All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

Vs Mexico 1st Leg Thurs 14th 9:30am SS2

1684 replies · 195,430 views
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:
Hard News wrote:
Arsenal wrote:
Midfielder wrote:

To be fair ... Oceania simply isn’t a viable confederation.....  the free entry into FIFA tournaments aside from the senior men’s WC creates the greed to keep Oceania … it should be folded into Asia …. and give Asia Five full spots ….

The sooner this happens, the better. 



Won't happen.


Why?

Heaps of reasons.

1: Money money money. Asia will not cut their pie up to suit the island teams - they just do not need more cellar dweller football teams that bring nothing but need cash. The islands get their cash now and its handed out to the fat cows - ask Temarii. They may as well flush it down the loo for all the good it does. Now do you think Asia are going to fork over the required amount to get those island teams up to a standard where by they are reasonable? Facilities, uniforms, coaching, balls, referees.... That is not going to happen under anyones watch.

2: What does OFC bring to Asia? Zip zero nada. They bring the AWs and they would sit about 12th in Asia but no more. OFC bring in no money in terms of TV rights, better football, officials. Zip, zero, nada. They certainly bring no political clout so why on gods earth would they want to inherit a confederation that is bankrupt and would block vote everything against the White man (or what would be the Asian man) not to mention is an absolute fucking dogs breakfast on every scale you could use to measure.

 

This is not going to happen in any sense of the word. Seriously, stop with the crazy talk. You know not what you are talking about.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:


I don't get why we are calling to throw Strom Roux in there who has had 4 A League games. Far more experienced footballers were down right embarrassed. McGlinchy, near the top of the medal table for A League footballers last year - ineffectual. Yes Roux might have been quicker cause he is younger but also way less experienced. What do you expect him to have done that Bertos could not have done? Durante, fringe Socceroo and now AW. Embarrassed.

The gap between our footballers and Mexican domestic footballers is massive and I believe you are kidding yourself. They played some lovely one touch football in front of our goal that we have not even a shit show of matching with even our best team out there.

I just do not get some of this 'football logic' that is being spouted as stuff that should have been done but clearly ignoring facts.


Interesting to note the difference between better, and experienced. We went with the "experienced" players, but were there other better players available, thats what is being argued. We wont know, RIcki picked his faves and they didnt cut it.

I dont think anyone is saying that we have players that match the Mexican one touch skill level JV, only you are doing that to overemphasize your point of view (as you are prone to do)

The disappointing thing for me was the way we let them come to us, it was only a matter of time till they broke through. Who knows what would have happened if we had engaged  and contested further up the field. I agree that with the views that it was hard to watch an NZ team sitting back, and that isnt the way I want to see us play. 

I can see that there is a level of concern on here from some that Ricki not get lambasted too much before the Wellingon match. I will be pleased to see him go after that. It is similar to the Nix scenario, he was past it there and is past it in this arena also. I will add my thanks for all his efforts in the previous campaigns when that thread starts, but for now, I just want his defensive ultra conservative approach gone
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:


I don't get why we are calling to throw Strom Roux in there who has had 4 A League games. Far more experienced footballers were down right embarrassed. McGlinchy, near the top of the medal table for A League footballers last year - ineffectual. Yes Roux might have been quicker cause he is younger but also way less experienced. What do you expect him to have done that Bertos could not have done? Durante, fringe Socceroo and now AW. Embarrassed.

The gap between our footballers and Mexican domestic footballers is massive and I believe you are kidding yourself. They played some lovely one touch football in front of our goal that we have not even a shit show of matching with even our best team out there.

I just do not get some of this 'football logic' that is being spouted as stuff that should have been done but clearly ignoring facts.


Interesting to note the difference between better, and experienced. We went with the "experienced" players, but were there other better players available, thats what is being argued. We wont know, RIcki picked his faves and they didnt cut it.

I dont think anyone is saying that we have players that match the Mexican one touch skill level JV, only you are doing that to overemphasize your point of view (as you are prone to do)

The disappointing thing for me was the way we let them come to us, it was only a matter of time till they broke through. Who knows what would have happened if we had engaged  and contested further up the field. I agree that with the views that it was hard to watch an NZ team sitting back, and that isnt the way I want to see us play. 

I can see that there is a level of concern on here from some that Ricki not get lambasted too much before the Wellingon match. I will be pleased to see him go after that. It is similar to the Nix scenario, he was past it there and is past it in this arena also. I will add my thanks for all his efforts in the previous campaigns when that thread starts, but for now, I just want his defensive ultra conservative approach gone

 

Well said.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Buffon II wrote:
Arsenal wrote:
Seb wrote:
Hard News wrote:
Arsenal wrote:
Midfielder wrote:

To be fair ... Oceania simply isn’t a viable confederation.....  the free entry into FIFA tournaments aside from the senior men’s WC creates the greed to keep Oceania … it should be folded into Asia …. and give Asia Five full spots ….

The sooner this happens, the better. 



Won't happen.


Why?


A mod said so. 


Could be worse. Leggy could have said so.

