Off Topic

Do you consider Pluto to be a planet?

47 replies · 8,889 views
over 10 years ago

Would be Pluto I'm thinking which is 240+ of our years and given that it was only discovered in 1930 then no way could it be eligible for planet status.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

To obtain Planet status Pluto must satisfy the following:

Any stellar-orbital-object who ... [assumes] a new nationality and who has not played international asteroid baiting [in a match ... in an official competition of any category or any type of asteroid baiting for one Galactic Association] shall be eligible to be called a Planet only if it fulfills one of the following conditions:

(a) It was born in the solar system of the relevant Association;
(b) Its geological parent was born in the solar system of the relevant Association;
(c) Its geological grandparent was born in the solar system of the relevant Association;
(d) It has orbited continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18 in the solar system of the relevant Association.

How confusing. 

More pertinently, Saturn will be having none of that. Saturn to hire Mai Chen. 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

Would be Pluto I'm thinking which is 240+ of our years and given that it was only discovered in 1930 then no way could it be eligible for planet status.

I hate your antiplutoist stance. It's a planet, people live there, get over it ffs.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

ForteanTimes wrote:

Junior82 wrote:

Would be Pluto I'm thinking which is 240+ of our years and given that it was only discovered in 1930 then no way could it be eligible for planet status.

I hate your antiplutoist stance. It's a planet, people live there, get over it ffs.

Fudge me have the Asians bought all the houses there too?

"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

C-Diddy wrote:

ForteanTimes wrote:

Junior82 wrote:

Would be Pluto I'm thinking which is 240+ of our years and given that it was only discovered in 1930 then no way could it be eligible for planet status.

I hate your antiplutoist stance. It's a planet, people live there, get over it ffs.

Fudge me have the Asians bought all the houses there too?

and can they get consent for a liquor license???? 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Junior82 wrote:

To obtain Planet status Pluto must satisfy the following:

Any stellar-orbital-object who ... [assumes] a new nationality and who has not played international asteroid baiting [in a match ... in an official competition of any category or any type of asteroid baiting for one Galactic Association] shall be eligible to be called a Planet only if it fulfills one of the following conditions:

(a) It was born in the solar system of the relevant Association;
(b) Its geological parent was born in the solar system of the relevant Association;
(c) Its geological grandparent was born in the solar system of the relevant Association;
(d) It has orbited continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18 in the solar system of the relevant Association.

Interesting. So when was the protest against Pluto made? And was it done via fax?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Who would the NIMBY's be?

Proud to have attended the first 175 Consecutive "Home" Wellington Phoenix "A League" Games !!

The Ruf, The Ruf, The Ruf is on Fire!!

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

You can always expect blowback from Uranus.

"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink