Trialist
0
·
7
·
almost 9 years

Sunseeker wrote:

Thanks for pointing out the reason he played. Presume that was also why the 23 year old played too?

Agree, they were far better and as I said, exploited what appears to be a formation that is not working for Suburbs. Having two Senior league players on a pitch full of 16 and 17 year olds must surely have some influence on a game and the way the team plays? I am not arguing that they should not do it as the rules allow it, I just prefer to see promising youth players get game time in a very short league, over senior Stirling Sports Premiership players.

I've been around youth league teams for several seasons now and it certainly makes a big difference having 3 senior league players in a team. Particularly if they are down the middle of the park. It's certainly not the first time Marc Evans has played youth league, and while, as you say the teams are entitled to do it, I think NZF has to decide whether it's a youth development league or a reserve competition for bringing players back from injury, giving fringe players game time etc
Starting XI
890
·
2.5K
·
about 12 years

Just a quick question.

Is the rule up to 3 or is it 2?  I have seen conflicting reports.  I imagine it's 3 as that would be a pretty easy pickup from NZF if it was 2 and someone played 3.

Marquee
260
·
5K
·
almost 17 years

I think the rule is two SS Premiership players can come down. Hence why players young enough e.g Clayton Lewis, Sarpreet Singh are registered as youth players. Because if they come down it doesn't count as one of the two.

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

chopah wrote:

Just a quick question.

Is the rule up to 3 or is it 2?  I have seen conflicting reports.  I imagine it's 3 as that would be a pretty easy pickup from NZF if it was 2 and someone played 3.

It's 3 - its in the regulations Here

Starting XI
890
·
2.5K
·
about 12 years

chopah wrote:

Just a quick question.

Is the rule up to 3 or is it 2?  I have seen conflicting reports.  I imagine it's 3 as that would be a pretty easy pickup from NZF if it was 2 and someone played 3.

It's 3 - its in the regulations Here

thanks - I had a look at that but i must be reading the wrong place or reading it wrong?

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

So did ladder front runners Hamilton play their 2 senior players in the 7-1 loss to Team Welly today? 

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

chopah wrote:

chopah wrote:

Just a quick question.

Is the rule up to 3 or is it 2?  I have seen conflicting reports.  I imagine it's 3 as that would be a pretty easy pickup from NZF if it was 2 and someone played 3.

It's 3 - its in the regulations Here

thanks - I had a look at that but i must be reading the wrong place or reading it wrong?

18.4 

The NMYL Named Squad Players shall be made up of either: 

18.4.1 All Youth Players; or 

18.4.2 A combination of Youth Players and Non-Citizen Youth Players provided that the maximum number of Non-Citizen Youth Players is three (3).

I read this part - so I read it that teams are allowed 3 over age (or non-citizen youth players) but only 2 who are National league players. Hence as Luis Garcia says why players such as Clayton Lewis and Sarpreet Singh are listed as NYL players rather than NL

Starting XI
890
·
2.5K
·
about 12 years

chopah wrote:

chopah wrote:

Just a quick question.

Is the rule up to 3 or is it 2?  I have seen conflicting reports.  I imagine it's 3 as that would be a pretty easy pickup from NZF if it was 2 and someone played 3.

It's 3 - its in the regulations Here

thanks - I had a look at that but i must be reading the wrong place or reading it wrong?

18.4 

The NMYL Named Squad Players shall be made up of either: 

18.4.1 All Youth Players; or 

18.4.2 A combination of Youth Players and Non-Citizen Youth Players provided that the maximum number of Non-Citizen Youth Players is three (3).

I read this part - so I read it that teams are allowed 3 over age (or non-citizen youth players) but only 2 who are National league players. Hence as Luis Garcia says why players such as Clayton Lewis and Sarpreet Singh are listed as NYL players rather than NL

i took 18.4.2 as meaning you can only have three players in your playing squad that are not kiwi youth players?  

then 18.7 as saying you have up to 2 overage players from your NL squad.

Accepting that of course you can name players who are normally in the NL squad in your NYL squad which then don't count as overage players if you play them down.

For a real example does anyone know who the three Hamilton played last week were?  One was the welsh striker, the other two?

Phoenix Academy
130
·
440
·
over 16 years

D Wyndust ( spelling?) was another. I was told he played against an elder son of a spectator some years back and is the same age as their son(23 - I think).

