General Football Discussion

Final "Violence"

87 replies · 24,072 views
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Final "Violence"

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Having skimmed through the press here in the UK and spoken to people in the office, it appears that I watched a different final to everyone else last night.  Everything is about how thuggish the dutch were, only kicking lumps out of the spaniards, etc.  This is off Football365, with my reaction to it below:
 
Mark van Bommel
While some may justifiably argue that going down easily and encouraging the referee to produce yellow cards, as the Spanish did, is at best underhand, the cynicism of Van Bommel - not just in this game - was astonishing. Still, it was a game plan and, for the first half at least, it worked very well. On a moral level, the kicking and so forth is similar to Luis Suarez's handball, but the difference is that Van Bommel's cheating (and he was obviously not the only one, merely the orchestrator) could quite easily break ankles.
 
Now I know it is the in-thing to slag off Van Brommell at the moment, but what the fcuk is going on?  The reason there were a number of bookings for the dutch was that Webb set the standard by booking Van Persie in the first 10 minutes for a nothing challenge.  From that point on he had to keep booking players for every foul they committed.  Van Brommell gave away about 4 fouls in the whole game, with only one being of any note (the one he got booked for).  Alan Hansen at half time was saying he should have been sent off because he gave away 3 fouls in the first half, and (brilliantly) "he won a sliding tackle which he could have missed the ball and fouled the other player, so that could have been 4 yellows he could have got in that half".  What a c0ck.
 
There was one bad tackle in the game - De Jong, which I actually think was more accidental (he didn't see Alonso coming) but could certainly warrant a straight red.  The other tackle they went on about was Van Brommells booking which was no worse than Puyol's booking in the first half (both going through the back of a player).  Puyol's was never mentioned again, despite the fact he tried to bring down Robben when through on goal - cheating on a moral level similar to Suarez.
 
What are other people's view on this - I am hoping that it will be slightly more impartial than what you get here (where everyone follows what they read in the Sun).
Frankie Mac2010-07-12 21:17:21

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Webb did well. Free kick and cards deserved. Could have given more (De Jong straight red and Robben for kicking away ball). And he was consistent.

Van Bommell was a disgrace - went out there to kick Xavi round the field.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:

Webb did well. Free kick and cards deserved. Could have given more (De Jong straight red and Robben for kicking away ball). And he was consistent.

Van Bommell was a disgrace - went out there to kick Xavi round the field.
 
I am pretty sure he gave away 4 fouls in the whole game - 1 against Puyol at the start, one where he got booked (not sure who against, but no worse than Puyol on Robben), one on Xavi about 30 minutes in, and then one in extra time.  Hardly a concerted effort to break legs.
 
Near the end of (I think) the second half, he went near Ineista who screamed, dived on the ground and lay there before realising that he wasn't getting the free kick, so he got up and body checked VB while he was jogging away (no where near the ball).  Why is that not mentioned as blatant cheating?  Why is Puyol not being called a cheat?  Why was Biscuits (and pretty kuch every Spanish player) not booked for complaining to the ref and waving imaginary cards?

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Robben played on when Puyol grabbed him (surprisingly - prob cos he was outside the box) so could not be called.
Realistically players dont get booked for waving imaginary cards

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Im kind of with Frankie on this...It wasn't a dirty game at all. Didn't think Webb had the most amazing of games. He seemed to book a lot of players for nothing,and the only bad tackle was the kick to the chest.
 
 

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
Robben played on when Puyol grabbed him (surprisingly - prob cos he was outside the box) so could not be called.
Realistically players dont get booked for waving imaginary cards
Although it would be kind of cool if they did.

OK son, you want a booking? Well, here's one!

