General Football Discussion

Germany vs England

134 replies · 27,138 views
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Footpaul wrote:

Even though Germany was certainly the better team, English fans rightfully can ask 'what if we weren't an abysmally crap football team that were bloody lucky to even make the knockout round?'.


fixed again

When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ginger_eejit wrote:
C-Diddy wrote:
ginger_eejit wrote:
robags wrote:
how did the lino not give that!!!!!?????


Because he was starting his run from 17 yds upfield, from his correct position in line with the 2nd last German defender - so really wasn't in a great position to call whether or not the ball had crossed the line
 
 
This!
 
The fact that both the linesman and the referee could not see that the ball had croosed the line by the best part of a metre spells the end of international duty for them both, and their positions on the field don't count for sh*t. Concentration-wise these guys are not up to standard and Fifa needs to look at its selection policies. We wouldn't accept this level of ineptitude in the A-league let alone the biggest stage in football.


Bollox

Referee was about 28 yds out from the middle of the goal
A/R was about 30 yds out from the middle of the goal (assuming 25 yds from middle of goal to sideline and he was 17 yds up the sideline).

Assuming the ref or A/R is 2m tall, and he is 30m away - his angle of elevated view of where the ball hits the ground is 4 deg.

Trying to make a microsecond judgement of a lateral distance difference of12-15inches from 30 yds away with a 4deg angle of view is a huge optical challenge.

I think this was the major difficulty faced by the officals, not any lack of concentration

None of the cameras that showed the ball clearly crossed the line were from the same position and view that either the ref or the A/R had.

As I said in another thread - it's a well known difficulty in current officiating methodology on dealing with goal line calls from shots from far out when the defence is high up the field and the A/R is suppsoed to maintain position with the 2nd last defender - then follow the shot through.

Perhaps one of the reasons they were trialling Goal Area A/Rs in the Europa league.
 
Last word on it from me. Try a little experiment at your local park. Place the ball 18 inches behind the line and walk backwards and diagonally  and see just how far you have to walk before it gets even close to being contentious as to whether the ball is over the line. Imagine how much easier this is on a perfectly manicured pitch with freshely painted lines.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
ginger_eejit wrote:
C-Diddy wrote:
ginger_eejit wrote:
robags wrote:
how did the lino not give that!!!!!?????


Because he was starting his run from 17 yds upfield, from his correct position in line with the 2nd last German defender - so really wasn't in a great position to call whether or not the ball had crossed the line
 
 
This!
 
The fact that both the linesman and the referee could not see that the ball had croosed the line by the best part of a metre spells the end of international duty for them both, and their positions on the field don't count for sh*t. Concentration-wise these guys are not up to standard and Fifa needs to look at its selection policies. We wouldn't accept this level of ineptitude in the A-league let alone the biggest stage in football.


Bollox

Referee was about 28 yds out from the middle of the goal
A/R was about 30 yds out from the middle of the goal (assuming 25 yds from middle of goal to sideline and he was 17 yds up the sideline).

Assuming the ref or A/R is 2m tall, and he is 30m away - his angle of elevated view of where the ball hits the ground is 4 deg.

Trying to make a microsecond judgement of a lateral distance difference of12-15inches from 30 yds away with a 4deg angle of view is a huge optical challenge.

I think this was the major difficulty faced by the officals, not any lack of concentration

None of the cameras that showed the ball clearly crossed the line were from the same position and view that either the ref or the A/R had.

As I said in another thread - it's a well known difficulty in current officiating methodology on dealing with goal line calls from shots from far out when the defence is high up the field and the A/R is suppsoed to maintain position with the 2nd last defender - then follow the shot through.

Perhaps one of the reasons they were trialling Goal Area A/Rs in the Europa league.
 
Last word on it from me. Try a little experiment at your local park. Place the ball 18 inches behind the line and walk backwards and diagonally  and see just how far you have to walk before it gets even close to being contentious as to whether the ball is over the line. Imagine how much easier this is on a perfectly manicured pitch with freshely painted lines.


If only the ball was sitting stationary behind the line during the game - it certainly would make it a hell of a lot easier.

When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
I did kind of wonder what difference it made the ball bouncing comfortably back down into the keeper's arms from the underside of the bar. Clearly�Neuer saw it was over the line but once he had it safely in his grasp he was admirably nonchalant and this might possibly have been the telling factor that�convinced the ref that the 84,000 other people in the stadium had it wrong and were all seeing things.


�

Inescapable conclusion: Neuer is a cheat!