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

chopah wrote:

chopah wrote:

chopah wrote:

Just a quick question.

Is the rule up to 3 or is it 2?  I have seen conflicting reports.  I imagine it's 3 as that would be a pretty easy pickup from NZF if it was 2 and someone played 3.

It's 3 - its in the regulations Here

thanks - I had a look at that but i must be reading the wrong place or reading it wrong?

18.4 

The NMYL Named Squad Players shall be made up of either: 

18.4.1 All Youth Players; or 

18.4.2 A combination of Youth Players and Non-Citizen Youth Players provided that the maximum number of Non-Citizen Youth Players is three (3).

I read this part - so I read it that teams are allowed 3 over age (or non-citizen youth players) but only 2 who are National league players. Hence as Luis Garcia says why players such as Clayton Lewis and Sarpreet Singh are listed as NYL players rather than NL

i took 18.4.2 as meaning you can only have three players in your playing squad that are not kiwi youth players?  

then 18.7 as saying you have up to 2 overage players from your NL squad.

Accepting that of course you can name players who are normally in the NL squad in your NYL squad which then don't count as overage players if you play them down.

For a real example does anyone know who the three Hamilton played last week were?  One was the welsh striker, the other two?

Yes you are right I misread the definition of non-citizen youth players

I'm sure the number used to be 3 as am fairly sure Nelson Falcons had 3 when they won the league 2 seasons ago. Which may be where the confusion comes from

Starting XI
890
·
2.5K
·
about 12 years

chopah wrote:

chopah wrote:

chopah wrote:

Just a quick question.

Is the rule up to 3 or is it 2?  I have seen conflicting reports.  I imagine it's 3 as that would be a pretty easy pickup from NZF if it was 2 and someone played 3.

It's 3 - its in the regulations Here

thanks - I had a look at that but i must be reading the wrong place or reading it wrong?

18.4 

The NMYL Named Squad Players shall be made up of either: 

18.4.1 All Youth Players; or 

18.4.2 A combination of Youth Players and Non-Citizen Youth Players provided that the maximum number of Non-Citizen Youth Players is three (3).

I read this part - so I read it that teams are allowed 3 over age (or non-citizen youth players) but only 2 who are National league players. Hence as Luis Garcia says why players such as Clayton Lewis and Sarpreet Singh are listed as NYL players rather than NL

i took 18.4.2 as meaning you can only have three players in your playing squad that are not kiwi youth players?  

then 18.7 as saying you have up to 2 overage players from your NL squad.

Accepting that of course you can name players who are normally in the NL squad in your NYL squad which then don't count as overage players if you play them down.

For a real example does anyone know who the three Hamilton played last week were?  One was the welsh striker, the other two?

Yes you are right I misread the definition of non-citizen youth players

I'm sure the number used to be 3 as am fairly sure Nelson Falcons had 3 when they won the league 2 seasons ago. Which may be where the confusion comes from

Ah that will be the answer - I'm sure Nelson Falcons and Auckland United as youth only teams were allowed an extra over-age player.


So back to the Wanderers vs Suburbs game - the third player must have been a NL player registered in the NYL squad, or they only played two.

Trialist
29
·
54
·
about 9 years

anyone at HB v ACFC today? score? game details? cheers!

Phoenix Academy
130
·
440
·
over 16 years

watched team Wellington beat Eastern Suburbs today 2-0 . Both goals came early using big wind to go over the keeper , who should have done better . Wellington were a pleasure to watch compared to Suburbs , who are about 8 players short on quality . Not helped by the skipper Imrie walking out two weeks back on the team , and with it the best player up front . The enterprise shown by the visitors was how football should be played , and even after a red card in first half , they deserved the victory 

Phoenix Academy
130
·
440
·
over 16 years

Suurbier wrote:

anyone at HB v ACFC today? score? game details? cheers!

Heard it was 3-1 to Auckland 
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years
Starting XI
1.5K
·
4.9K
·
almost 16 years

Canterbury finished third in the yoof league on the weekend after thrashing Wellington 4-0 at English Park in their last game on Sunday.

And this after being down to ten players early in the second half and having another red-carded in the closing stages:

http://www.nzfootball.co.nz/wanderers-claim-youth-...

Final league table:

http://www.nzfootball.co.nz/national-youth-league/

Canterbury had the second best goal difference after Waitakere.