Problem for Oceania teams is the cost. Not so much paying for the men's national, but also having to pay for all the womens and all the age group teams to compete in the Asian Confederation. Australia receives approximately $6 mil a year from the government to help pay for these costs.

The asian World Cup qualifiers starts with most the weaker nations playing home and away qualifiers against each other. By the time pool play starts most of the weaker and poorer nations have been eliminated.

Spot on - many Pacific Island countries struggle to afford to play even in Oceania tournaments as it is.

What could work is the Oceania Confederation conducting a preliminary round of World Cup qualifying with the winner of that joining the final round of Asian qualifying. This is NZF's current preference they are communicating to FIFA I believe.

To me, this seems the most workable solution.


By the way, the Solomons don't even currently have a football association after it self-destructed last month - FIFA have stepped in and appointed an interim body headed by an Aussie and a few Oceania officials to sort out the mess and run their football until a new body is formed next year:

 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-16/fifa-takes-control-of-solomon-islands-football/5025246

October 17 - FIFA and the Oceania Football Confederation (OFC) have appointed a normalisation committee to take control of the Solomon Islands Football Federation (SIFF) after the federation's funding was put on hold whilst an investigation looks into poor accounting by the federation's administrators....

According to the OFC's General Secretary, Tai Nicholas: "For one reason or another the former administration, for the amount of activities they're involved in both internationally and domestically, weren't able to fund everything.
"The best way forward in order for football to grow in that country is to install a new administration, which was done by FIFA appointing a Normalisation Committee to run the affairs of football, and to call for new elections in a year's time."

....With funding having stopped, until the normalisation committee has put in place better administration and sorted out the accounts, Solomon Islands, which have a total population of about 500,000, may have to scale back on participation in some youth tournaments..."

Big Pete 65, Christchurch

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I wish Herbert would STFU. He sounds like a moaning bastard now. "it was me that saved NZ football", "it was me alone that got the team into the WC in SA". We have a game next week, a full international against a top side and he is acting very unprofessionally. Save all your "I did not get the recognition I deserved" bullshit to after its all over. You got Halberg coach of the year.....you were widely lauded for your WC SA effort....that was then this is now!.Write a ferkin book and spill your guts then. FFS he is sounding more and more unhinged as time goes on. What this is doing to the players head...god knows!. Ego over substance me thinks!!!!

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

hepatitis wrote:

Interesting to note the difference between better, and experienced. We went with the "experienced" players, but were there other better players available, thats what is being argued. We wont know, RIcki picked his faves and they didnt cut it.

I dont think anyone is saying that we have players that match the Mexican one touch skill level JV, only you are doing that to overemphasize your point of view (as you are prone to do)

The disappointing thing for me was the way we let them come to us, it was only a matter of time till they broke through. Who knows what would have happened if we had engaged  and contested further up the field. I agree that with the views that it was hard to watch an NZ team sitting back, and that isnt the way I want to see us play. 

I can see that there is a level of concern on here from some that Ricki not get lambasted too much before the Wellingon match. I will be pleased to see him go after that. It is similar to the Nix scenario, he was past it there and is past it in this arena also. I will add my thanks for all his efforts in the previous campaigns when that thread starts, but for now, I just want his defensive ultra conservative approach gone

 

Look I will be glad to see the back of him as well. I think there is a bus load of football folk that are queued up behind me and I know I am not first in the queue either. He has done his time but his time is over. Its disappointing its come to this in terms of results and todays press articles (where I think he embarrasses himself) but he has had some cracking moments as national coach too. They are sadly stories in the past.

 

It was hard watching it all but again, what did people expect. We push higher, they exploit the gaps in behind (as has been pointed out). It was not a good watch but then look who we are playing and what did we actually expect. This was always going to be a hiding to nothing regardless of tactics or personnel - we just got the hiding!

I think there is an opportunity for Ricki to redeem himself before he leaves (which according to todays press, it now interesting yet again) by putting out that young exciting team we want to see. There is nothing in the game so NZ will be afforded the ability to play a bit more than what we did at Azteca before it went 3-0. I think its a case of wait and see what he puts out before tossing him to the wolves. If he was a smart guy, he'd help himself and put out the team we have all talked about. If not, then he deserves all the brick bats going his way and I will happily help others lob them as well.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
austin10 wrote:

I wish Herbert would STFU. He sounds like a moaning bastard now. "it was me that saved NZ football", "it was me alone that got the team into the WC in SA". We have a game next week, a full international against a top side and he is acting very unprofessionally. Save all your "I did not get the recognition I deserved" bullshit to after its all over. You got Halberg coach of the year.....you were widely lauded for your WC SA effort....that was then this is now!.Write a ferkin book and spill your guts then. FFS he is sounding more and more unhinged as time goes on. What this is doing to the players head...god knows!. Ego over substance me thinks!!!!


Hasn't he already wrote a book? Or two maybe?
I agree though. Herbert needs to man up and take responsibility for the situation at present. Forget about the past, he got the credit he deserved, but that is the past. Right now it's about the current and future situation. Nothing else matters. Herbert needs to take the hits, acknowledge that he may have got some stuff wrong and let someone else take over. 
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

hepatitis wrote:

Interesting to note the difference between better, and experienced. We went with the "experienced" players, but were there other better players available, thats what is being argued. We wont know, RIcki picked his faves and they didnt cut it.

