Its no longer a problem.
All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams
World Cup Squad Discussion
983 replies
·
21,546 views
With it being a generation later than 82 does anyone have stats on players who parents were born overseas?
Permalink
Permalink
Just to clarify. I don't actually care where the players were born. Just interested. Hell, I was born in England and I'm as Kiwi as it comes.Toffeeman2010-05-14 20:36:51
Its no longer a problem.
Permalink
Permalink
I find it interesting that theres been a lot of debate about Moss going and not much about Tommy Smith.Whilst he will no doubt strengthen the team, I have trouble considering him a Kiwi. He was born in England, emigrated to NZ stayed about 5 years then went back to England and played for English rep teams� - hardly the move of someone who considers himself a Kiwi. I know he meets the "official"� criteria but I can'thelp but think that he realises he'll never play for England so NZ is a good second choice.And yeah I know that the 82 team was full of similar stories, but we have progressed since then....
Know what you are saying, but if it was you, I bet you would make the same move, I know I would
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
Permalink
Permalink
Awww come on, the reason why FIFA voted to change the rules was because there was a large difference between the top countries hogging the best players and the rest.
The African countries felt that they had no access to players that had played with top countries in the age group internationals and but never was going to be in that country's national team. Hence there were amazing group of players that are capable of playing internationals with their country but will never get the chance. Because as young players, they were unable to represent their home country because there are lack of football system to progress in (in their home countries) and also being immature players not having the mind of mature adult to make decision.
They were also prone to club influences and other dynamics in the top countries football system that they would never have got at their home country and they need to have grab chances for their own professional development and for their future careers.
There should be no shame for desiring that career promotion but at the same time, they should not be punished for bettering themselves in the professional environment of football and taking advantage of what is offered in the top footballing countries.
Don't get caught up with the so called morals of eligibility, these players all want to play at the highest levels that they can be.
Once a player has played for the national team of a country, he is stuck playing for that country for life and that is a good enough commitment and passion involved in that decision because it is no means a light decision.
The African countries felt that they had no access to players that had played with top countries in the age group internationals and but never was going to be in that country's national team. Hence there were amazing group of players that are capable of playing internationals with their country but will never get the chance. Because as young players, they were unable to represent their home country because there are lack of football system to progress in (in their home countries) and also being immature players not having the mind of mature adult to make decision.
They were also prone to club influences and other dynamics in the top countries football system that they would never have got at their home country and they need to have grab chances for their own professional development and for their future careers.
There should be no shame for desiring that career promotion but at the same time, they should not be punished for bettering themselves in the professional environment of football and taking advantage of what is offered in the top footballing countries.
Don't get caught up with the so called morals of eligibility, these players all want to play at the highest levels that they can be.
Once a player has played for the national team of a country, he is stuck playing for that country for life and that is a good enough commitment and passion involved in that decision because it is no means a light decision.
Permalink
Permalink
You make some good points but i think that what you are doing is likening international football to club football.
Club football is all about mercenaries changing teams for the $$$ and in the process not showing loyalty to anyone. Ideally international football should be different. You are either a Kiwi or you aren't, you shouldn't be able to switch allegiance to a country easily. I know there is residency rule (5 years is it?) but that really isnt very long. Further there are many who quite naturally have allegiance to more than one country. I'd feel okay about Tommy Smith had he not gone back and played for Englands age teams.....
Timmy Cahill played for Samoa as a boy and is now Australias best player - he shouldn't be penalised for doing what any other young kid would have done. BUt after that he chose Australia and stuck with it. Tommy Smith is trying to play it both ways...
Having said all that, I don't blame Ricki for picking him and I will certainly cheer him on!
Club football is all about mercenaries changing teams for the $$$ and in the process not showing loyalty to anyone. Ideally international football should be different. You are either a Kiwi or you aren't, you shouldn't be able to switch allegiance to a country easily. I know there is residency rule (5 years is it?) but that really isnt very long. Further there are many who quite naturally have allegiance to more than one country. I'd feel okay about Tommy Smith had he not gone back and played for Englands age teams.....
Timmy Cahill played for Samoa as a boy and is now Australias best player - he shouldn't be penalised for doing what any other young kid would have done. BUt after that he chose Australia and stuck with it. Tommy Smith is trying to play it both ways...
Having said all that, I don't blame Ricki for picking him and I will certainly cheer him on!