Probably the Dragons Youth's most memorable game would have been the amazing 6 - 5 away win vs. Tasman in their first game of the season back in mid October.

Full season's results (click on "Match Centre" beside any result for full details):

http://websites.sportstg.com/comp_info.cgi?c=1-449...

Ignore the top goal-scorer table for the league when you click on "Season Stats" as it's completely wrong.

It doesn't tally when you add up player's goals from individual matches.

Lyall Matthysen was the Dragons Youth top goal-scorer, while Daniel Thoms and Conor Smith also scored a lot.

Anyone know the real top goal-scorer table for the youth league?

This was a very high-scoring league with five, six, seven or more goals in a game not uncommon.

Even in games not involving Hawkes Bay who were total pants (Canterbury thrashed them 8-0 at English Park, they lost to Team Wellington Youth 9-0).

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

185 goals in 45 games average of 4.11 per game (almost the same as last years average of 4.2 per game)

Highest scoring 11 (Canterbury United 6 Tasman United 5)

Biggest winning margin 9 (Team Wellington 9 Hawke's Bay United 0)

44% of the games (20) had 5 or more goals in them (compared with 48 % last season)

Amazingly there were 2 0-0 draw's (Canterbury United v Auckland City & Team Wellington v Waitakere United)

Top scorers

10 Ihaia Delany (Team Wellington)

9 Alex Connor-McLean (Tasman United)

8 Matt Conroy (Wellington Phoenix)

7 Lyle Matthysen (Canterbury United)

6 Gilberto Souza (Waitakere United)

Phoenix Academy
100
·
370
·
over 9 years

inafoxhole wrote:

GK wrote:

Did Lewis tiller miss the cut for Hamilton Wanderers. Bummer. Football is a tough game.

Last seen playing at Glenfield wasn't he?

No, playing Against Glenfield for Bays at Bay City Park

WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

He's with Hawke's Bay United now, for the record.

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

National Youth League 2017  Draw

TWY playing home games at Memorial and Ole

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

New thread or re-brand for 17/18

Phoenix Academy
270
·
460
·
almost 10 years

http://www.twfc.co.nz/news-2/2017/10/1/team-wellin...

Training Squad (25 players):

14 x Western Suburbs

4 x Miramar

4 x Lower Hutt

1 x Petone

1 x Stop Out

1 x Karori 

Non training reserves (5)

3 x Lower Hutt

1 x North Wellington

1 x Island Bay

Edit: Ooops.. article says 2 x Lower Hutt (Singh & Nyatsanza) players in squad but not actually listed in the 25 so may/will have to amend the 25/5 players. 

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years
WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

Blew.2 wrote:

what the hell is the point of a non-training reserve

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

http://www.twfc.co.nz/news-2/2017/10/1/team-wellin...

Training Squad (25 players):

14 x Western Suburbs

4 x Miramar

4 x Lower Hutt

1 x Petone

1 x Stop Out

1 x Karori 

Non training reserves (5)

3 x Lower Hutt

1 x North Wellington

1 x Island Bay

Edit: Ooops.. article says 2 x Lower Hutt (Singh & Nyatsanza) players in squad but not actually listed in the 25 so may/will have to amend the 25/5 players. 

surely there is other clubs than these ones with decent youth?

Trialist
12
·
140
·
over 10 years

Does anyone know Canterbury dragons Youth team list?

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

inafoxhole wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

what the hell is the point of a non-training reserve

I believe it is due to possible unavailability once we get into exam time and away games, along with injury. (At least that's is what   I heard one year when they on had 1 sub available - a few years ago) 
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years

Feverish wrote:

http://www.twfc.co.nz/news-2/2017/10/1/team-wellin...

Training Squad (25 players):

14 x Western Suburbs

4 x Miramar

4 x Lower Hutt

1 x Petone

1 x Stop Out

1 x Karori 

Non training reserves (5)

3 x Lower Hutt

1 x North Wellington

1 x Island Bay

Edit: Ooops.. article says 2 x Lower Hutt (Singh & Nyatsanza) players in squad but not actually listed in the 25 so may/will have to amend the 25/5 players. 

surely there is other clubs than these ones with decent youth?