I dont think anyone is saying that we have players that match the Mexican one touch skill level JV, only you are doing that to overemphasize your point of view (as you are prone to do)

The disappointing thing for me was the way we let them come to us, it was only a matter of time till they broke through. Who knows what would have happened if we had engaged  and contested further up the field. I agree that with the views that it was hard to watch an NZ team sitting back, and that isnt the way I want to see us play. 

I can see that there is a level of concern on here from some that Ricki not get lambasted too much before the Wellingon match. I will be pleased to see him go after that. It is similar to the Nix scenario, he was past it there and is past it in this arena also. I will add my thanks for all his efforts in the previous campaigns when that thread starts, but for now, I just want his defensive ultra conservative approach gone

 

Look I will be glad to see the back of him as well. I think there is a bus load of football folk that are queued up behind me and I know I am not first in the queue either. He has done his time but his time is over. Its disappointing its come to this in terms of results and todays press articles (where I think he embarrasses himself) but he has had some cracking moments as national coach too. They are sadly stories in the past.

 

It was hard watching it all but again, what did people expect. We push higher, they exploit the gaps in behind (as has been pointed out). It was not a good watch but then look who we are playing and what did we actually expect. This was always going to be a hiding to nothing regardless of tactics or personnel - we just got the hiding!

I think there is an opportunity for Ricki to redeem himself before he leaves (which according to todays press, it now interesting yet again) by putting out that young exciting team we want to see. There is nothing in the game so NZ will be afforded the ability to play a bit more than what we did at Azteca before it went 3-0. I think its a case of wait and see what he puts out before tossing him to the wolves. If he was a smart guy, he'd help himself and put out the team we have all talked about. If not, then he deserves all the brick bats going his way and I will happily help others lob them as well.


Agreed
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

part time fans still defending herbert because he helped to get us undefeated. It's cringe worthy that the past two years of All Whites performances are apparently fine enough to warrant no change in the eyes of the New Zealand public. And the rugby fans comparing it with the change between robbie deans in australia "it not the coach but the players, we just don't have the talent there to ever compete with a mexico side. muh robbie deans" is what is restricting football here. Such a horrible mentality which is then enforced by the wider public who have little football knowledge. 

yung thug

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Jeff Vader wrote:
Bluemagic wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
Leggy wrote:

Your comment that we could have beaten Mexico etc shows that you have no knowledge what so ever of either football or in this case International football.


Bet you didn't think we could draw with Italy in 2010 either.


Back in your box old man.


I actually agree with Leggy on this one (I think I might be coming down with something). To say we could have beaten Mexico is very ignorant of just who was in our team and who we were up against. We could play that game again 10 times over and they would rock us 10 times again and some of those saves that Moss made, may have gone in on a different day blowing it out even more. We got absolutely destroyed and if not for the performance of Moss, it would have been a worse scoreline.

I agree to an extent but with Reid, Roux, Tuiloma, a match fit Rojas and Smeltz, and no Christie, Bertos, Durante and Lochhead we could have come close I believe. I don't believe the gap between the Mexican domestic players and our best professional talents is so big. But we needed young legs, pace and a determination to keep possession and press them. Some of this was forced in Ricki, some was his own peculiar stubborn foolishness. The end result has been a setback of the All Whites brand which should be posting better performances, just as the failure to qualify for the last Confederations Cup was. The buck stops at Ricki's door because the raw material is there to do much better.

Responding to this in an unemotive manner I don't think I can agree with most of that.

I don't get why we are calling to throw Strom Roux in there who has had 4 A League games. Far more experienced footballers were down right embarrassed. McGlinchy, near the top of the medal table for A League footballers last year - ineffectual. Yes Roux might have been quicker cause he is younger but also way less experienced. What do you expect him to have done that Bertos could not have done? Durante, fringe Socceroo and now AW. Embarrassed.

The gap between our footballers and Mexican domestic footballers is massive and I believe you are kidding yourself. They played some lovely one touch football in front of our goal that we have not even a shit show of matching with even our best team out there.

 

I just do not get some of this 'football logic' that is being spouted as stuff that should have been done but clearly ignoring facts.

Durante is a long way away from fringe socceroo on current form
And we all know we are miles away from Mexico in terms of quality. But we are certainly better than the team that played yesterday and its a pretty poor look when the whole world is watching.
People were never saying we could/would qualify because we are better.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.

For the first 30 minutes the plan he used (the right plan) worked and then we made stupid errors.  Sure there are a couple of selection questions (for me Ivan should have played in midfield and Siggy should have played ahead of plodder, and I have no idea what the story is with Fitzgerald) but for me the tactics were our only option.  The tactics were not for our defenders to fuck up, and I'm sure they were meant to have a more controlled possession when they did win it.  Unfortunaely the simple facts are that we are not that good.  As Evald sais the sudden expectation that a side who couldn't string three passes together against New Caledonia should suddenly be able to do that against Mexico is laughable.