I know, I know, its serious!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
They did crack down on it hard for a while there im certain. I miss when they did. Should be as automatic as the yellow you get for removing your shirt.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
agree, i was pissed off by the spanish 'card' waving bollocks


fifa has been gutless about that and the diving and dying swan acts from some players/teams

having said that, the dutch were always risking a a double yellow though - given the attitude of some of the other refs in this tournament it could have ended up as a 5-a-side match



Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Although I'll admit that I'm slightly biased towards Holland, it has to be said that the standard that Webb set with that first yellow was what made for a messy card-fest of a game.

I'm not blaming the ref for us losing because I think Spain were the more skilful/threatening side, but it was a sh*t game because of the way he handled it. While he gave some soft cards early on, he missed some fouls and gave less for far more cynical offences later on in the game.

I also think Spain tried to draw fouls/cards out of the ref because they knew the Dutch were going to get stuck in and make tackles - like they had all tournament - and it worked for the Spanish. I think the Italians also employed this as a tactic against the All Whites.

So the Dutch have been labelled as the cynical ones but I think that's bollocks. Both as bad as each other IMO.

I mostly agree with you Frankie.TopLeft072010-07-12 21:53:22

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I find it strange when people agree with me.  Can someone call me a c**t to make this thread a bit more normal?

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
I find it strange when people agree with me.  Can someone call me a c**t to make this thread a bit more normal?
I agree with you,but you're still a c**t.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm sure it was mentioned at the beginning of last years A-League that gesturing to the referee to produce cards would be a cautionable offence for USB/Dissent.

If it wasn't the A-League there was a directive somewhere fairly recently to do this

When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
TopLeft07 wrote:
I also think Spain tried to draw fouls/cards out of the ref because they knew the Dutch were going to get stuck in and make tackles - like they had all tournament - and it worked for the Spanish. I think the Italians also employed this as a tactic against the All Whites.
I forgot to mention the gesturing of cards which is a pretty obvious indication of this tactic to draw fouls and cards.

I'm not being sour about the result but it's no secret it was one hell of an ugly game. Which is unfortunate considering it's the most important/most watched/most talked about game of football in four years.

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
some pundits make a case for RVP to be lucky to stay on the field...it was only because it was so early he was not dismissed.

what exactly was van Bommel's contribution to this game, or in fact the tournament Frankie?
also how is a player or team most likely to react after receiving his 'tackle' on Xavi?

sometimes players bring out the worst in their opposition. seemingly a sure-fire way to do this is to kick their attacking players.

E's Flat Ah's Flat Too

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
foal30 wrote:
some pundits make a case for RVP to be lucky to stay on the field...it was only because it was so early he was not dismissed. [/QUOTE]
 
jesus - if that is considered a straight red card, I really fear for the game.

foal30 wrote:
what exactly was van Bommel's contribution to this game, or in fact the tournament Frankie?[/QUOTE]
 
he broke up play and made it difficult for other teams to attack against Holland.  Not every player in a team has to be an attacking player, who creates chances and scores goals, and you cannot villify the players who aren't.  Mascherano gives away plenty of fouls but is hardly ever criticised because that is what his job is.  It just seems to be the current trend to is hate Van Bommell.

[QUOTE=foal30] also how is a player or team most likely to react after receiving his 'tackle' on Xavi?
 
I guess that they get up (Xavi wasn't injured), get the ball and play on from the free kick.  Fouls happen in football - it is a contact sport and sometimes people get kicked.  Puyol going through Robben early on was a good old fashioned reducer on a star player that he got booked for, in the same way that VB's foul on Xavi was.  No big deal (or so I would have thought).

[QUOTE=foal30] sometimes players bring out the worst in their opposition. seemingly a sure-fire way to do this is to kick their attacking players.

 
Not sure what you mean here.

All I do is make the stuff I would've liked
Reference things I wanna watch, reference girls I wanna bite
Now I'm firefly like a burning kite
And yousa fake fuck like a fleshlight

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:

Webb did well. Free kick and cards deserved. Could have given more (De Jong straight red and Robben for kicking away ball). And he was consistent.

Van Bommell was a disgrace - went out there to kick Xavi round the field.
 
