EURO 2016

648 replies · 157,786 views
almost 10 years ago

Smithy wrote:

Based on FIFA rankings its Germany v Belgium Final....or could be Wales v Iceland !!

 

I heard on the radio yesterday that Iceland had gone from something like 126 to 20 in the World in two years prior to this tournament. Can that be right?

Being in Europe helps as you get more rankings points for getting results against higher ranked teams and Europe has the highest ranked teams. Also remember Iceland only missed out on qualification for Brazil 2014 in the playoff against Croatia so have been on a pretty good run

https://thejourneyfan.blogspot.co.nz/

New Zealand Football Media Association Website of the year 2015 & 2016

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Smithy wrote:

Based on FIFA rankings its Germany v Belgium Final....or could be Wales v Iceland !!

 

I heard on the radio yesterday that Iceland had gone from something like 126 to 20 in the World in two years prior to this tournament. Can that be right?

Being in Europe helps as you get more rankings points for getting results against higher ranked teams and Europe has the highest ranked teams. Also remember Iceland only missed out on qualification for Brazil 2014 in the playoff against Croatia so have been on a pretty good run

It's not just results against higher ranked teams which gets European teams more ranking points - there's a multiplier just for beating any UEFA opponent. So Iceland beating Luxembourg or San Marino or Latvia gets them more points than us beating PNG or Tahiti gets us. 

IMO that's one of the biggest flaws with the ranking system. There's a multiplier for the rank of your opponent already so why is there another multiplier just for the confederation you are in?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

2ndBest wrote:

How many constant failings does it take before you go from being a underperforming team, to a team that isn't actually that great?

who said England was great? No English supporter would unless deluded.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LeggyRay Hicks
almost 10 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

How many constant failings does it take before you go from being a underperforming team, to a team that isn't actually that great?

who said England was great? No English supporter would unless deluded.

 

Key qualifier.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Arsenal
almost 10 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

I guess you have never said something that you came to regret. 

They were poor  and I have never seen a worse performance from them.  If you look at all their games in the tournament saying that they were a 6 out of 10, they were a 3 out of 10 against Iceland.Not one player was even half decent, but you certainly can't  say that the players are rubbish- they played almost unbelievably poorly. The same as the AW's  in their last tournament. 

I picked them to make the last eight, but no further.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Leggy wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

I guess you have never said something that you came to regret. 

They were poor  and I have never seen a worse performance from them.  If you look at all their games in the tournament saying that they were a 6 out of 10, they were a 3 out of 10 against Iceland.Not one player was even half decent, but you certainly can't  say that the players are rubbish- they played almost unbelievably poorly. The same as the AW's  in their last tournament. 

I picked them to make the last eight, but no further.

 

Dale's not paid to be a football pundit.

He also didn't say anyone was rubbish.

Do you think that England squad had a chance of winning it? I don't. I thought they had a greater chance of going out in the group stage than going through to the final.

Lineker is (was) off his rocker!

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Smithy wrote:

Leggy wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

I guess you have never said something that you came to regret. 

They were poor  and I have never seen a worse performance from them.  If you look at all their games in the tournament saying that they were a 6 out of 10, they were a 3 out of 10 against Iceland.Not one player was even half decent, but you certainly can't  say that the players are rubbish- they played almost unbelievably poorly. The same as the AW's  in their last tournament. 

I picked them to make the last eight, but no further.

 

Dale's not paid to be a football pundit.

He also didn't say anyone was rubbish.

Do you think that England squad had a chance of winning it? I don't. I thought they had a greater chance of going out in the group stage than going through to the final.

Lineker is (was) off his rocker!

I did not think they would win it- last 16 was probably where they should have been. More  than likely he was taking the piss as he of all people would have known. 

I would doubt that any England supporter thought they would win the final. The last poll I saw before the Iceland game was only 36% thought they would make it to the last 8.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Bobby Charlton was asked how he thought the England team of '66 would have fared against Iceland. " I think we'd have won 1-0 " he replied. "Only 1-0?" Said the reporter. "Yes," said Bobby. "Most of us are in our 70's."

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
ArsenalBuffon IILeggynewzealandpower
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

I'm an England fan and I knew there was no chance we'd win but expected to probably make the quarter final. We had won 10 out of 10 in qualifying and looked pretty good throughout, and given the draw on paper I don't think that was being unreasonably arrogant. Didn't bank on Hodgson changing from a system that worked very well and putting too many of the wrong players in the wrong positions and generally having no idea what he was doing. It wasn't unreasonable to think that based on the sustained level of form over the last 2 years that they could have done better than they ended up doing.

Also Linekar is an English pundit catering to an English audience. Out of his mind if he really believed that they could win it, but I doubt many pundits from other nations said "we have no chance and shouldn't even bother turning up" either. 

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Ray Hicks
almost 10 years ago

ajc28 wrote:
 It wasn't unreasonable to think that based on the sustained level of form over the last 2 years that they could have done better than they ended up doing.

When you look at their track record in tournaments i wouldn't have expected anything more than a QF at most.

England have only won 6 knockout matches in 50 years since winning the World Cup. These are: Paraguay (86), Belgium (90), Cameroon (90), Spain (96), Denmark (02), Ecuador (06).

Belgium and Cameroon were both after extra time and Spain was won on penalties. So 3 (THREE) knockout wins inside 90 minutes in 50 years. Not a very good record.

In reality England going out at the first hurdle of the knockouts is about par.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Bullionel grapaduraLG
almost 10 years ago

Smithy wrote:

Leggy wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Looking at the teams in this tournament, England could actually win the darn thing.