There are a generation of people that jumped on the bandwagon in 2009 and now think that is the norm.  SInce then we have lost Nelsen, Elliot and Brown (our entire competent midfield) and were missing Reid (and to a lesser extent Payne).  The nation and a pile of johnny-come-lately football fans have delusions of adequacy about this side and the depth and quality of footballers we have available.

Last time I checked the U20 players people are advocating start achieved exactly what at the U20 world cup?  This is real football, not kids football yet people are saying that even though they were poor at the U20 world cup they would have been more competitive than the experienced players we used?

Please.


How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I was not referring to form however he has been in very good form in the A League so not sure I agree once again.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I will also add that many of those calling for Ricki's oimmediatte dismissal couldn't name his assistants let alone a viable alternative to replace him.

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

I will also add that many of those calling for Ricki's oimmediatte dismissal couldn't name his assistants let alone a viable alternative to replace him.

I think Ricki might be in for some hard news.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
threatD wrote:
Hard News wrote:

I will also add that many of those calling for Ricki's oimmediatte dismissal couldn't name his assistants let alone a viable alternative to replace him.

I think Ricki might be in for some hard news.

You know, I have a funny feeling that this is going to get very interesting come the coaching seat after Wednesday.

They don't have to announce anyone until they have a fixture and they wont have a fixture until 2015 (unless AU want a warm up game prior to WC2014) so even if Ricki was to be the man again, he may not see a pay cheque for 18 months. Why pay for a coach if you are not going to have games to play and we wont be playing at all next year.


I think if he does not get the job he thinks he should get, then there could be a major dummy spit on the way if this mornings article is anything to go by. I would not give him the job but the way he talks in the press.....

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago · edited over 12 years ago · History
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.

For the first 30 minutes the plan he used (the right plan) worked and then we made stupid errors.  Sure there are a couple of selection questions (for me Ivan should have played in midfield and Siggy should have played ahead of plodder, and I have no idea what the story is with Fitzgerald) but for me the tactics were our only option.  The tactics were not for our defenders to fuck up, and I'm sure they were meant to have a more controlled possession when they did win it.  Unfortunaely the simple facts are that we are not that good.  As Evald sais the sudden expectation that a side who couldn't string three passes together against New Caledonia should suddenly be able to do that against Mexico is laughable.

There are a generation of people that jumped on the bandwagon in 2009 and now think that is the norm.  SInce then we have lost Nelsen, Elliot and Brown (our entire competent midfield) and were missing Reid (and to a lesser extent Payne).  The nation and a pile of johnny-come-lately football fans have delusions of adequacy about this side and the depth and quality of footballers we have available.

Last time I checked the U20 players people are advocating start achieved exactly what at the U20 world cup?  This is real football, not kids football yet people are saying that even though they were poor at the U20 world cup they would have been more competitive than the experienced players we used?

Please.


Did someone actually say we should have played like Spain or are you making a leap with that one ?

Very few teams have proved able to sit that deep comfortably against a competant opposition, and last time I checked the All Whites certainly aren't in the same league as a Mourinho led Inter or di Matteo's Chelsea, so I would challenge any claim that the tactics were right. At the very least they were not right for the personnel on the field.

Your argument against the U20s seems to be based on an argument that has the entire squad fielded against Mexico at the Azteca which is clearly nonsense. What many are advocating on here is using the U20 players that are already in the All Whites squad instead of unattached players with no form.

Clearly the experience vs youth argument debate has been well and truely put to bed after yesterday's fiasco.

I will add that I'm not interested in slating individual players for their performances yesterday but that I believe the starting team itself was wrong based purely on the football (or lack of) that the players have been involved in over the past few months.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.

For the first 30 minutes the plan he used (the right plan) worked and then we made stupid errors.  Sure there are a couple of selection questions (for me Ivan should have played in midfield and Siggy should have played ahead of plodder, and I have no idea what the story is with Fitzgerald) but for me the tactics were our only option.  The tactics were not for our defenders to fuck up, and I'm sure they were meant to have a more controlled possession when they did win it.  Unfortunaely the simple facts are that we are not that good.  As Evald sais the sudden expectation that a side who couldn't string three passes together against New Caledonia should suddenly be able to do that against Mexico is laughable.

There are a generation of people that jumped on the bandwagon in 2009 and now think that is the norm.  SInce then we have lost Nelsen, Elliot and Brown (our entire competent midfield) and were missing Reid (and to a lesser extent Payne).  The nation and a pile of johnny-come-lately football fans have delusions of adequacy about this side and the depth and quality of footballers we have available.

Last time I checked the U20 players people are advocating start achieved exactly what at the U20 world cup?  This is real football, not kids football yet people are saying that even though they were poor at the U20 world cup they would have been more competitive than the experienced players we used?

Please.

So. Much. This.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.

