still in the rankings, as the games from four years ago will be removed.  We will probably dip anyway as I thought those qualifiers were earlier in the year than this year's WCQs in October November.
There is a window in September for friendlies, but WCQ count as 2.5 greater than a friendly, so lets focus on them.
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years

Well I was close on my ranking estimate. But the result was worse than I guessed.

My lowest estimate was 149. View actual latest ranking below.
Ranking Team +/- Pts
Jun 2007 153 Myanmar 3 154 New Zealand -27 155 Grenada 1
 
154!!!!!!!!!!
LondonChris2007-06-13 20:17:10
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
Superb, we should get some t-shirts with '154th and proud' on them made.
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
Sucks we could smash all those temas.
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
Hard News wrote:
Superb, we should get some t-shirts with '154th and proud' on them made.


i'd get one...if it was affordable
Starting XI
31
·
2.5K
·
about 17 years
This means we are only better that 53 teams in the world that actually play football. Considering that includes all the pacific nations and the places in Asia and Africa that no one has heard of I see it as a bit of a crock. We are one place below Myanmar. Thats almost Miramar and I'm pretty sure the AW's would beat them.
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
Depends who makes themselves available... Butters, Little and Steve Jones could all cause us issues. Hard News2007-06-14 12:20:41
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
Why doesn`t footballnz consider playing some teams in the Asian confederation? It would make sense as that is our path to the world cup.
Starting XI
10
·
2.1K
·
about 17 years
The asian nations playign at home against NZ are more likely to generate big crowds too, and therefore more match revenue, becasue European fans tend to be a bit more fickle about "freindlies".
 
A game against the likes of China, Indonesia (maybe) or Korea would generate good income espcaially good of a gate-share could be arranged.
Starting XI
2.2K
·
4.9K
·
about 17 years
phil_style wrote:
The asian nations playign at home against NZ are more likely to generate big crowds too, and therefore more match revenue, becasue European fans tend to be a bit more fickle about "freindlies".
 
A game against the likes of China, Indonesia (maybe) or Korea would generate good income espcaially good of a gate-share could be arranged.
 
I agree, playing the European and South American teams has smashed our ranking.  Whereas playing teams such as China and Korea, especially in NZ would see alot of the Asian expats to come out and support (the visiting team obviously).
Marquee
590
·
7K
·
about 17 years

Those fifa-world rankings are not reliable when it comes to ranking countries like New Zealand who have a good team but don't play a heap of games. The All Whites are far better than the vast majority of the teams ranked below 100.loyalgunner2007-06-15 22:16:37
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years

Those fifa-world rankings are not reliable when it comes to ranking countries like New Zealand who have a good team but don't play a heap of games. 
 
As long as you play at least 5 games a year you should be able to do all right in the rankings. As long as you win some of those games of course.
 
It is also measured over the last 4 years. So the fact that we only played one game in 2005 when we lost to australia means we got no points for that whole year.
LondonChris2007-06-25 20:30:28
First Team Squad
120
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
Exactly - also friendlies are worth less than competitive games. So joining Asia would mean we'd have qualifying every 2 years (WC &AC), rankings would definately improve.
Starting XI
2.2K
·
4.9K
·
about 17 years
And playing clubs.  Its about time we stop that rubbish, Wales Scotland and England have never done but we still do.  Its embarrising losing to a club.
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years

I think we should just play teams whose world rankings are just higher than us and very slowly move upwards we should also get some more home games even if its just against poor teams. 

First Team Squad
9
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
Hard News wrote:
Superb, we should get some t-shirts with '154th and proud' on them made.
Yes, 154th.  Venuzela 70th and Wales 75th.  If we played regularly we might be 80 something.  It was nice getting down to 45th around 2002.
And tee-shirts, absolutely yes.
Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
So would we be the lowest ranked nation at the u20 and u17 world cups respectively?
First Team Squad
13
·
1.7K
·
about 17 years
gonig by senior rankings i would assume so...
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years

We would be the lowest rank at those levels as  well. Except for maybe Haiti at the u17's. as half their team jumped ship in New york on the way to korea.

Phoenix Academy
0
·
290
·
about 17 years
The silly thing about all of this is that the game probalby missed the cut off for the monthly rankings. Don't panic until next months rankings are released. If we don't go up, then start bitching to Ricki
 
 
WeeNix
21
·
860
·
about 17 years
The silly thing about all of this is that the game probalby missed the cut off for the monthly rankings. Don't panic until next months rankings are released. If we don't go up, then start bitching to Ricki
 
 
 
Maybe, it will be interesting to see if there is any movement. My pick is we will drop further!
 
In fact. I will put it out there.
 
My prediction is we are going to be on about 75-80 points. 20 less than the moment.
 
My Ranking prediction for next month is............160 down 6 places
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
we just need to play more games agianst sensible oppsition teams that we can beat there is no point playing a team like Brazil who are just going to beat us.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up