This. Never mind Iniesta.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
iniesta did go down very easily

the one where van bommell went in for a challenge, iniesta went flying to ground holding his shin and screaming in pain, realised the ref hadnt called the foul so quickly jumped up and checked into van bommell.

a few other times iniesta seemed to go down with little or no contact.


Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Frankie Mac wrote:
Feverish wrote:

Webb did well. Free kick and cards deserved. Could have given more (De Jong straight red and Robben for kicking away ball). And he was consistent.

Van Bommell was a disgrace - went out there to kick Xavi round the field.
 
I am pretty sure he gave away 4 fouls in the whole game - 1 against Puyol at the start, one where he got booked (not sure who against, but no worse than Puyol on Robben), one on Xavi about 30 minutes in, and then one in extra time.  Hardly a concerted effort to break legs.
 
Near the end of (I think) the second half, he went near Ineista who screamed, dived on the ground and lay there before realising that he wasn't getting the free kick, so he got up and body checked VB while he was jogging away (no where near the ball).  Why is that not mentioned as blatant cheating?  Why is Puyol not being called a cheat?  Why was Biscuits (and pretty kuch every Spanish player) not booked for complaining to the ref and waving imaginary cards?
 
 I love that moment so much.  he just gets up, looks at that dirty c**t, and body checks him. Body checks him for Spain, but also for the whole tournament. Such a heart, our little Andres. Its not cheating. Get over yourself. Its letting that prick know that he is sick of him and his team mates just getting kicked whenever they get the ball. You mention only four fouls? Are you serious? What about the one on Iniesta just before he body checks him. He was fouling, not only all game, but all tournament.
 
There is a big difference between Mascherano and this guy, and Mascherano isn't a thug about it. Yeah, its their job to break up the game, but you watch Busquets- he doesn't just foul players left, right and centre. With Javier, there are fouls, sure, and he generally gets punished if they aren't good tackles. I don't think I've seen van Bommel make one good tackle all tournament. Just kick any good player, and whinge. I hate him so much. Maybe he should be arrested for assault because I don't see any football in him.
 
Puyol isn't being called a cheat because there is more to his game than kicking players. Busquets and "the rest of the Spanish team" aren't being called cheats because they are just reacting to some sickening tackles and some stupid, cynical, play. If all you are going to do is kick Spain off the park, in a final, then don't bother coming at all, and don't expect to make any friends. For me, the 'theatrics' of football are othing compared to potentially breaking someone's legs. Oh yeah, and Robben, the biggest cheat of them all.
 
But anyway, it is a victory for beautiful football.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Downey26 wrote:
iniesta did go down very easily

the one where van bommell went in for a challenge, iniesta went flying to ground holding his shin and screaming in pain, realised the ref hadnt called the foul so quickly jumped up and checked into van bommell.

a few other times iniesta seemed to go down with little or no contact.


 
Why? Because if Holland are playing the way they did, then you play cynically too. Because your normal game plan cannot work. But also, because it was ridiculous.
 
You just hate him cos of his wonderful strike against Chelsea anyway. Inieeeeeesta, Inieeeeeesta!
 
Van Bommel should have a piece of his own medicine anyway. Maybe he was hurt but his anger pushed the pain away...
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If Spain play beautiful football I'm becoming a rugby fan.  They scored 8 goals in 7 matches and every Spain match I watched was dull.  Iniesta and Xavi are so overrated in my opinion.  Good technical players but nothing to set the heart racing.  Germany, Argentina, Uruguay, and even the Netherlands (at times) were far more attractive footballing sides. 
 
I agree with Frankie that the game was not as bad as the number of cards suggested.  What seriously annoyed me with the current world champion football team is their gamesmanship and their persistent demand for opposition players to be booked.  Just loathsome and low and the sign of a team without the confidence to win on its own merits.  To see football how it should be played watch Germany in this World Cup.  See how their players respond to being fouled - see how they get on with the game and put the fouls behind them.  Real men not the effeminate, histrionic Iberians.  (And until this World Cup I was no fan of the Germans - believe me!)
 