For the first 30 minutes the plan he used (the right plan) worked and then we made stupid errors.  Sure there are a couple of selection questions (for me Ivan should have played in midfield and Siggy should have played ahead of plodder, and I have no idea what the story is with Fitzgerald) but for me the tactics were our only option.  The tactics were not for our defenders to fuck up, and I'm sure they were meant to have a more controlled possession when they did win it.  Unfortunaely the simple facts are that we are not that good.  As Evald sais the sudden expectation that a side who couldn't string three passes together against New Caledonia should suddenly be able to do that against Mexico is laughable.

There are a generation of people that jumped on the bandwagon in 2009 and now think that is the norm.  SInce then we have lost Nelsen, Elliot and Brown (our entire competent midfield) and were missing Reid (and to a lesser extent Payne).  The nation and a pile of johnny-come-lately football fans have delusions of adequacy about this side and the depth and quality of footballers we have available.

Last time I checked the U20 players people are advocating start achieved exactly what at the U20 world cup?  This is real football, not kids football yet people are saying that even though they were poor at the U20 world cup they would have been more competitive than the experienced players we used?

Please.



This
There are plenty of post WC supporters who actually don't really get how poor NZ football is or has been. Drawing against Italy in a WC is NOT the norm. IMO Roux and Tuiloma are certainly too young and inexperianced to have played at the Azteca.
However what really bugs me about the Mexico game is because of some intangible reason know only in Ricki world we chose to leave fully fledged professionals playing in reasonable leagues out of the team. Instead Ricki went back and selected amateurs from the local domestic league....including players that he dropped or would not select for the Nix(Christie, Clapham) I just don't get it....and I guess we will never know why. 
I don't think we could have got even a draw in Mexico but IMO we could have come closer with different players....and a possible 1-3 result would have given us some hope for Wellington.
I know this would never happen under Ricki but personally I would have had Fitzgerald in for Ivan at CB. Fitz is starting J league level....every week marking quick agile players(like the Mexicans). Anyone would have been better than Christie but I would have have gone for Keat as the next best option. He was coming back from injury during the warmups so was not in top form but he recovered and played the full 90 in his pro clubs last two games at the end of October. I would also have played Henderson instead of Brockie. I have watched Henderson this year....he is a good pro, starting and scoring throughout the season. IMO Brockie is not an international class player, low work rate, was invisble again in Mexico. Zero goals in 40??? games says it all. Henderson has a much better range of overall skill.
I guess what I am getting is we had experianced professional players available who may not have won us the game but they would possibly put us in a better position for the second leg.....and non of them are U20's. We did not use our limited player resources as well as we might
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
Seb wrote:
Hard News wrote:
Arsenal wrote:
Midfielder wrote:

To be fair ... Oceania simply isn’t a viable confederation.....  the free entry into FIFA tournaments aside from the senior men’s WC creates the greed to keep Oceania … it should be folded into Asia …. and give Asia Five full spots ….

The sooner this happens, the better. 



Won't happen.


Why?

Heaps of reasons.

1: Money money money. Asia will not cut their pie up to suit the island teams - they just do not need more cellar dweller football teams that bring nothing but need cash....

2: What does OFC bring to Asia? Zip zero nada. They bring the AWs and they would sit about 12th in Asia but no more. OFC bring in no money in terms of TV rights, better football, officials. Zip, zero, nada. They certainly bring no political clout so why on gods earth would they want to inherit a confederation that is bankrupt and would block vote everything against the White man (or what would be the Asian man) not to mention is an absolute fucking dogs breakfast on every scale you could use to measure.

 

This is not going to happen in any sense of the word. Seriously, stop with the crazy talk. You know not what you are talking about.

I agree with you on everything else (although if FIFA gave Asia a fifth automatic spot in the World Cup they couldn't have grounds to object to the Oceania winner joining the last round of Asian qualifying).
But I disagree with your statement the All Whites would sit about 12th in Asia - Asia's not that strong as we proved  in 2009 against their fifth best team in qualifying, Bahrain.
Here are the current top-ten ranked Asian sides in the FIFA rankings - I feel we're only worse than the top five - we'd be sixth on that list, between Australia and Jordan in terms of ability. On a good day we could give Iran and Uzbekistan a run for their money.
The UAE, although they beat us in the OSN Cup in September are beatable, as are Oman, China and the Saudis (as we proved).
In other words, there's some cause for opitimism, post these qualifiers and post Herbert.
I believe with a new manager and better player selection and tactics, the All Whites will improve a lot with the excellent talent coming through.
Asian Ranking   Country        FIFA.Rnk       Points    
1                    Japan               44                634pts
2              Iran                      49               613pts 
3            Uzbekistan          55              582pts
4                  Korea Republic    56            569pts
5                          Australia         57           564pts  
6                               Jordan      70           502pts 
7            United Arab Emirates  71           496pts
 8                                 Oman     92          381pts
9                               China P     97           365pts
10                       Saudi Arabia  101          338pts

Big Pete 65, Christchurch

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

I will also add that many of those calling for Ricki's oimmediatte dismissal couldn't name his assistants let alone a viable alternative to replace him.