— Gary Lineker (@GaryLineker) June 25, 2016


I guess you have never said something that you came to regret. 

They were poor  and I have never seen a worse performance from them.  If you look at all their games in the tournament saying that they were a 6 out of 10, they were a 3 out of 10 against Iceland.Not one player was even half decent, but you certainly can't  say that the players are rubbish- they played almost unbelievably poorly. The same as the AW's  in their last tournament. 

I picked them to make the last eight, but no further.

 

Dale's not paid to be a football pundit.

He also didn't say anyone was rubbish.

Do you think that England squad had a chance of winning it? I don't. I thought they had a greater chance of going out in the group stage than going through to the final.

Lineker is (was) off his rocker!

I think you need to remember he is a BBC pundit commentating for a predominantly English Audience. So what he says about Engerland needs to be taken with a pinch of salt
Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

I think Iceland played bloody well.

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LGnewzealandpower
almost 10 years ago

Portugal bore their way to another win via pens vs Poland...still haven't won a game in normal time...I guess it's that small team mentality ?

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LG
almost 10 years ago

D-Sidi wrote:

Portugal bore their way to another win via pens vs Poland...still haven't won a game in normal time...I guess it's that small team mentality ?

And it's quite conceivable that they'll make the final without winning a game in 90 minutes at this tournament.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
LG
almost 10 years ago

Portugal are gonna win it, aren't they?

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Oska
almost 10 years ago

Semi final with 5 draws. Could win the whole thing without winning a game.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago
More like Drawtugal
I have an amazing ability to find my way out of mazes. I'm pathological. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ajc28 wrote:

Semi final with 5 draws. Could win the whole thing without winning a game.

I think any of the Germany/France/Italy in the final beats them. Italy and Portugal final sounds unwatchable.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

Italy-Portugal would have 0-0 and penalties written all over it.

In 510 minutes of football each Portugal have led for about 20 minutes and are in the semi final and Poland didn't trail for a single minute and are out.

Weird how these things go sometimes. One team through to the semi without winning a game and the other out without losing one or even being behind in one. Don't know how Poland scraped through this far tbh, they never looked much good.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

The way Portugal have played so far and the tactics usually employed by Italy throughout history? To beat an Italian team who only need a draw is one of the the toughest tasks in the game.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Ronaldo was so shark. So, so shark.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

That air shot in front of goal was brilliant. Shame it didn't cost them.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
ConanTroutman
almost 10 years ago

The only difference between Ronaldo & Rooney in this tournament is that Portugal are in a semi. Otherwise both players have played absolute crap and of the ability that would warrent 2k per week max,not the 200k (or more) that they are on.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

To be fair Ronaldo did pretty much single handedly get them back into a match they should have lost against Hungary. Rooney hasn't produced a match winning or even saving performance for England at a tournament since he was an Everton player.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Lonegunmen wrote:

The only difference between Ronaldo & Rooney in this tournament is that Portugal are in a semi. Otherwise both players have played absolute crap and of the ability that would warrent 2k per week max,not the 200k (or more) that they are on.

 

Perhaps true but weird comparison. Ronaldo is one of the most credentialed players in the world, arguably the best of his generation. Rooney is...bald?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

Smithy wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

The only difference between Ronaldo & Rooney in this tournament is that Portugal are in a semi. Otherwise both players have played absolute crap and of the ability that would warrent 2k per week max,not the 200k (or more) that they are on.

 

Perhaps true but weird comparison. Ronaldo is one of the most credentialed players in the world, arguably the best of his generation. Rooney is...bald?

And Portugal made it the 6th time in row to at least 1/2 final in the Euro's. (As far as I remember)

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

ajc28 wrote:

To be fair Ronaldo did pretty much single handedly get them back into a match they should have lost against Hungary. Rooney hasn't produced a match winning or even saving performance for England at a tournament since he was an Everton player.

He is also clearly well below full fitness and the fact he got into about 4 good goal scoring positions was the result of some pretty clever and efficient movement. Woeful finishing though.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

The 2 air shots I saw were brilliant. At club level I have seen him put away much more difficult stuff away for fun.

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

The youngster Renato Sanchis has been a bit of a revelation for Portugal though.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Bayern Munich paid 50 mill for him. Not bad for an 18 year old. 

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

Always the way. Hadn't heard of him before this tournament and was just thinking he looked pretty good this morning then heard that.Feels like every time someone new emerges and looks good Bayern or Real etc have already bought them.

That was some penalty too. When he stepped forward I was thinking it was too big a moment for an 18 year old but that you won't see many better penalties than that.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago · edited almost 10 years ago · History

That 18-year-old ought to teach Brockie how to play and take a penalty like a mature, calm, composed player.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

My hunches:

Wales v Belgium = Belgium

Germany v Italy = Germany

France v Iceland = France

SEMIS:

Portugal v Belgium = Belgium

Germany v France = Germany

FINAL:

Belgium v Germany = Germany

Big Pete 65, Christchurch

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Fantasic scrambling off the line for Wales there.  Save from inside the 6 yard box, then two clearances off the line by defenders in quick succession.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Wow, no scrambling could stop that! Great strike from Nainggolan to go 1-0 up.

Permalink Permalink
almost 10 years ago

Jaume wrote:

That 18-year-old ought to teach Brockie how to play and take a penalty like a mature, calm, composed player.

 

On Facebook this week Brocks posted a photo of him and his son who is about 2. Former All Whites assistant coach Brian Turner was the first to comment with "probably takes better penalties than you Brocks."

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
aitkenmikeJaumeMainland FC