Permalink
Permalink
if Tommy Smith had not been a good footballer he probably would have still be living in NZ. His family emigrated to NZ. The fact that he went back to the UK was because he was spotted for his football talent. He was scouted and offered a trial which turned into a contract.
He was then good enough to be offered a place playing for England youth. He was elligible because he was born there. What the hell was he suppose to do. At that stage there was no real professional football teams in NZ. There was no A-League. Was he meant to say " no sorry, I have a hunch that one day football in NZ will take off and I would rather wait because one day NZ will qualify for the WC"
If you were 17 and someone offers you an English international cap what the hell would you do? If he had not gone to England but had played for the Knights would that have made any difference?
There have been a number of interconnecting circumstances that have led Tommy Smith to where he is now. I am pleased he is playing for the AW's. Reid and Smith will be the backbone of the AW's defense long after Nelsen and Vicilich have gone. I don't think we can question his motivations or loyalty.
Permalink
Permalink
^^^excellent post

rojas, so special
Permalink
Permalink
Good to get some common sense on this Zinidane. I support them all, they qualify, they commit, I will shout their name out loud
Permalink
Permalink
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/world-cup/all-whites/3703321/Wynton-Rufer-blasts-All-Whites-Cup-snubs
saw this article on the front page. So is Wynton right? has anyone seen these players in action that have missed out? If they are indeed good then it is a real shame. Especially since I thought Ricki was looking for more "lost" kiwis.
saw this article on the front page. So is Wynton right? has anyone seen these players in action that have missed out? If they are indeed good then it is a real shame. Especially since I thought Ricki was looking for more "lost" kiwis.
Permalink
Permalink
It's a beat up.
Yes they are vaguely on the books of professional clubs but they are nowhere near the first team. A number of them are known to NZ football as they have played youth for NZ but some of them are only 17 years old. Maybe in the future but not this time around.
Also, despite the impression the article gives many of them haver spent a week at WYNRS which seems to be enough for Wynton to claim them as his discoveries.
Yes they are vaguely on the books of professional clubs but they are nowhere near the first team. A number of them are known to NZ football as they have played youth for NZ but some of them are only 17 years old. Maybe in the future but not this time around.
Also, despite the impression the article gives many of them haver spent a week at WYNRS which seems to be enough for Wynton to claim them as his discoveries.
Permalink
Permalink
Seems like Wynton being Wynton.
What makes him think that NZF/Ricki isn't aware of them, he is more likely of the opinion that they aren't yet ready.
Milne - On the books at Rangers - no game time
Marinovic - 2 matches this season for a side in the German 3rd league
Fitzgerald - appears to be on loan to their feeder side in the third tier of the Japanese league system
God forbid we pick someone playing in New Zealand over some of these guys who are obviously dominating the big leagues. (Not knocking them, i'm sure they all have the potential to be very good players, and represent NZ in the future, knocking the sense of cultural cringe that Wynton seems to have that training and playing in lower tier leagues overseas automatically means you are more deserving than a local player.)
What makes him think that NZF/Ricki isn't aware of them, he is more likely of the opinion that they aren't yet ready.
Milne - On the books at Rangers - no game time
Marinovic - 2 matches this season for a side in the German 3rd league
Fitzgerald - appears to be on loan to their feeder side in the third tier of the Japanese league system
God forbid we pick someone playing in New Zealand over some of these guys who are obviously dominating the big leagues. (Not knocking them, i'm sure they all have the potential to be very good players, and represent NZ in the future, knocking the sense of cultural cringe that Wynton seems to have that training and playing in lower tier leagues overseas automatically means you are more deserving than a local player.)
Permalink
Permalink
I knew you guys would know. 
so who are the other 4 names on his list? There weren't mentioned in the article. And wasn't Chris Wood always going to make the squad so what was he doing on his list?

so who are the other 4 names on his list? There weren't mentioned in the article. And wasn't Chris Wood always going to make the squad so what was he doing on his list?
Permalink
Permalink
It's funny when I started reading I thought he was gonna start talking about Oughton or James, then I read those names and thought who???? I thought there had to be some reason why they weren't picked and coming on here explained why...
I'm loving all this attention the AW's are getting, any media is good media IMO.
I'm loving all this attention the AW's are getting, any media is good media IMO.
Permalink
Permalink
Yeah... I have a lot of respect for Wynton, but he may have a personal interest or two in promoting the players. Pretty poor journalism not pointing out the crossover between the names mentioned and those from his academy. Or perhaps asking if a family member is on the submitted list.
http://www.wynrs.co.nz/Players/internationalplayers.html
With due respect to his views - there is certainly some promising talent - but those players have a chance to put their hand up and push on in future qualifying efforts, without Ricki culling a nearly a third of the team on Rufer's say so.