Ridiculous statement.
Assistant coach: Brian Turner
Technical Adviser: Raul Blanco
Coach: Neil Emblem
Goalkeeping Coach: Clint Gosling

Potential viable options off the top of my head:
- Neil Emblem (The obvious candidate)
- Chris Greenacre/Paul Ifill (longer term options perhaps)
- Tony Readings 
I think we have to be realistic about the type of coach we can attract. There are not many quality coaches out there who would consider this job for less than 100k a year. To the guy who said Guus Hidink.. he would demand at least 800k a year. So far out of our budget that it is completely un-feasible. 
Basically we are looking at League 2/Lower league 1 quality coaches. My dream would be to see someone like Graham Alexander (840 football league appearances, 40 for Scotland, currently managing Fleetwood Town) but the likely-hood of getting a guy like this would be slim. He will probably managing a championship team in a year or two anyway.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Did someone actually say we should have played like Spain or are you making a leap with that one ?

Very few teams have proved able to sit that deep comfortably against a competant opposition, and last time I checked the All Whites certainly aren't in the same league as a Mourinho led Inter or di Matteo's Chelsea, so I would challenge any claim that the tactics were right. At the very least they were not right for the personnel on the field.

Your argument against the U20s seems to be based on an argument that has the entire squad fielded against Mexico at the Azteca which is clearly nonsense. What many are advocating on here is using the U20 players that are already in the All Whites squad instead of unattached players with no form.

Clearly the experience vs youth argument debate has been well and truely put to bed after yesterday's fiasco.

You always have a better argument (and you don't by the way) if you are not calling the kettle black.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:


I don't get why we are calling to throw Strom Roux in there who has had 4 A League games. Far more experienced footballers were down right embarrassed. McGlinchy, near the top of the medal table for A League footballers last year - ineffectual. Yes Roux might have been quicker cause he is younger but also way less experienced. What do you expect him to have done that Bertos could not have done? Durante, fringe Socceroo and now AW. Embarrassed.

The gap between our footballers and Mexican domestic footballers is massive and I believe you are kidding yourself. They played some lovely one touch football in front of our goal that we have not even a shit show of matching with even our best team out there.

I just do not get some of this 'football logic' that is being spouted as stuff that should have been done but clearly ignoring facts.


Interesting to note the difference between better, and experienced. We went with the "experienced" players, but were there other better players available, thats what is being argued. We wont know, RIcki picked his faves and they didnt cut it.

I dont think anyone is saying that we have players that match the Mexican one touch skill level JV, only you are doing that to overemphasize your point of view (as you are prone to do)

The disappointing thing for me was the way we let them come to us, it was only a matter of time till they broke through. Who knows what would have happened if we had engaged  and contested further up the field. I agree that with the views that it was hard to watch an NZ team sitting back, and that isnt the way I want to see us play. 

I can see that there is a level of concern on here from some that Ricki not get lambasted too much before the Wellingon match. I will be pleased to see him go after that. It is similar to the Nix scenario, he was past it there and is past it in this arena also. I will add my thanks for all his efforts in the previous campaigns when that thread starts, but for now, I just want his defensive ultra conservative approach gone

Agree. It was the way we lost, not the fact we did, that is harder to take. 


I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

Did someone actually say we should have played like Spain or are you making a leap with that one ?

Very few teams have proved able to sit that deep comfortably against a competant opposition, and last time I checked the All Whites certainly aren't in the same league as a Mourinho led Inter or di Matteo's Chelsea, so I would challenge any claim that the tactics were right. At the very least they were not right for the personnel on the field.

Your argument against the U20s seems to be based on an argument that has the entire squad fielded against Mexico at the Azteca which is clearly nonsense. What many are advocating on here is using the U20 players that are already in the All Whites squad instead of unattached players with no form.

Clearly the experience vs youth argument debate has been well and truely put to bed after yesterday's fiasco.

You always have a better argument (and you don't by the way) if you are not calling the kettle black.

So you would still back Lochhead and Christies inclusion in the squad yesterday based on nothing more than 'they've played some big games in the past' ?

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Big Pete 65 wrote:

I agree with you on everything else (although if FIFA gave Asia a fifth automatic spot in the World Cup they couldn't have grounds to object to the Oceania winner joining the last round of Asian qualifying).

But I disagree with your statement the All Whites would sit about 12th in Asia - Asia's not that strong as we proved  in 2009 against their fifth best team in qualifying, Bahrain.

To be fair to your point, I was taking a guess and my mental maths was off. Thank you for correcting me. I was thinking 4 automatic spots plus we would be in the next 6 for the play offs but that's wrong. Agree we would be higher.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.



Nice piece of exaggeration
It is way more complex, and going back to the whole selection and preparation of the side.
Sacked, probably not
Contract not renewed, yes


Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Seb wrote:
Hard News wrote:

I will also add that many of those calling for Ricki's oimmediatte dismissal couldn't name his assistants let alone a viable alternative to replace him.


Ridiculous statement.

MANAGER: Brian Turner

Technical Adviser: Raul Blanco

ASSISTANT COACH: Neil Emblem

Goalkeeping Coach: Clint Gosling


Potential viable options off the top of my head:

- Neil Emblem (The obvious candidate)

- Chris Greenacre/Paul Ifill (longer term options perhaps)

- Tony Readings 

 

Wow. He is right, you have no idea whom the coaches are.

