Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
about 17 years
That definition is sure met by a World Cup qualifying match being hosted by NZ.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
220
·
about 17 years

�You can understand FIFA�s view. If we didn�t stop the match, we set a really bad precedent that would cause chaos within the football world,� Nicholas said. (from nz soccer website).

For Fifa it really is all about the precedent that would be set by allowing a team to have visas refused. Fiji should not have forced the issue.
Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years
Gare wrote:
See below - this means that the Fiji Sevens team will always be granted Visa's, as the sevens is an international tournament.... so we will see the Fiji team here next year...  Its not quite a double standard

Fijian sports teams and Fijian sportspeople at all levels will be banned from coming to New Zealand for the purposes of sport, unless international sporting and legal obligations require otherwise.

As provided for in arrangements after the 2000 coup, where New Zealand is hosting an international sports tournament which requires acceptance of international participants, entry will not be banned, subject to those concerned meeting other immigration requirements.




 Ummmmm, the FIFA World Cup is the biggest international sporitng tournament of them all. We are hosting games here and are obliged to abide by FIFA's rules, which require the acceptance of international participants.
 
It is a total f**king double standard by the NZ Government!
 
terminator_x2007-10-12 16:57:53
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
about 17 years
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?

Yeah i don`t get that either.
First Team Squad
0
·
1.8K
·
about 17 years
just a quick question does this mean the phoenix boys can play sunday?
Trialist
0
·
120
·
about 17 years
Fiji arn't to blame.  Thhey shouldn't be in this position in the first place.  Its crazy.  I would have never predicted I would have felt so angry at this.  Where are those to greeks,  they have had nothing to say and that QPR guy?
Marquee
230
·
7.6K
·
about 17 years
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?
 
Fiji should've taken it up the rear as expected.
Trialist
0
·
120
·
about 17 years
Phoenix Academy
0
·
220
·
about 17 years
sanday wrote:
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?

Yeah i don`t get that either.
 
It's an over reaction. They are just doing it to make a scene. To get the match called off over this matter i think is crap. If it was more than one player...ok fair enough maybe.
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
about 17 years
So you think the FIFA rules should be amended to state that political involvement is okay up to a limit of one player?
 
 
Phoenix Academy
0
·
300
·
almost 17 years
yo dude its there #1 goalie it would be like killen not getting a visa for us
Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
about 17 years
sanday wrote:
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?

Yeah i don`t get that either.
 
Dave is an idiot.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
300
·
almost 17 years
TouchMe wrote:
just a quick question does this mean the phoenix boys can play sunday?
 
no ones quite sure not even the phoenix
Phoenix Academy
0
·
300
·
almost 17 years
sanday wrote:
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?

Yeah i don`t get that either.
 
Dave is an idiot.
 
your quite straight up aren't you frankie lol
Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
about 17 years
I just don't like stupid people (apart from Feverish).
 
Basically saying "It is only 1 player, so they should bend over and take it" - either trying to wind people up, or just plain stupid.
WeeNix
0
·
610
·
about 17 years
I think FIFA have their head in the sand if they expect any government to roll over and admit someone just because they are representing a national footie side. Can you imagine the US changing their mind if someone who didn't pass muster for whatever reason tried to get in as a member of a national footie side? No chance.
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
about 17 years
I just don't like stupid people (apart from Feverish).
 
Basically saying "It is only 1 player, so they should bend over and take it" - either trying to wind people up, or just plain stupid.
 
The other possibility is that his father in law is Winston Peters
SiNZ2007-10-12 17:14:48
Phoenix Academy
0
·
300
·
almost 17 years
rightstr wrote:
I think FIFA have their head in the sand if they expect any government to roll over and admit someone just because they are representing a national footie side. Can you imagine the US changing their mind if someone who didn't pass muster for whatever reason tried to get in as a member of a national footie side? No chance.
 
yeah but its only his girlfriends dad! He might not of even met him and whos to say that they might not break up next week!
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
about 17 years
rightstr wrote:
I think FIFA have their head in the sand if they expect any government to roll over and admit someone just because they are representing a national footie side. Can you imagine the US changing their mind if someone who didn't pass muster for whatever reason tried to get in as a member of a national footie side? No chance.
 
If this guy was a terrorist or something, then FIFA would be having the guy not allowed to play.
 
His girlfriend's dad is in the army or something. It doesn't even meet the NZ sanctions as defined. It's not family and this is a NZ hosted international sporting event where the player concerned otherwise meets visa requirements (unless there is some unrevealed fact that the NZ government are sitting on).
Marquee
230
·
7.6K
·
about 17 years
Winston's on air.  I think I'm going to puke.
Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
about 17 years
Seatter was just on Newstalk ZB - I felt he should have been a bit more "f**kING c**tS IN THE BEEHIVE - I"LL SMASH THE c**tS.  WHO ARE YA, WHO ARE YA"
Phoenix Academy
0
·
220
·
about 17 years
sanday wrote:
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?

Yeah i don`t get that either.
 
Dave is an idiot.
 
Justify it.
 
Im not offended-u use the word idiot more than any other.. Pkus i dont think very highly of u ay.
(are u really so thin that u'd dance around topless on international tv)
 
I just think its an over reaction and Unnecessary. I am not alone in thinking that. I'll admit its probably equal in terms of the nz govt over reacting by disallowing a visa.
Dave572007-10-12 17:24:12
Legend
7.4K
·
15K
·
over 16 years
So it is political interference when NZ applies its immigration rules, but not when FIFA tells us to change them especially for a Fijian soccer player?
 
Fiji kicked out our high commissioner. They are run by a military dictator. Some people there live under a curfew, and now have to retire at 55 and take a mandatory salary cut.
 
FIFA Fairplay or blatter bs?
 
I'm sure Fijians have an opinion on this, if they were allowed to...
 
sorry to go all political, but thats my 2 cents
Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
about 17 years
Dave57 wrote:
sanday wrote:
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?

Yeah i don`t get that either.
 
Dave is an idiot.
 
Justify it.
 
Im not offended-u use the word idiot more than any other.. Pkus i dont think very highly of u ay.
 
I just think its an over reaction and Unnecessary. I am not alone in thinking that. I'll admit its probably equal in terms of the nz govt over reacting by disallowing a visa.
 
I already have:
 
Basically saying "It is only 1 player, so they should bend over and take it" - either trying to wind people up, or just plain stupid.
Frankie Mac2007-10-12 17:24:50
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years
RING UP RADIO SPORT AND HAVE YA SAY 0800 82 55 77
 
Ask about the double standards!
Starting XI
1
·
2.3K
·
about 17 years
martinb wrote:
So it is political interference when NZ applies its immigration rules, but not when FIFA tells us to change them especially for a Fijian soccer player?
 
Fiji kicked out our high commissioner. They are run by a military dictator. Some people there live under a curfew, and now have to retire at 55 and take a mandatory salary cut.
 
FIFA Fairplay or blatter bs?
 
I'm sure Fijians have an opinion on this, if they were allowed to...
 
sorry to go all political, but thats my 2 cents
 
NZ did not apply its immigration rules as written.
 
- The guy's family are not in the military.
- The guy is here on an international sporting event hosted by NZ.
 
According to NZ immigration rules, he can have a visa. FIFA have not asked us to change them. Where does that idea come from?
Phoenix Academy
0
·
220
·
about 17 years
Dave57 wrote:
sanday wrote:
SiNZ wrote:
Dave57 - I don't understand how anyone can blame the Fijian Football Association for complaining to FIFA? How does that work?

Yeah i don`t get that either.
 
Dave is an idiot.
 
Justify it.
 
Im not offended-u use the word idiot more than any other.. Pkus i dont think very highly of u ay.
 
I just think its an over reaction and Unnecessary. I am not alone in thinking that. I'll admit its probably equal in terms of the nz govt over reacting by disallowing a visa.
 
I already have:
 
Basically saying "It is only 1 player, so they should bend over and take it" - either trying to wind people up, or just plain stupid.
 
"I'm going to chuck in an ill-informed opinion here, but do we really think the 2nd and 3rd best keepers in fiji are much worse than the first ?

It's not like he plays in Serie A and the rest play in Fiji is it ?

They've done it to make a scene..." HARD NEWS.
 
I'm not the only one with this opinion aye.
 
 
Its not exactly what i said aye. Im saying its an over reaction and they should accept the consequences of the state of their govt and NZs stance and if not they should not go as far as to have the match cancelled and all the consequences it has. (not nz footballs fault, not the fans fault-they're unfairly impacted).
 
Frankie:its my opinion  just respect it and dont insult me. Pretty imature aye. (im allowed to be imature-im 17).
Dave572007-10-12 17:35:35
Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
about 17 years
[QUOTE=Dave57
 
"I'm going to chuck in an ill-informed opinion here, but do we really think the 2nd and 3rd best keepers in fiji are much worse than the first ?

It's not like he plays in Serie A and the rest play in Fiji is it ?

They've done it to make a scene..." HARD NEWS.
 
I'm not the only one with this opinion aye.
 
 
Its not exactly what i said aye. Im saying its an over reaction and they should accept the consequences of the state of their govt and NZs stance and if not they should not go as far as to have the match cancelled and all the consequences it has. (not nz footballs fault, not the fans fault).
 
Frankie:its my opinion  just respect it and dont insult me. Pretty imature aye. (im allowed to be imature-im 17).
[/QUOTE]
 
Hard News is an idiot as well. 
 
It's not NZ Footballs fault, its not the fans fault, its the govt's fault - I think that 90% of the people on here think that.
Frankie Mac2007-10-12 17:37:21
Phoenix Academy
0
·
220
·
about 17 years
thats good then-im glad u wont be abusing me over it.
 
u r an idiot
Dave572007-10-12 17:42:10
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
Seatts as you are around where and when could we possibly play this game? Do we have to play it in Oceania?Thanks.
WeeNix
0
·
850
·
about 17 years
i think I would call that interview on the National radio with Winnie as less than probing .... and when winnie said he had sighted a copy of the goalies' wedding certificate from 2005 it kind of ruined the interviewer's main argument.

HOWEVER - I could see NZ winning the match on Saturday and Fiji then protesting about the home side effectively being able to choose which players the opposition could field - so to kill that possibility it was necessary for FIFA to pull the plug.

and it really sucks

phoenix rising2007-10-12 17:56:55
LG
Legend
5.8K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years
Well the AB's played in the same finals as Fiji, Why were they not brought home before the tournament started?( Or even sent in the first place?) I'm disappointed Winston, no consistancy. Come to think of it, the USA & the French were also involved and politically we're not friends with them either.
Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years
I wonder what would have happened if this happened in 4 years time....(the rugby world cup in NZ)...would they have let the fijian rugby team into the country?
 
Yes...too pissed off for words!
Trialist
0
·
140
·
about 17 years
Agreed that this is sh*te

but .. what if, hypothetically...

NZ plays Indonesia in the playoff later in the piece. Turns out the Indo left back was the alchemist for the Bali bombing but didn't go to jail. We don't give him a visa. Fifa says he plays.

Hypothetically
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
I see this just as an unfortunate set of circumstance and am finding it difficult to blame anyone. The whole problem began when the Fiji games had to be rushed after Vanuatu games had to be re-scheduled, so there was little time for NZ Football, FIFA and the Government to think this through properly. FIFA are fully justified in pulling the game, as were the Fijians in asking for the same, although I would have expected FIFA to have pulled the plug quicker than it did.
As far as the Government goes, my, ahem, inside, sources state that the Fiji football team was allowed to enter on the same basis as the Fiji 7's team (the process was apparently even rushed through), ie, part of international competition that NZ was committed to, and the football players were subjected to same background checks as the 7's players. My source is insistant that the keeper is married, they've located and seen a marriage certificate and have found no evidence that the marriage has terminated in any way. The problem here is that our sanctions are unilateral so FIFA as an internatioal organisation doesn't have to abide by them.
While a lot of people are understandably angry, from the Government's point of view the rules can't really be changed now. While charges of hypocrisy on Government's part are perhaps not altogether inaccurate, the Government has to operate in the real world. In other words, when we look to uphold democratic principles away from our shores, we can flex only enough political muscle not to jeopardise our other interests, usually economic. So with China, we can whisper and make polite suggestions; with Fiji, we can be more heavy-handed. POLS 101 there.el grapadura2007-10-12 18:41:35
First Team Squad
9
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
What about an exhibition match for all us Aucklanders starved of quality football?
Phoenix Academy
0
·
220
·
about 17 years
Fijian coach stated on the news that fiji should get the points for the game-no rematch. Also confirmed that the goalie is married, he was lying about the gf thing.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up