As for van Bommel, he's a classic ball winning midfielder.  A bit dirty yes, but not a bad footballer either.  Don't caricature him...
Selhurst Park, 25 January 1995
What else could he have done?
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
El-Ni�o wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
iniesta did go down very easily

the one where van bommell went in for a challenge, iniesta went flying to ground holding his shin and screaming in pain, realised the ref hadnt called the foul so quickly jumped up and checked into van bommell.

a few other times iniesta seemed to go down with little or no contact.


 
Why? Because if Holland are playing the way they did, then you play cynically too. Because your normal game plan cannot work. But also, because it was ridiculous.
 
You just hate him cos of his wonderful strike against Chelsea anyway. Inieeeeeesta, Inieeeeeesta!
 
Van Bommel should have a piece of his own medicine anyway. Maybe he was hurt but his anger pushed the pain away...

 
now now i never said i hate him (theres a thread of who i hate in the english forums ) i dont blame him for that debacle

just pointing out what i thought



Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Downey26 wrote:
El-Ni�o wrote:
Downey26 wrote:
iniesta did go down very easily

the one where van bommell went in for a challenge, iniesta went flying to ground holding his shin and screaming in pain, realised the ref hadnt called the foul so quickly jumped up and checked into van bommell.

a few other times iniesta seemed to go down with little or no contact.


 
Why? Because if Holland are playing the way they did, then you play cynically too. Because your normal game plan cannot work. But also, because it was ridiculous.
 
You just hate him cos of his wonderful strike against Chelsea anyway. Inieeeeeesta, Inieeeeeesta!
 
Van Bommel should have a piece of his own medicine anyway. Maybe he was hurt but his anger pushed the pain away...

 
now now i never said i hate him (theres a thread of who i hate in the english forums ) i dont blame him for that debacle

just pointing out what i thought



 
Nah fair enough. I was just being a dick and trying to wind you up, but you rose to be the better man!
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If Spain play beautiful football I'm becoming a rugby fan.  They scored 8 goals in 7 matches and every Spain match I watched was dull.  Iniesta and Xavi are so overrated in my opinion.  Good technical players but nothing to set the heart racing.  Germany, Argentina, Uruguay, and even the Netherlands (at times) were far more attractive footballing sides. 
 
I agree with Frankie that the game was not as bad as the number of cards suggested.  What seriously annoyed me with the current world champion football team is their gamesmanship and their persistent demand for opposition players to be booked.  Just loathsome and low and the sign of a team without the confidence to win on its own merits.  To see football how it should be played watch Germany in this World Cup.  See how their players respond to being fouled - see how they get on with the game and put the fouls behind them.  Real men not the effeminate, histrionic Iberians.  (And until this World Cup I was no fan of the Germans - believe me!)
 
As for van Bommel, he's a classic ball winning midfielder.  A bit dirty yes, but not a bad footballer either.  Don't caricature him...
 
Yeah, 8 goals, okay. But did you even watch the games? It isn't as if you can score many goals when every team you play puts ten men inside the box. How can you even play against that? Every team you play. Iniesta and Xavi are ridiculously good and have won just about everything there is to win in Spain, and now in international football too. If you can't appreciate them, I don't know why you even watch the game. They pass better than anyone I have ever seen (okay, i'm young, but still). Fantastic players. Far more attractive because teams actually opened up a bit against them (Or a lot, in the case of Germany). I don't know if you saw the Euro 2008 games too, but thats what happens when you open up against Spain. Beautiful football.
 
Give me a break. "Real men"? "Effeminate, histrionic Iberians"? I don't even know what to say to that. Good on you, mate. You must be real big. But do you know? We won the f**king World Cup. So keep talking. I didn't see the Germans getting kicked from all sides in every game they played in, though. And its totally different cultures and styles of football. There isn't a "right way" to play football, but it'd have been nice if a team that was good enough to get to the final, actually tried to play a bit, too.
 