I'm not surprised by Ricki not replying to Rufer. He's at the pointy end of a bloody WC campaign and, frankly, Rufer simply comes across as an aggressive and whinging player agent.*KR*2010-05-16 15:34:16
http://www.wynrs.co.nz/Players/internationalplayers.html
With due respect to his views - there is certainly some promising talent - but those players have a chance to put their hand up and push on in future qualifying efforts, without Ricki culling a nearly a third of the team on Rufer's say so.
I'm not surprised by Ricki not replying to Rufer. He's at the pointy end of a bloody WC campaign and, frankly, Rufer simply comes across as an aggressive and whinging player agent.*KR*2010-05-16 15:34:16
Permalink
Permalink
I don't think that the names he mentioned deserved a look in, however, after the WC and in future campaigns maybe then they can be looked at.
I suspect a couple NZ retirements after the WC, namely Elliott and Vicelich (again).
By all account the young goalkeeper mentioned is pretty good from what i heard and read previously... however this is an area of realative strength.
Permalink
Permalink
Wynton Rufer + Sunday News = Trainwreck!!

Permalink
Permalink
Not a fan of Wynton post playing days. He still wants recognition for his career and hes never afraid to talk about himself. And because of his career he thinks Ricki has to listen to him. Hes not on the coaching staff so his opinions on the squad should mean nothing to Ricki. This article comes across as Wynton winging again. A joke just like Wynrs.
Permalink
Permalink
HN can you give us a profile on those unknowns? Milne and Wood are the only names i recognise..
ive got a song that wont take long, Adelaide are rubbish.. the second verse is same as the first.. ADELAIDE ARE RUBBISH
Permalink
Permalink
Mironivic played for Waitak a season or 2 ago if I'm not mistaken.
Permalink
Permalink
Thie is a blatant Wynrs marketing exercise, and also attention-seeking. All 4 named players named in the article are ex-Wynrs, so it is safe to assume all 7 players in Wynton's list are ex-Wynrs. Chris Wood has been included in the list - not because he is contracted to a club in the Championship, and has impressed in games for the All Whites - but because he is an ex-Wynrs player.
The named players include:
An 18 year-old who played for NZ in the FIFA U17 World Cup last year - probably well-known to NZF coaches (incl Ricki) and not up to World Cup selection at this stage in his career
A 19 year-old playing 3rd tier in Germany, and as a goalkeeper - a position where experience counts
A player in Japan who has just been loaned out to a 4th division team.
The named players include:
An 18 year-old who played for NZ in the FIFA U17 World Cup last year - probably well-known to NZF coaches (incl Ricki) and not up to World Cup selection at this stage in his career
A 19 year-old playing 3rd tier in Germany, and as a goalkeeper - a position where experience counts
A player in Japan who has just been loaned out to a 4th division team.
Permalink
Permalink
WYNRS, always thought it was pronounced 'Whiners'.
Learn something everyday... Good info btw (Seatts, Mike)
Learn something everyday... Good info btw (Seatts, Mike)
Permalink
Permalink
"Wyntons list"....politics I suspect just like Brian Turners go last week..let the football begin.
A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen
Permalink
Permalink
By all account the young goalkeeper mentioned is pretty good from what i heard and read previously... however this is an area of realative strength.
Really ?
We have a competiton for number three which goes to the person least not good enough, and take a player who can only play one match. I'd say it's one of our biggest problem areas.
Hopefully this lad escapes the Rufer shadow and with Jake Gleeson improves to be genuine international quality keepers.
Permalink
Permalink
I was about to talk to Rufer today when a message came through that Herbert had called and wanted Rufer to return his call straight away. He didn't look happy and when he shook my hand it was the firmest handshake I've ever received (not quite painful, but not far off). Possibly to do with this?
Permalink
Permalink
I meant in terms of talent News,
Paston (32 still reasonably young for a goalie)
Moss
Gleeson
Spoons
all three are young and talented, plus with have that Turipa from the U17's who kept Alex Carr on the bench. A decent amount of talent in this area.
Permalink
Permalink
Relative to New Zealands keeping depth, but not relevant to say Australia as an example.
I love Pasty and Moss, Jimbo has his moments as does Spoons but none of them would make Australias top 20 keepers and that has to be a concern.
