All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

Under 17 Hotties

78 replies · 3,395 views
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Under 17 Hotties
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Hannah Wall.....Yummy

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm sure her mum and dad will be real proud when they read that.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Just throwing it out there...?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Ha, it. That's a funny name for it...
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sorry...Just throwing the hotties out there...?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Pls start a thread called A-League Hotties, or I will have to pull this for being sexualist

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oh Smarah, where art thou?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
...so, for [countless people making similar comments]'s sakes - shouldn't it be called the *OVER 16* World Cup??
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
I'm sure her mum and dad will be real proud when they read that.
 
I know Hannah's mum and I reckon she'd be well capable of opening a big can of whoop-ass if she read that!

Apparently I'm apathetic, but I couldn't care less.

"Being a Partick Thistle fan sets you apart. It means youre a free thinker. It also means your team has no money." Tim Luckhurst, The Independent, 4th December 2003

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Please remember that some forumites are of an age where this discussion is appropriate, the rest of you I am reporting to the police.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Miley Cyrus.
 
what?

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Please remember that some forumites are of an age where this discussion is appropriate, the rest of you I am reporting to the police.


So is this thread gonna become an R<17 zone?
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's complicated.

If they're 15, and you're 17 - that's ok.
 
If they're 16, and you're 45 - that's ok too.
 
BUT if you're 18, and they're 15 - apparently and allegedly not ok.
 
Yes, I am in Gisborne...hahaha
 
Again, let's imagine we've come from a medieval time-capsule.
You wouldn't be too happy with modern laws.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Masty wrote:
BUT if you're 18, and they're 15 - apparently and allegedly not ok.


I'd say it's ok. Just.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Well...anything (within reason) SHOULD be, if you (both) possess a mixture of enough self-control, descretion, honesty, and maturity.

Unfortunately, most don't.
 
I was more getting at the stupid age-related law that seems to crop up an awful lot.
 
See, why should Frankie Mac be restricted from Miley Cyrus? Totally rational proposition.
 
....
 
... ..
 
..  
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yeah that's the bit I never understand...not just with Frankie, but, in general.
 
"No harm in looking"
 
WHATEVER.
'Looking' is like, [some ridiculous hyperbolic simile that I don't have the sharpness of mind to come up with right now...]
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
This thread is all kinds of wrong.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Masty wrote:
It's complicated.
If they're 15, and you're 17 - that's ok.

�

If they're 16, and you're 45 - that's ok too.

�

BUT if you're 18, and they're 15 - apparently and allegedly not ok.

�

Yes, I am in Gisborne...hahaha

�

Again, let's imagine we've come from a medieval time-capsule.You wouldn't be too happy with modern laws.


And if you're a playboy millionaire who is 83 and they're 19 year old twins - thats ok too.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Brioney Fisher...All kinds of Hot right there...!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hmmm i can see the head lines now, YF full of peverted men......lock up your U17 girls footy teams.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I agree with Jag. I also know Hannah's parents and if they ever find out who is making the comments they will open a whole can of whip arse on you. Better still, try a "1 on 1" on the pitch with any of the ladies and they will turn you inside out. You should be ashamed!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Multilyith wrote:

Hannah Wall.....Yummy



while I don't exactly want to get involved in this... conversatio, I must commend Miss Wall on being the only member of the team to list the Phoenix under "favourite team" on the nzsoccer website. For that, she's the biggest hottie of them all.



and Re: Feverish's request for the A-League hotties - plodder ftw.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Haha whats everyone having a cry for? Hannah is a hottie! Have a little fun you old guys
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
And that concludes the defence for Michael Jackson your honour....
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
...hate to argue with myself, but wasn't he - allegedly - with (much) little(r) BOYS?
 
The (very small, if at any) issue here for me is that nobody's started a thread going..."Victoria Esson [/whoever] - WHAT a player!"
 
You know?
 
The VERY LARGE issue is, on the Sky promo - whichever 'keeper they used HAS NO GLOVES ON!!
 
Haven't seen that since Filiga Keresiano...
 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
And that concludes the defence for Michael Jackson your honour....
 
Tbf he was never found guilty.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Masty wrote:
...hate to argue with myself, but wasn't he - allegedly - with (much) little(r) BOYS?  
 
Yeah, littler - but still, schoolkid is schoolkid innit? I'm struggling to see the relevance of whether the schoolkid is a BOY or a GIRL (to retain your capitalisation).
 
I take News' comment that the hottie comments are more acceptable coming from peer age groups, but I couldn't resist posting a reference to the most famous alleged paedophile of our time - I sincerely hope there are no adults here lusting after school girls.
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
SiNZ wrote:
And that concludes the defence for Michael Jackson your honour....
 
Tbf he was never found guilty.
 
And that concludes the representation from the OJ Simpson counsel your honour....
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
SiNZ wrote:
Masty wrote:
...hate to argue with myself, but wasn't he - allegedly - with (much) little(r) BOYS?  
 
Yeah, littler - but still, schoolkid is schoolkid innit? I'm struggling to see the relevance of whether the schoolkid is a BOY or a GIRL (to retain your capitalisation).
 
I take News' comment that the hottie comments are more acceptable coming from peer age groups, but I couldn't resist posting a reference to the most famous alleged paedophile of our time - I sincerely hope there are no adults here lusting after school girls.

I'm 17 so it's all good!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

SiNZ - contextual...

But I would be far less impressed with a 17 year-old school-leaver going out to dinner with a 6 year old BOY, than a 20 year-old second-year 7th former going to parties with 15 year-old GIRLS??

I'm here for the perspectives, not an argument. 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
half your age plus 8. Up until the age of....50 id say

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

SiNZ wrote:
Masty wrote:
...hate to argue with myself, but wasn't he - allegedly -�with (much) little(r) BOYS?��

�

Yeah, littler - but still, schoolkid is schoolkid innit? I'm struggling to see the relevance of whether�the schoolkid is a�BOY or a GIRL (to retain your capitalisation).

�

I take News' comment that the hottie comments are more acceptable coming from peer age groups, but I couldn't resist posting a reference to the most famous alleged�paedophile of our time - I sincerely hope there are no adults here lusting after school girls.
I'm 17 so it's all good!


Me too!
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Masty wrote:

SiNZ - contextual...

But I would be far less impressed with a 17 year-old school-leaver going out to dinner with a 6 year old BOY, than a 20 year-old second-year 7th former going to parties with 15 year-old GIRLS??

I'm here for the perspectives, not an argument. 
 
The only thing that stood out was the capitalisation of the gender, which seemed to imply it made a difference. I have no argument with your example.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
half your age plus 8. Up until the age of....50 id say
 
Its half your age plus 7 mate
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The real hotties are the volunteers. Especially those in logistics 
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News is just being overly cautious as he doesn't want the Jnr News to think that admiring young women on the internet is perfectly alright and not at all smutty!!!

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
C-Diddy wrote:
Hard News is just being overly cautious as he doesn't want the Jnr News to think that admiring young women schoolgirls on the internet is perfectly alright and not at all smutty!!!
 
Fixed ( women <> being under 17)
Permalink Permalink
over 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Question:

Does anyone know if any of the girls at the tournament are 18?
Isn't the rule on age-grade tournaments that playrs have to be, in this case, 17, on 1 January of the year that the tournament is held in? If that's the case, it's conceivable that some of the girls at the tournament may be 18.
Permalink Permalink