Also Emblen is not an option and Greenacre is not ready yet.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
 Also Emblen is not an option

What? Yes he is.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

Did someone actually say we should have played like Spain or are you making a leap with that one ?

Very few teams have proved able to sit that deep comfortably against a competant opposition, and last time I checked the All Whites certainly aren't in the same league as a Mourinho led Inter or di Matteo's Chelsea, so I would challenge any claim that the tactics were right. At the very least they were not right for the personnel on the field.

Your argument against the U20s seems to be based on an argument that has the entire squad fielded against Mexico at the Azteca which is clearly nonsense. What many are advocating on here is using the U20 players that are already in the All Whites squad instead of unattached players with no form.

Clearly the experience vs youth argument debate has been well and truely put to bed after yesterday's fiasco.

You always have a better argument (and you don't by the way) if you are not calling the kettle black.

So you would still back Lochhead and Christies inclusion in the squad yesterday based on nothing more than 'they've played some big games in the past' ?

You seem to think that the experience vs youth debate is dead with nothing to measure it against. You have zero proof that Tuiloma would have done a better job. Again, name a better LB than Tony Lochhead? Please. I want you to. Substantiate your claim. Hence why I said, you can't call out others for making a leap when you do exactly the same.

Christie, well no one is really defending that choice regardless of what measure you throw at it but you are not naming a youth footballer to replace him now are you, just a shuffling of the deck chairs. Ivan, James perhaps? Not exactly youth footballers.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
austin10 wrote:
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.

For the first 30 minutes the plan he used (the right plan) worked and then we made stupid errors.  Sure there are a couple of selection questions (for me Ivan should have played in midfield and Siggy should have played ahead of plodder, and I have no idea what the story is with Fitzgerald) but for me the tactics were our only option.  The tactics were not for our defenders to fuck up, and I'm sure they were meant to have a more controlled possession when they did win it.  Unfortunaely the simple facts are that we are not that good.  As Evald sais the sudden expectation that a side who couldn't string three passes together against New Caledonia should suddenly be able to do that against Mexico is laughable.

There are a generation of people that jumped on the bandwagon in 2009 and now think that is the norm.  SInce then we have lost Nelsen, Elliot and Brown (our entire competent midfield) and were missing Reid (and to a lesser extent Payne).  The nation and a pile of johnny-come-lately football fans have delusions of adequacy about this side and the depth and quality of footballers we have available.

Last time I checked the U20 players people are advocating start achieved exactly what at the U20 world cup?  This is real football, not kids football yet people are saying that even though they were poor at the U20 world cup they would have been more competitive than the experienced players we used?

Please.



This

There are plenty of post WC supporters who actually don't really get how poor NZ football is or has been. Drawing against Italy in a WC is NOT the norm. IMO Roux and Tuiloma are certainly too young and inexperianced to have played at the Azteca.

However what really bugs me about the Mexico game is because of some intangible reason know only in Ricki world we chose to leave fully fledged professionals playing in reasonable leagues out of the team. Instead Ricki went back and selected amateurs from the local domestic league....including players that he dropped or would not select for the Nix(Christie, Clapham) I just don't get it....and I guess we will never know why. 

I don't think we could have got even a draw in Mexico but IMO we could have come closer with different players....and a possible 1-3 result would have given us some hope for Wellington.

I know this would never happen under Ricki but personally I would have had Fitzgerald in for Ivan at CB. Fitz is starting J league level....every week marking quick agile players(like the Mexicans). Anyone would have been better than Christie but I would have have gone for Keat as the next best option. He was coming back from injury during the warmups so was not in top form but he recovered and played the full 90 in his pro clubs last two games at the end of October. I would also have played Henderson instead of Brockie. I have watched Henderson this year....he is a good pro, starting and scoring throughout the season. IMO Brockie is not an international class player, low work rate, was invisble again in Mexico. Zero goals in 40??? games says it all. Henderson has a much better range of overall skill.

I guess what I am getting is we had experianced professional players available who may not have won us the game but they would possibly put us in a better position for the second leg.....and non of them are U20's. We did not use our limited player resources as well as we might

Good post.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
 Also Emblen is not an option


What? Yes he is.

No ... if someone on this board says he's not an option then that rules him out

:))

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.



Nice piece of exaggeration
It is way more complex, and going back to the whole selection and preparation of the side.
Sacked, probably not
Contract not renewed, yes


I'm not sure what point you are arguing Hep. No one is saying his contract should be renewed...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


Another thought - how much blame does Ricki shoulder for the OFCNC debacle? All this talk about our poor preparation and lack of meaningful games wouldn't be happening if we'd played in the Confederations Cup. We could spend months on hypotheticals but surely 3 matches against top quality sides would have helped our preparation no end. Why didn't we play them? Because we lost to New Caledonia in a tournament where our most experienced striker was playing defensive mid for the first time in his life

 

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.



Nice piece of exaggeration
It is way more complex, and going back to the whole selection and preparation of the side.
Sacked, probably not
Contract not renewed, yes



The arguments are not that at all. Your argument seems to be we would always lose, so who cares how it happened?
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
 Also Emblen is not an option


What? Yes he is.

