News Discussion and Football Blogging

Matt Morris is...

215 replies · 9,447 views
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:


Until then, go shag another sheep .


This makes Matt look a bit stupid.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It pretty much shows that we aren't harming your bid for an ACL spot.
 
You can't just put an out clause that contradicts your statement,and still claim to be right.

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:

Does it?

The article refers to the official report - I've said that there are constant adjustments being made behind the scenes and I still haven't seen anything to contradict that.
Err you haven't shown any evidence that there was an adjustment last year.  Was why is the default that there was one, and unless it is proven otherwise, then that stands?
 
Anyway, let assume there was an internal review done last year, with the points as stated on wiki.  points of 343 would only give Aussie a reference figure of 2.60 (i.e. 15 slots x 343 / 1981).  Therefore only qualifying themselves for 2 slots.  And before you start spouting 'why does that get rounded down to 2' then check out the reference figures for Jordon, Kuwait, and India.  they all get round down to 1.
 
Like I say, blog fail.  better luck next time.
2ndBest2010-08-02 13:58:34
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Junior82 wrote:
mlmorris wrote:


Until then, go shag another sheep .


This makes Matt look a bit stupid.
He's just having a laugh, it's nice to see some humour!
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Mr "I have friends in high places behind the scenes' is far too up himself IMO.

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
Mr "I have friends in high places behind the scenes' is far too up himself IMO.
Leave hard News out of this, what's he ever done to you?
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:
2ndBest wrote:
http://au.fourfourtwo.com/news/173356,acl-spot-at-stake-in-afc-tour.aspx
This makes Matt look a little bit stupid.


Does it?

The article refers to the official report - I've said that there are constant adjustments being made behind the scenes and I still haven't seen anything to contradict that.

When I do, I'll put my hand up and say so. Until then, go shag another sheep .
 
I guarantee you won't. 
 
Young blokes with mistrustful thin lips like yourself are so full of pride and boastfulness that humility does not come easily.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Needs more Tim Tam.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It looks like a poo.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Definitely looks like a poo.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
2ndBest wrote:
mlmorris wrote:

Does it?

The article refers to the official report - I've said that there are constant adjustments being made behind the scenes and I still haven't seen anything to contradict that.
Err you haven't shown any evidence that there was an adjustment last year.  Was why is the default that there was one, and unless it is proven otherwise, then that stands?
 
Anyway, let assume there was an internal review done last year, with the points as stated on wiki.  points of 343 would only give Aussie a reference figure of 2.60 (i.e. 15 slots x 343 / 1981).  Therefore only qualifying themselves for 2 slots.  And before you start spouting 'why does that get rounded down to 2' then check out the reference figures for Jordon, Kuwait, and India.  they all get round down to 1.
 
Like I say, blog fail.  better luck next time.


"Public lashing" fail.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
And I thought thin lips were a sign of a sex offender, not someone that is full of "pride and boastfulness".
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wheres the "Australian Michael Lawls" option?

Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:
Definitely looks like a poo.
 
Nope.  Looks like Tim Tams, Fatt "I've had plenty of Asian business and political experience" Dorris.
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:
And I thought thin lips were a sign of a sex offender, not someone that is full of "pride and boastfulness".


Getting ready to fess up to something?
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
mlmorris wrote:
And I thought thin lips were a sign of a sex offender, not someone that is full of "pride and boastfulness".


Getting ready to fess up to something?


Yes. Your mother loves the thin lips on the nethers.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:
Yes. Your mother loves the thin lips on the nethers.

Classy
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris, out of interest, what A-League side do you support?
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
simon_hampton wrote:
mlmorris, out of interest, what A-League side do you support?


Anyone that read my blogs would know this
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Or you could just tell us. Your blogs are sh*t.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:

simon_hampton wrote:
mlmorris, out of interest, what A-League side do you support?
Anyone that read my blogs would know this


I don't read your blogs.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
So go read them. You might learn something.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:
So go read them. You might learn something.