Yeah, I have no problem with ball-winning midfielders, I just think you could be a bit classy about it. he has done nothing in this World Cup other than kick any slightly talented footballer off the park. A bit dirty? The dirtiest prick at the World Cup. Bar none.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Exaggeration with a touch of hysteria there El Nino

I thought the ref did well, it was a tough final, both sides had decent chances, the slightly better side won. Holland learnt from the German game that they had to be in their faces or be denied possession. Fair enough. It was tough but not over violent to me.

The only thing I'd like cracked down on is players "assaulting" the ref. Leave it just to the captain
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hepatitis wrote:


The only thing I'd like cracked down on is players "assaulting" the ref. Leave it just to the captain
 
Thats all anyone had to say, not labelling the team of champions as 'cheats'.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Seems odd to me that, even though Spain won, people are still b!tching about how hard done they were and how "violent" the Dutch were.
 
What did people expect, given that it was a World Cup Final? That we'd sit back and allow Spain space and possesion, allow them to play the game how they wanted? Or that, in order to disrupt their game we'd fight for every ball, try to close them down by any means neccessary, haggle and frustrate them and hope that, given the obvious strengths of their game, we'd be able to boss them enough to come out on top.
 
Yes, there were a few hard challenges, but the Spanish milked every opportunity the could. Yes, we got a bit of slack from the ref, but so did Spain.
 
To me, going down quicker than Paris Hilton in the Twin Towers, rolling 15 metres clutching your appendanges in writhing agony for phantom or nothing touches, playing for fouls, and trying to con cards out of the ref is far more despicable than putting in a hard challenge to try and win the ball.
 
You won, so STFU and enjoy it...
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
Exaggeration with a touch of hysteria there El Nino

 
Yeah, fair enough, but you have to understand that I am having to defend my team's football. Which is crazy. All the squad are heroes in Spain. It is such an amazing moment for the whole country. So I feel I have to stand up for them, you see? 
 
And anyway, as the old cliche goes, you only have to win 1-0...
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Seems odd to me that, even though Spain won, people are still b!tching about how hard done they were and how "violent" the Dutch were.
 
What did people expect, given that it was a World Cup Final? That we'd sit back and allow Spain space and possesion, allow them to play the game how they wanted? Or that, in order to disrupt their game we'd fight for every ball, try to close them down by any means neccessary, haggle and frustrate them and hope that, given the obvious strengths of their game, we'd be able to boss them enough to come out on top.
 
Yes, there were a few hard challenges, but the Spanish milked every opportunity the could. Yes, we got a bit of slack from the ref, but so did Spain.
 
To me, going down quicker than Paris Hilton in the Twin Towers, rolling 15 metres clutching your appendanges in writhing agony for phantom or nothing touches, playing for fouls, and trying to con cards out of the ref is far more despicable than putting in a hard challenge to try and win the ball.
 
You won, so STFU and enjoy it...
 
Yeah, we don't expect space, but the Dutch went into the game having won everything for the last two years, so we thought that maybe we would come against a team who would play a little football too. And we come up against that? That was worse than anyone we had played in the tournament!
 
Yeah, it would be, if they were even going for the ball... But when there is more chance of pushing someone's heart out the other side of his body that making contct with the ball, you have to see why we would be unhappy.
 
Enjoy it? Of course I am! We all are  but people are accusing us of unfair things and we love these players, so we are trying to help them. but, at the end of the day, we don't really care because we are champions, and we have waited forever for this moment.
 
Credit to you though, it was the hardest game we played, and you got into our midfield, as expected, and tried to break it all up. It would have been nice if you had played a little bit too.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
El-Ni�o wrote:
And anyway, as the old cliche goes, you only have to win 1-0...
 
How true.
 
To be honest, I think Spain may have pipped us if it had gone to penalties as well.
 
Casillas is one cool cucumber...
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It was a well taken goal,, well done, and enjoy your time to the fullest bro


Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
It was a well taken goal, which was only scored due to Heitinga not being there because the diving midget conned the ref into thinking he was fouled.
 
fixed
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
hepatitis wrote:
It was a well taken goal, which was only scored due to Heitinga not being there because the diving midget conned the ref into thinking he was fouled.
 
fixed


Double fixed
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 Qualtiy corrections!
 
 San Iker is the best keeper in the world.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The amount of ridiculousness in this thread is amazing. The Dutch complaining about the referee? They should be counting their lucky stars they didn't lose the game by default, that's how bad they were. A sh*tload of unnecessary fouls (players going passed and then getting kicked just as a 'reminder', etc), some very violent, and one you'd end up going to jail for if you did it on the street. I don't really know what people would expect the Spanish to do when they were having lumps kicked out of them for most of the game.

And don't give me this 'it's a physical game, we're not gonna let them pass the ball all day'. Watch Paraguay's first half against Spain (best half anyone's played against them) - high pressing all over the field, constant pressure on the main ball players, effective closing down of passing lanes, and threatening pace up front. Without any display of overly physical aggression, bad fouling or cynicism. Unfortunately for them, they ran out of steam and couldn't continue with that in the second half, and Spain got a bit more time and space to work with.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
The amount of ridiculousness in this thread is amazing. The Dutch complaining about the referee? They should be counting their lucky stars they didn't lose the game by default, that's how bad they were. A sh*tload of unnecessary fouls (players going passed and then getting kicked just as a 'reminder', etc), some very violent, and one you'd end up going to jail for if you did it on the street. I don't really know what people would expect the Spanish to do when they were having lumps kicked out of them for most of the game.

And don't give me this 'it's a physical game, we're not gonna let them pass the ball all day'. Watch Paraguay's first half against Spain (best half anyone's played against them) - high pressing all over the field, constant pressure on the main ball players, effective closing down of passing lanes, and threatening pace up front. Without any display of overly physical aggression, bad fouling or cynicism. Unfortunately for them, they ran out of steam and couldn't continue with that in the second half, and Spain got a bit more time and space to work with.
 
Yeah. This. Paraguay showed people how you can defend against us, but nobody listened.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

El-Nino, I think your (relative) youth is coming to the fore here.  This Spanish team is a good team but I wouldn't rate it against the 1986 Argentina team, the 1982 Brazil team, the 1998 France team and so on.  In terms of simulation they come close to the 1990 German team though!  My point is simple: Xavi and Iniesta may be good players, but they are not great.  They are not players who can take a game by the (metaphorical) scruff of the neck and boss it single-handedly (note I am not talking as a team, but single-handedly).  Great players can.  In a way I think Spain were fortunate to be in a tournament with waning teams (France, Italy, England), defensively naive teams (Argentina, Uruguay), and (perhaps) one-dimensional teams (Holland, Brazil).  My team of the tournament was Germany because they played beautiful football.  Football that was exciting, enthusiastic, fair, and determined.  They played with attacking intent and desire.  This is the type of football most fans want to see succeed.  They scored and immediately tried to score again.

I think the quality of individual play at this tournament has been disappointing.  None of the expected big stars fired (Rooney, Ronaldo, Messi, Torres) and while I accept Muller and Forlan were really excellent, I don't accept that Sneijder or Villa were exceptional.  Maybe they stood out due to the absence of great football from others.

My take on a lot of the analysis of the World Cup is that a lot of people regurgitate the views of journalists who have an agenda before the game is even played.  The people determined to praise Ronaldo (three man-of-the-match awards!), Messi, Xavi etc etc irrespective of what they do.  A lot of football fans also seem determined to show how clever they are by repeating these same pronouncements.  I just call the games the way I see them - not trying to score points by mentioning the important names ("must praise Xavi, Iniesta, Villa").  Instead, I thought one of the best players for Spain was Ramos, and of course Navas when he came on and actually played football!  Modern football is all about image - and the desire to idolise Rooney, Torres, Messi, Ronaldo blinds people to the reality.  For example Ronaldo was nowhere near the best Portugese player - let alone a man of the match winner.

If you are really Spanish (but a fan of the Wellington Phoenix?) then I'm sure you'll enjoy your triumph.  God knows Spain needs something in light of financial events in that country.  But the truth is the team is not exceptional, resorts to simulation, and acts in a most unsporting manner in an attempt to influence referees and gain advantage.  You're welcome to the trophy on those terms.  This is the 9th World Cup I've watched (albeit I only saw the final in 1978) and I don't rate Spain as one of the better teams or better winners in those 9 final series.
Selhurst Park, 25 January 1995
What else could he have done?
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
My point is simple: Xavi and Iniesta may be good players, but they are not great.� They are not players who can take a game by the (metaphorical) scruff of the neck and boss it single-handedly (note I am not talking as a team, but single-handedly).�


This is just simply wrong. They are the best two midfielders in the world by a long, long way, and have been completely and utterly dominant for the past 3-4 years, and are probably the best midefield duo the world has seen in the last 20 years (although neither was at their best in the World Cup, understandable since both had been injured in the latter stages of the season, but who even mentiones that, eh?). The teams they play for have lost (Barcelona and Spain), hmm, maybe 10 games in total in the last 3 seasons? out of perhaps 200-odd they'd played in that period. But of course, that's not a sign of greatness. Would have been exactly the same if Carrick and Fletcher were playing for those teams.

And yes, the Germans, so deserving of winning this World Cup. So full of attacking intent that they even managed to have one shot on target against Spain. Brilliant football to watch, that. Clearly robbed of the final by those unattractive Spanish thugs who barely mustered some 20 shots on goal in the game, the cynical bastards that they are (and who, by the way, averaged most shots per game than any other team in the World Cup this time around). The reality is that the Spanish won tis World Cup playing with many of its best players coming back from an injury (Torres, Iniesta, to a lesser extent Xavi) and in poor t average form, and still won without too much hassle. But clearly, it's just their luck everyone else was more crap than them.

We really need a facepalm emoticon for this forum.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If Spain play beautiful football I'm becoming a rugby fan.  They scored 8 goals in 7 matches and every Spain match I watched was dull. SNIP
 
Spain are now the lowest scoring team (in the final tournament) to ever win the World Cup. Not that goals is the sole indicator of quality, of course, but it did make me wonder why the commentators kept talking up the scoring ability of the Spanish. The previous all-time low was 11 goals - Italy in 38 (4 games), England in 66 (6 games), Brazil in 94 - so 8 goals in 7 games is quite a drop.
 
Oh, and on the fouls etc - Van Persie was very lucky not to get carded in the first minute, but overall I thought Webb did well. It was a physical match with several meaty fouls, justifiably picking up cards for both teams.
 
PS At the other end, Spain only conceded two goals - as with France in 98 and Italy in 06 - so at an aggregate level, quite a lack of goals for a winning team.
SiNZ2010-07-13 12:57:54
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

El gradapura, you probably cut and pasted your second paragraph from a UK newspaper site.  I think you'll find people will be talking about the Germany games against Argentina and England as their memories of this tournament, maybe Holland v Brazil,  before they mention any of the Spanish games.  (Spain v Portugal was execrable.)  And in the pantheon of footballing stars I don't think Xavi and Iniesta will be mentioned in the same breath as the truly greats.  But that doesn't deny they are fine players.

If Xavi and Iniesta are so utterly dominant by a long long way why haven't Barcelona won the Champions League and La Liga every one of the last four years? 
 
I think the Boxhead picture is an excellent avatar for you.
Cantona forever2010-07-13 12:54:46
Selhurst Park, 25 January 1995
What else could he have done?
Permalink Permalink