Did they get nominated or go to trials - 70+ did
WeeNix
200
·
950
·
over 14 years

Blew.2 wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

what the hell is the point of a non-training reserve

I believe it is due to possible unavailability once we get into exam time and away games, along with injury. (At least that's is what   I heard one year when they on had 1 sub available - a few years ago) 

yeah but, why not train?

Trialist
2
·
22
·
almost 8 years

It is a Western Suburbs/Miramar partnership - 90/10 in Wests favour due to Dave paying the bill.

Hence the 15/4 split.

I'd do the same!

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

Midline wrote:

It is a Western Suburbs/Miramar partnership - 90/10 in Wests favour due to Dave paying the bill.

Hence the 15/4 split.

I'd do the same!

No doubt the Wests lads are bloody good though 

Phoenix Academy
270
·
460
·
almost 10 years

Feverish wrote:

Midline wrote:

It is a Western Suburbs/Miramar partnership - 90/10 in Wests favour due to Dave paying the bill.

Hence the 15/4 split.

I'd do the same!

No doubt the Wests lads are bloody good though 

Miramar Reserve players (Cap 1) & Wests Reserve players (Cap Prem)  trump Central League players from other clubs.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

Feverish wrote:

Midline wrote:

It is a Western Suburbs/Miramar partnership - 90/10 in Wests favour due to Dave paying the bill.

Hence the 15/4 split.

I'd do the same!

No doubt the Wests lads are bloody good though 

Miramar Reserve players (Cap 1) & Wests Reserve players (Cap Prem)  trump Central League players from other clubs.

Did rapa, oly, Tawa,UH send trialists?

Trialist
2
·
22
·
almost 8 years

I rest my case!

Phoenix Academy
270
·
460
·
almost 10 years

quote=Feverish]

Feverish wrote:

Midline wrote:

It is a Western Suburbs/Miramar partnership - 90/10 in Wests favour due to Dave paying the bill.

Hence the 15/4 split.

I'd do the same!

[/quote]

No doubt the Wests lads are bloody good though

Miramar Reserve players (Cap 1) & Wests Reserve players (Cap Prem) trump Central League players from other clubs.

Did rapa, oly, Tawa,UH send trialists?

Yes - (at least UH & OLY did)

Unsure if correct but I heard that Wests players did not trial ? (or maybe just had their own internal trial ?)

- obviously exception could be made for likes of Just, Rogerson & Green, Clayton etc (regular Wests CL players), but its no real surprise/news the partner clubs have 72% of the training squad.

There will always be gripes by some about trials/process/bias - wether at TWY, NZU17, NZSS  etc but that's just the way things work/are. 

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
about 9 years

quote=Feverish]

Feverish wrote:

Midline wrote:

It is a Western Suburbs/Miramar partnership - 90/10 in Wests favour due to Dave paying the bill.

Hence the 15/4 split.

I'd do the same!

[/quote]

No doubt the Wests lads are bloody good though

Miramar Reserve players (Cap 1) & Wests Reserve players (Cap Prem) trump Central League players from other clubs.

Did rapa, oly, Tawa,UH send trialists?

Yes - (at least UH & OLY did)

Unsure if correct but I heard that Wests players did not trial ? (or maybe just had their own internal trial ?)

- obviously exception could be made for likes of Just, Rogerson & Green, Clayton etc (regular Wests CL players), but its no real surprise/news the partner clubs have 72% of the training squad.

There will always be gripes by some about trials/process/bias - wether at TWY, NZU17, NZSS  etc but that's just the way things work/are. 

2 seasons ago when Ole wouldn't allow their players to be involved, the majority of the team came from Lower Hutt as thats where the coach Lloyd O'Keefe was based - they won the league that year. Coaches will always go with the players they know.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

they should do well

Phoenix Academy
120
·
250
·
almost 17 years

howzat wrote:

Does anyone know Canterbury dragons Youth team list?

Canterbury squad (via facebook)

Marquee
500
·
6.6K
·
almost 15 years

wibbler wrote:

howzat wrote:

Does anyone know Canterbury dragons Youth team list?

Canterbury squad (via facebook)

Understand that Jacob Anderson has withdrawn from the squad.

Phoenix Academy
150
·
400
·
about 12 years

AllWhites82 wrote:

wibbler wrote:

howzat wrote:

Does anyone know Canterbury dragons Youth team list?

Canterbury squad (via facebook)

Understand that Jacob Anderson has withdrawn from the squad.

Yes he has

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up