Hopefully Gleeson or Marinovic or others (jury out on Turipa so far here in Wellington) make the step-up and raise that bar some. Apart from Nutting at his best we haven't had a keeper good enough to play at a reasonable level for 20-25 years.
I love Pasty and Moss, Jimbo has his moments as does Spoons but none of them would make Australias top 20 keepers and that has to be a concern.
Hopefully Gleeson or Marinovic or others (jury out on Turipa so far here in Wellington) make the step-up and raise that bar some. Apart from Nutting at his best we haven't had a keeper good enough to play at a reasonable level for 20-25 years.
Permalink
Permalink
I meant in terms of talent News,
�
Paston (32 still reasonably young for a goalie)
Moss
Gleeson
Spoons
�
all three are young and talented, plus with have that Turipa from the U17's who kept Alex Carr on the bench. A decent amount of talent in this area.
Paston will turn 34 this year.
Permalink
Permalink
With the squad discussion, Duncan Oughtoun is a very harsh omission. As far as the cup goes, i'd love to see McGlinchey start, he had a whale of a season at CCM and by all accounts did well in his loan at Motherwell. Also made a huge impact when coming on versus Mexico.
Permalink
Permalink
Can't have done that well at Motherwell, barely got a game and 1 start only to be pulled at half time.
Permalink
Permalink
I was about to talk to Rufer today when a message came through that Herbert had called and wanted Rufer to return his call straight away.� He didn't look happy and when he shook my hand it was the firmest handshake I've ever received (not quite painful, but not far off).� Possibly to do with this?
Uh Oh. Another please explain situation
Permalink
Permalink
[QUOTE=Hard News]Relative to New Zealands keeping depth, but not relevant to say Australia as an example.
I love Pasty and Moss, Jimbo has his moments as does Spoons but none of them would make Australias top 20 keepers and that has to be a concern.
Wow, surely that has to be an exaggeration!!
I love Pasty and Moss, Jimbo has his moments as does Spoons but none of them would make Australias top 20 keepers and that has to be a concern.
Wow, surely that has to be an exaggeration!!
Permalink
Permalink
I started with 10, then realised I could name 10 and I don't know all the Aus keepers out there so went to twenty.
Permalink
Permalink
Simon Plumb is nothing but a troll. Remember him trying to start a war between the Nix and the FFA over finals revenue? Now he's trying to set Wynton against Ricki. Who will he troll up next? Tell Sepp Blatter that John Terry slept with his wife?
Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads
Permalink
Permalink
You're assuming that one isn't true.
Back on keepers, here is a two minute brain dump:
Popular Opinion would say these would be as good or almost certainly better:
Bouzanis
Federici
Bosnich
Schwartzer
Covic
Petkovic
Petkovic
Vukovich
Theoklitos
Galekovic
Velaphi
Bolton
Jones
Kalac
Reddy
Possible (I don't rate him)
Van Stratten
Now, assuming there are a couple more young Aussies in Europe, twenty wouldn't be hard to get to.
Hard News2010-05-16 22:38:54
Back on keepers, here is a two minute brain dump:
Popular Opinion would say these would be as good or almost certainly better:
Bouzanis
Federici
Bosnich
Schwartzer
Covic
Petkovic
Petkovic
Vukovich
Theoklitos
Galekovic
Velaphi
Bolton
Jones
Kalac
Reddy
Possible (I don't rate him)
Van Stratten
Now, assuming there are a couple more young Aussies in Europe, twenty wouldn't be hard to get to.
Hard News2010-05-16 22:38:54
Permalink
Permalink
Sorry, are all these keepers better than our top keeper or our reserve keeper?
And is Galekovic good enough for a double mention or are there two of them?
loyalgunner2010-05-16 22:39:35
And is Galekovic good enough for a double mention or are there two of them?
loyalgunner2010-05-16 22:39:35
Permalink
Permalink
One Galekovic is a typo, two Petkovic's. Brothers.
Permalink
Permalink
OK. Fair enough list, too, though don't know if I'd agree that Velaphi is better than Paston or even an in form Moss for that matter.
Permalink
Permalink
Can't have done that well at Motherwell, barely got a game and 1 start only to be pulled at half time.
Pretty well. 7 appearances as sub and one start. For a team that will be playing in the Europa League. Better than being an unattached 35 year old!
Permalink
Permalink
OK. Fair enough list, too, though don't know if I'd agree that Velaphi is better than Paston or even an in form Moss for that matter.
Forgot Langerak.
Permalink
Permalink