Like what? That you know the square root of f**k all about football?

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:
So go read them. You might learn something.


No.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
simon_hampton wrote:
mlmorris wrote:
So go read them. You might learn something be fed some incorrect information. 


No.
corrected

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Buffon II wrote:
mlmorris wrote:
So go read them. You might learn something.


Like what? That you know the square root of f**k all about football?


I have never discussed football in any of my blogs, because I don't know much about it.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:
Buffon II wrote:
mlmorris wrote:
So go read them. You might learn something.


Like what? That you know the square root of f**k all about football?


I have never discussed football in any of my blogs, because I don't know much about it.


You make that very clear.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Less stupids please, and can we get this back on topic ?


Hard News2010-08-02 20:01:25

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hang on, there was about 5 pages worth on tim tams earlier in this thread, you didn't seem to mind that. Only when it suits huh?

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Incidentally, if you want to tell notorganic how you have an issue with him use the 442 forums.  Rest assured his blogs only skim the surface...

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I don't think so. I'm supposed to be getting better not worse.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Timtastic.




(Tam, not Brown)
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
mlmorris wrote:

el grapadura wrote:
mlmorris wrote:
And I thought thin lips were a sign of a sex offender, not someone that is full of "pride and boastfulness".


Getting ready to fess up to something?
Yes. Your mother loves the thin lips on the nethers.


Let's get off mothers dude, I just got off yours.
Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
mlmorris wrote:

el grapadura wrote:
mlmorris wrote:
And I thought thin lips were a sign of a sex offender, not someone that is full of "pride and boastfulness".


Getting ready to fess up to something?
Yes. Your mother loves the thin lips on the nethers.


Let's get off mothers dude, I just got off yours.


MEOW.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Alright Matt, let�s run through a few facts.

1)      There was an assessment in October 2008 based on the 2007/8 season (stated in the recent 442 Article).  In it, HAL was giving 2 spots even though they scored over 300, because they only had 8 teams.  Therefore they were given the exact amount of spots that the criteria suggested.  Thus no conspiracy.  Can you agree with that?

2)      There will be another assessment in September 2010. We have a 442 article that states �a delegation�...�arrives in Australia�....to run a �exhaustive health test� over the game.  So this states some people from the AFC come to Australia to assess the game (i.e. the assessment is not done in AFC HQ in Kuala Lumpur).  The same article also states that the last report was published in 2008.  Given the report was based on the 2007/8 season, I think it is safe to assume (given they assess attendance and it is hard to assess crowds for game that haven�t taken played yet) this report will be based on the 2009/10 season, where there was 10 teams. Can you agree with that? 

Now let�s assess your thinking.

You claim internal assessments are taking place all the time based on your �source� and that Australia scored 343 in the 2009 assessment (even though there wasn�t any evidence of a delegation arriving in Australia to assess the HAL).  That may well be true, but I am yet to be convinced.  You have yet to provide any documents to back that up.  No articles, no reports. Nothing.  All you got is you claim you have a source (and only then did you tell us this after you started to get questioned), and there is a wiki article that states 343, but this is not cited.  All we are going on is your word.  So forgive me if I�m sceptical.

But anyway, let�s assume you are correct, and there was a report in 2009.  This would mean it is based on the 2008/9 season.  So 343 should qualify HAL for 3 spots (assuming the reference figure gets rounded up � given the afc documents it�s hard to say whether it gets rounded up, or whether it is a threshold). But hang on, in the 2008/9 season, HAL was still an 8 team league.  Therefore only 2 spots would be allocated.

I await your response

Permalink Permalink
over 15 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
To hell with all this irrelevant nonsense, I want to know why Matt's avatar on 442 is a man's naked bottom.

Ramming liberal dribble down your throat since 2009
This forum needs less angst and more Kate Bush threads



Permalink Permalink