No ... if someone on this board says he's not an option then that rules him out

:))

Emblen has not got the coaching tickets. Even he would be very surprised to get the job. quote unquote. That's not me saying that, that's someone whom is very very close to him repeating that.

 

I want him to get the job. I think he would be good at it so I am not saying 'he is not an option' for the sake of it. I just happen to have some skinny that I could name a source on in about 2 weeks.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

I've heard a name too JV.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
hepatitis wrote:
Hard News wrote:

I have yet to see anyone saying it's not time for a change. 

The arguments seem to be that Ricki should be sacked for not playing the U20 squad and not playing like Spain - at altitude in front of 100000 against a side who are light years better than us. Us 'part time fans' don't think that is a fair assessment.



Nice piece of exaggeration
It is way more complex, and going back to the whole selection and preparation of the side.
Sacked, probably not
Contract not renewed, yes


I'm not sure what point you are arguing Hep. No one is saying his contract should be renewed...

He is arguing that people are saying Ricki should be sacked cos we didn't play like Spain. 
I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Another thought - how much blame does Ricki shoulder for the OFCNC debacle? All this talk about our poor preparation and lack of meaningful games wouldn't be happening if we'd played in the Confederations Cup. We could spend months on hypotheticals but surely 3 matches against top quality sides would have helped our preparation no end. Why didn't we play them? Because we lost to New Caledonia in a tournament where our most experienced striker was playing defensive mid for the first time in his life

This is a large part of it and the review said as much as well. Paraphrasing, the review said something like 'the tournament was not taken seriously'. There is only one man that runs the show up there and that's the coach so in my mind, he is 100% complicit.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

hepatitis wrote:

Interesting to note the difference between better, and experienced. We went with the "experienced" players, but were there other better players available, thats what is being argued. We wont know, RIcki picked his faves and they didnt cut it.

I dont think anyone is saying that we have players that match the Mexican one touch skill level JV, only you are doing that to overemphasize your point of view (as you are prone to do)

The disappointing thing for me was the way we let them come to us, it was only a matter of time till they broke through. Who knows what would have happened if we had engaged  and contested further up the field. I agree that with the views that it was hard to watch an NZ team sitting back, and that isnt the way I want to see us play. 

I can see that there is a level of concern on here from some that Ricki not get lambasted too much before the Wellingon match. I will be pleased to see him go after that. It is similar to the Nix scenario, he was past it there and is past it in this arena also. I will add my thanks for all his efforts in the previous campaigns when that thread starts, but for now, I just want his defensive ultra conservative approach gone

 

Look I will be glad to see the back of him as well. I think there is a bus load of football folk that are queued up behind me and I know I am not first in the queue either. He has done his time but his time is over. Its disappointing its come to this in terms of results and todays press articles (where I think he embarrasses himself) but he has had some cracking moments as national coach too. They are sadly stories in the past.

 

It was hard watching it all but again, what did people expect. We push higher, they exploit the gaps in behind (as has been pointed out). It was not a good watch but then look who we are playing and what did we actually expect. This was always going to be a hiding to nothing regardless of tactics or personnel - we just got the hiding!

I think there is an opportunity for Ricki to redeem himself before he leaves (which according to todays press, it now interesting yet again) by putting out that young exciting team we want to see. There is nothing in the game so NZ will be afforded the ability to play a bit more than what we did at Azteca before it went 3-0. I think its a case of wait and see what he puts out before tossing him to the wolves. If he was a smart guy, he'd help himself and put out the team we have all talked about. If not, then he deserves all the brick bats going his way and I will happily help others lob them as well.

I have to disagree JV. We've had reasonable results against other teams from that region who have not been overwhelmed by Mexico. There isn't the canyon between us and Mexico if we play to our strengths and select players on skill and not familiarity. We were undone by a better team, putting out some key "experienced" oldies who lacked match fitness or the legs and a non-playing key midfielder, sitting back and letting the Mexican's come at us and then just hoofing the ball back to them if we got it. We could have played much better than that first half display. I'm not saying we could have beaten them in that environment but with the right players we could have pressed them, we could have tried to play possession football. We could push them back as we proved near the end with a bit of ball control. We could even score. Our target should have been 1-2 to 2-4 and that was achievable with the players available. Then we're still in it for Wellington. Most importantly we should only have put out match fit professional players who could play for 90 minutes in very testing circumstances. We did not and paid the price.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

They played shit and they are shit managed, everything has to be questioned.

Watch the Germany vs Faroer Island this september. Faroer (Population 59.000) tried hard, almost made a goal in the first minute, gave everything they had, no defensive tactics, realistic tactics. At the end they lost 3:0, but against a well oiled team, maybe the best in world, not mexico. And don't think Germany would not have butchered them. They got respect for their performance.

I want to see the same thing on Wednesday from our team, no stupid excuses.

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago

Oh well Ricki can be defended for being ultra-conservative in the 1st leg, but not 2nd. Will be interesting how we approach it.

I like tautologies because I like them.
Permalink Permalink