You can guess what we would have being saying had that been Mark S.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
StopOut wrote:
I did kind of wonder what difference it made the ball bouncing comfortably back down into the keeper's arms from the underside of the bar. Clearly�Neuer saw it was over the line but once he had it safely in his grasp he was admirably nonchalant and this might possibly have been the telling factor that�convinced the ref that the 84,000 other people in the stadium had it wrong and were all seeing things.


�

Inescapable conclusion: Neuer is a cheat!

Name me a footballer anywhere, at this level, that would have stopped, grabbed the ball and indicated to the ref that a goal has been scored. I very much doubt that you would find one.

Inescapable conclusion 2: Neuer is no different from all footballers, who must by your conclusion, all be cheats.

Sometimes called playing to the whistle.

I know, I know, its serious!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Firstly he didn't break any rule so he isn't a cheat.  And secondly I don't think he crossed any footballing moral boundary.  Pics posted earlier proved the ball didn't go in so I don't see why we're continuing this.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
World Cup Refs agree with me! ;)

"The priority of following the offside line makes goal judgements tougher.

"In your decisions and position, the offside line is the priority, absolutely," Hungarian linesman Tibor Vamos said."


http://www.smh.com.au/world-cup-2010/world-cup-news/world-cup-refs-defend-themselves-over-blunders-20100630-zjmh.html


When Hibs, went up, to win the Scottish Cup - I wisnae there - furfuxake!

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Turfmoore wrote:
Name me a footballer anywhere, at this level, that would have stopped, grabbed the ball and indicated to the ref that a goal has been scored. I very much doubt that you would find one.


Yep. The only case I remember off-hand was Bruce Grobbelaar, in the replayed semi-final (after Hillsborough) between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest. With the scores 0-0 (I think), he saved a shot, but he admitted it was a goal as it had crossed the line.


Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
LOL.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sorry if it has already been covered....
 
 
"After the match, Neuer gave this account of his actions: "I tried not to react to the referee and just concentrate on what was happening. I realised it was over the line and I think the way I carried on so quickly fooled the referee into thinking it was not over."
 
and
 
"An internet search brought me just one clear-cut instance of a footballer doing something equivalent to a batsman walking. In 1996, Liverpool striker Robbie Fowler was awarded a penalty for being fouled by the Arsenal goalkeeper. He told the referee that he had not been fouled, but the referee insisted he take the penalty kick. Fowler did so, but in a manner that enabled the goalkeeper to save it"
 
 
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
imaginality wrote:
Turfmoore wrote:
Name me a footballer anywhere, at this level, that would have stopped, grabbed the ball and indicated to the ref that a goal has been scored. I very much doubt that you would find one.


Yep. The only case I remember off-hand was Bruce Grobbelaar, in the replayed semi-final (after Hillsborough) between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest. With the scores 0-0 (I think), he saved a shot, but he admitted it was a goal as it had crossed the line.




Bruce Grobbelaar was one of the most dishonest individuals ever to play the sport. He probably admitted to it crossing the line because he had a bet on Forest winning 1-0.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:

imaginality wrote:

Turfmoore wrote:
Name me a footballer anywhere, at this level, that would have stopped, grabbed the ball and indicated to the ref that a goal has been scored. I very much doubt that you would find one.
Yep. The only case I remember off-hand was Bruce Grobbelaar, in the replayed semi-final (after Hillsborough) between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest. With the scores 0-0 (I think), he saved a shot, but he admitted it was a goal as it had crossed the line.
Bruce Grobbelaar was one of the most dishonest individuals ever to play the sport. He probably admitted to it crossing the line because he had a bet on Forest winning 1-0.


He was probably the only one of a few who got caught.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If he saw it cross the line,thats poor. I dont care if you say no other footballer would do it,its still poor sportsmanship. If you have a go at people for diving (or Henrys handball),you cannot turn around and let this one go.
 
How is it any different from diving to win a penalty.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:
If he saw it cross the line,thats poor. I dont care if you say no other footballer would do it,its still poor sportsmanship. If you have a go at people for diving (or Henrys handball),you cannot turn around and let this one go.
�

How is it any different from diving to win a penalty.


It is different cause he did not cheat ( by diving) He never said it did or did not go over the line. He just played the whistle.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Leggy wrote:
Tegal wrote:
If he saw it cross the line,thats poor. I dont care if you say no other footballer would do it,its still poor sportsmanship. If you have a go at people for diving (or Henrys handball),you cannot turn around and let this one go.
 

How is it any different from diving to win a penalty.


It is different cause he did not cheat ( by diving) He never said it did or did not go over the line. He just played the whistle.
Ermmmm yes he did!
 
 
"After the match, Neuer gave this account of his actions: "I tried not to react to the referee and just concentrate on what was happening. I realised it was over the line and I think the way I carried on so quickly fooled the referee into thinking it was not over."
Permalink Permalink